Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
OtherEvidence-Based Clinical Medicine

BI-RADS Classification for Management of Abnormal Mammograms

Margaret M. Eberl, Chester H. Fox, Stephen B. Edge, Cathleen A. Carter and Martin C. Mahoney
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2006, 19 (2) 161-164; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.2.161
Margaret M. Eberl
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chester H. Fox
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen B. Edge
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cathleen A. Carter
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin C. Mahoney
MD, PhD, FAAFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Evidence Table for Clinical Management Recommendations for Mammograms by Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category

    BI-RADS CategoryAssessmentClinical Management Recommendation(s)Strength of RecommendationReferencesComments on References
    0Assessment incompleteNeed to review prior studies and/or complete additional imagingA3All or none study; consensus guidelines
    1NegativeContinue routine screeningA3, 8Consensus guidelines; validated clinical decision tool
    2Benign findingContinue routine screeningA3, 8Consensus guidelines; validated clinical decision tool
    3Probably benign findingShort-term follow-up mammogram at 6 months, then every 6 to 12 months for 1 to 2 yearsB3, 6, 8, 10–15Consensus guidelines; cohort studies; large case series; validated decision tool; less patient stress; lowered costs with surveillance
    4Suspicious abnormalityPerform biopsy, preferably needle biopsyA3, 8–10All or none study; validated clinical decision tool
    5Highly suspicious of malignancy; appropriate action should be taken.Biopsy and treatment, as necessary.A3, 8–10All or none study; validated clinical decision tool
    6Known biopsy-proven malignancy, treatment pendingAssure that treatment is completed
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Mammography Assessment and Breast Cancers Detected in the New Hampshire Mammography Registry, 11/96 to 10/97, by Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category

    BI-RADS CategoryBaseline Mammography*Breast Cancers Detected Rate/1000Anticipated Rate of Malignancy Following Biopsy
    NumberPercentage
    137,99580.65%0.7—†
    24,93010.46%1.2—†
    33,3457.10%8.1<2%6–8
    47661.63%135.823%–34%12–15
    5760.16%605.3≥95%1,4,12–15
    Total47,112100.00%
    • * Data derived from Poplack et. al.5

    • † Categories 1 and 2 are considered to be negative test results.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 19 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 19, Issue 2
March-April 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
BI-RADS Classification for Management of Abnormal Mammograms
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
BI-RADS Classification for Management of Abnormal Mammograms
Margaret M. Eberl, Chester H. Fox, Stephen B. Edge, Cathleen A. Carter, Martin C. Mahoney
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2006, 19 (2) 161-164; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.2.161

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
BI-RADS Classification for Management of Abnormal Mammograms
Margaret M. Eberl, Chester H. Fox, Stephen B. Edge, Cathleen A. Carter, Martin C. Mahoney
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2006, 19 (2) 161-164; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.2.161
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • The BI-RADS System
    • Conclusion
    • Clinical Vignettes to Illustrate Clinical Management Using BI-RADS Codes
    • Patient Education
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Understanding linkage to biopsy and treatment for breast cancer after a high-risk telemammography result in Peru: a mixed-methods study
  • Volumetric Mammographic Density, Age-Related Decline, and Breast Cancer Risk Factors in a National Breast Cancer Screening Program
  • Insurance-Based Differences in Time to Diagnostic Follow-up after Positive Screening Mammography
  • Breast Calcification Imaging
  • Prediction of Incomplete Screening Mammograms Based on Age and Race
  • Mammography and Ultrasound Imaging of Preinvasive and Invasive Canine Spontaneous Mammary Cancer and Their Similarities to Human Breast Cancer
  • Content Usage and the Most Frequently Read Articles in 2010
  • Content Usage and the Most Frequently Read Articles in 2009
  • Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: A Review
  • Introduction of More Editorial Board Members and the Most Frequently Read Articles in 2008
  • The Augmented Breast
  • Inside the March/April 2008 Issue and the Most Frequently-Read Articles in 2007
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Practical Recommendations for Minimizing Pain and Anxiety with IUD Insertion
  • A Simplified Approach to Evaluate and Manage Shoulder Pain
  • Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms
Show more Evidence-Based Clinical Medicine

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire