BI-RADS Classification for Management of Abnormal Mammograms

References

1. ↵
   American College of Radiology. The ACR breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) [web source]. November 11, 2003. Available from: http://www.acr.org/departments/stand_accred/birads/contents.html. Accessed February, 27, 2004.
2. ↵
   Liberman L, Menell JH. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Radiol Clin North Am May 2002; 40: 409–30.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   Singletary E, Anderson B, Bevers T, Borgen P, Buys S, Daly M. National comprehensive cancer network: clinical practice guidelines in oncology, breast cancer screening and diagnosis guidelines, v. 1.2003. 08/20/02. Available from: http://www.nccn.org/physician_gls/f_guidelines.html. Accessed March 1, 2004.
4. ↵
   Bomalaski JJ, Tabano M, Hooper L, Fiorica J. Mammography. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2001; 13: 15–23.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. ↵
   Poplack SP, Tosteson AN, Grove MR, Wells WA, Carney PA. Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire mammography network. Radiology 2000; 217: 832–40.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
6. Varas X, Leborgne F, Leborgne JH. Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 1992; 184: 409–14.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
7. Monticciolo DL, Caplan LS. The American College of Radiology’s BI-RADS 3 classification in a nationwide screening program: current assessment and comparison with earlier use. Breast J 2004; 10: 106–10.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. ↵
   Lacquement MA, Mitchell D, Hollingsworth AB. Positive predictive value of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189: 34–40.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C, Sullivan DC. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 1999; 211: 845–50.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman JR, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 35–40.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
11. Sickles EA. Management of probably benign breast lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33: 1123–30.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
12. Sickles EA, Parker SH. Appropriate role of core breast biopsy in the management of probably benign lesions. Radiology 1993; 188: 315.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
13. Lindfors KK, O’Connor J, Acredolo CR, Liston SE. Short-interval follow-up mammography versus immediate core biopsy of benign breast lesions: assessment of patient stress. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 55–8.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. Brenner RJ, Sickles EA. Surveillance mammography and stereotactic core breast biopsy for probably benign lesions: a cost comparison analysis. Acad Radiol 1997; 4: 419–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. Sickles EA. Probably benign breast lesions: when should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol? Radiology 1999; 213: 11–4.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science