Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

The Fish in Secondary Prevention of Heart Disease (FISH) Survey—Primary Care Physicians and ω3 Fatty Acid Prescribing Behaviors

Robert C. Oh, Shirley A. A. Beresford and William E. Lafferty
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2006, 19 (5) 459-467; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.5.459
Robert C. Oh
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shirley A. A. Beresford
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William E. Lafferty
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Patient Scenarios

    Q5. Your patient is a 65-year-old male who recently suffered from a myocardial infarction. He does not have diabetes and his LDL cholesterol is currently 79 mg/dL on medications. His blood pressure is well controlled on a beta-blocker. He asks you for a diet to reduce his chance of ‘another heart attack.’ He is not overweight. Which diet would you recommend?
    YOU MAY CHOOSE MORE THAN ONE
    • □ Lower carbohydrate, higher protein diet (eg, Atkins, South Beach)

    • □ Low saturated fat, high fruit and vegetable diet

    • □ Increased intake of fatty fish meals, at least twice a week

    • □ Low sodium diet

    • □ None

    • □ Other

    Q6a. Another patient asks your opinion about a low carbohydrate, high protein diet (eg, Atkins, South Beach). He is similar to the patient in Q5 except he is 30 lbs overweight. How do you respond to this patient?
    • □ Strongly recommend it

    • □ Recommend it

    • □ No opinion

    • □ Advise against it

    • □ Strongly advise against it

    Q6b. This same patient asks for your advice regarding dietary fish or supplementation. How do you respond?
    • □ Strongly recommend it

    • □ Recommend it

    • □ No opinion

    • □ Advise against it

    • □ Strongly advise against it

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Background and Prescribing Practices of Washington State Family Physicians (n = 233)

    % (n)
    Age
        <40 years old39.9 (89)
        41 to 50 years old30.5 (68)
        >50 years old29.6 (66)
    Gender
        Male132 (59.2)
        Female91 (40.8)
    CVD* patients seen per week
        1 to 1052.5 (117)
        11 to 2030.5 (68)
        21 to 3013.0 (29)
        >304.0 (9)
    Nutrition training (any)90.6 (202)
        CME74.4 (166)
        Medical school51.6 (115)
        Residency53.4 (119)
        Other22.9 (51)
    Prescriber of dietary advice†
        Low (<40%)10.7 (24)
        Moderate (40% to 60%)20.2 (45)
        High (>60%)69.0 (154)
    Prescriber of fish advice†
        Low (<40%)53.3 (119)
        Moderate (40% to 60%)21.5 (48)
        High (>60%)25.1 (56)
    • * CVD, cardiovascular disease; CME, continuing medical education.

    • † Represents frequency of advice given by respondents to patients with known CVD and categorized into low, moderate, and high prescribers.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Dietary Knowledge and Attitudes of Washington State Family Physicians (n = 223)

    Dietary Knowledge*Percent Answering Correctly (n)
    General diet questions
        Antioxidants do not reduce CVD†76.2 (170)
        Low sodium diets lower blood pressure70.4 (157)
        Fruits and vegetables lower blood pressure32.7 (73)
    Fish questions
        Fish oil reduces CVD56.5 (126)
        Fish oil reduces triglycerides43.0 (96)
        Fish oil reduces sudden cardiac death26.5 (59)
    Dietary attitudesAgree (%)‡
        Nutrition has an important part to play in the prevention of CVD99.1
        The primary care physician has an essential role in giving dietary advice91.9
        Advice given will impact on what people eat66.8
        Advice given will be effective in reducing CVD52.5
        The primary care physician has sufficient time to advise patients adequately18.8
    • * Statements represent correct answers to knowledge questions.

    • † CVD, cardiovascular disease.

    • ‡ Strongly agree or agree.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Associations with High Fish Prescribers and Dietary Knowledge, Training, and Attitudes Variables

    High Fish Prescribers
    No (n = 185)Yes (n = 38)
    DIETARY KNOWLEDGE
    General diet questions (correctly answered)% (n)% (n)P Value*
        Antioxidants do not reduce CVD†77 (143)71 (27).410
        Low sodium diets lower blood pressure71 (131)68 (26).769
        Fruits and vegetables lower blood pressure32 (59)37 (14).554
    Fish questions (correctly answered)
        Fish oil reduces CVD54 (100)68 (26).104
        Fish oil reduces triglycerides42 (77)50 (19).342
        Fish oil reduces sudden cardiac death23 (42)45 (17).005
    NUTRITION TRAINING
        Any89 (165)97.4 (37).138‡
        CME28 (134)15.7 (6).131
        Medical school49.7 (92)60.5 (23).225
        Residency52.4 (97)57.9 (22).539
        Other23.8 (44)18.4 (7).473
    DIETARY ATTITUDESP Value§
    Nutrition has an important part to play in the prevention of CVD
        Neutral1.1 (2)—.730
        Agree32.4 (60)36.8 (14)
        Strongly agree66.5 (123)63.3 (24)
    The primary care physician has an essential role in giving dietary advice
        Strongly disagree0.5 (1)—.309
        Disagree1.1 (2)—
        Neutral7.0 (13)5.3 (2)
        Agree44.3 (82)39.5 (15)
        Strongly agree47.0 (87)55.3 (21)
    Advice given will impact on what people eat
        Disagree8.6 (16)7.9 (3).841
        Neutral24.3 (45)26.3 (10)
        Agree55.1 (102)50.0 (19)
        Strongly agree11.9 (22)15.8 (6)
    Advice given will be effective in reducing CVD
        Strongly disagree0.5 (1)–.095
        Disagree7.6 (14)5.3 (2)
        Neutral41.6 (77)31.6 (12)
        Agree43.8 (81)50.0 (19)
        Strongly agree6.5 (12)13.2 (5)
    The primary care physician has sufficient time to advise patients adequately
        Strongly disagree29.7 (55)15.8 (6).018
        Disagree41.6 (77)36.8 (14)
        Neutral11.9 (22)18.4 (7)
        Agree15.7 (29)28.9 (11)
        Strongly agree1.1 (2)
    • * CVD, cardiovascular disease; CME, continuing medical education.

    • † χ2 test.

    • ‡ Fisher’s exact test.

    • § Mann-Whitney U.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 19 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 19, Issue 5
September-October 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Fish in Secondary Prevention of Heart Disease (FISH) Survey—Primary Care Physicians and ω3 Fatty Acid Prescribing Behaviors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Fish in Secondary Prevention of Heart Disease (FISH) Survey—Primary Care Physicians and ω3 Fatty Acid Prescribing Behaviors
Robert C. Oh, Shirley A. A. Beresford, William E. Lafferty
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2006, 19 (5) 459-467; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.5.459

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Fish in Secondary Prevention of Heart Disease (FISH) Survey—Primary Care Physicians and ω3 Fatty Acid Prescribing Behaviors
Robert C. Oh, Shirley A. A. Beresford, William E. Lafferty
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2006, 19 (5) 459-467; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.5.459
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire