Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
OtherFamily Medicine and the Health Care System

Primary Care Experience and Racial Disparities in Self-Reported Health Status

Leiyu Shi, Lisa H. Green and Sophia Kazakova
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice November 2004, 17 (6) 443-452; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.17.6.443
Leiyu Shi
DrPH, MBA, MPA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa H. Green
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sophia Kazakova
MD, MPH, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Health status odds ratios by 3 models (simple, with primary care, and with primary care and socioeconomic status).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Mental health status odds ratios by 3 models (simple, with primary care, and with primary care and socioeconomic status).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Multivariate Analysis of Vulnerability, Primary Care Experiences, and Health (Odds Ratio (95% CI))

    Health Status (Modeling 1 = Poor Health)
    Model IModel IIModel III
    1996/1997
        Vulnerability
            White-Poverty2.79 (2.50, 3.12)***2.60 (2.25, 3.02)***1.30 (1.11, 1.54)**
            White-above Poverty (ref)
            Black-Poverty3.07 (2.56, 3.69)***2.89 (2.32, 3.61)***1.61 (1.32, 1.97)***
            Black-above Poverty1.51 (1.32, 1.73)***1.36 (1.17, 1.59)***1.32 (1.13, 1.53)***
            Hispanic-Poverty4.28 (3.67, 4.99)***3.09 (2.48, 3.85)***1.58, 1.19, 2.09)**
            Hispanic-above Poverty2.10 (1.87, 2.35)***1.41 (1.17, 1.69)***1.36 (1.12, 1.65)**
            Other-Poverty3.69 (2.53, 5.39)***3.28 (2.07, 5.19)***2.33 (1.32, 4.13)**
            Other-above Poverty1.17 (0.99, 1.37)1.09 (0.88, 1.34)0.96 (0.76, 1.21)
        Primary Care
            Accessibility0.85 (0.83, 0.87)***0.92 (0.90, 0.94)***
            Interpersonal Relationship0.93 (0.92, 0.95)***0.93 (0.91, 0.94)***
        Covariates†
            Sample size60,44637,03937,039
    1998/1999
        Vulnerability
            White-Poverty2.68 (2.42, 2.96)***2.77 (2.43, 3.15)***1.54 (1.35, 1.77)***
            White-above Poverty (ref)
            Black-Poverty3.17 (2.71, 3.70)***2.89 (2.30, 3.65)***1.36 (1.03, 1.80)*
            Black-above Poverty1.46 (1.29, 1.66)***1.38 (1.22, 1.56)***1.40 (1.23, 1.60)***
            Hispanic-Poverty3.90 (3.31, 4.58)***3.06 (2.28, 4.12)***1.66 (1.22, 2.26)**
            Hispanic-above Poverty1.76 (1.55, 2.00)***1.41 (1.19, 1.66)***1.48 (1.26, 1.73)***
            Other-Poverty2.48 (1.81, 3.41)***1.98 (1.24, 3.18)**1.19 (0.70, 2.00)
            Other-above Poverty1.20 (1.03, 1.39)*1.30 (1.08, 1.57)**1.26 (0.98, 1.62)
        Primary Care
            Accessibility0.86 (0.84, 0.88)***0.94 (0.92, 0.96)***
            Interpersonal Relationship0.94 (0.93, 0.95)***0.94 (0.93, 0.96)***
        Covariates †
            Sample size58,95636,74336,743
    • * P < .5;

    • ** P < .01;

    • *** P < .001.

    • † Covariates include sex, education, insurance coverage, smoke or not, employment status, and usual source of care type of place (age and employer type not included).

    • Note: Analysis for all models excluded the observations that have missing values in mental health status. Models II and III also excluded those who did not answer all 7 questions in regard to accessibility and interpersonal relationship of primary care.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Multivariate Analysis of Vulnerability, Primary Care, and Mental Health Status (Odds Ratio (95% CI))

    Mental Health (Modeling 1 = Poor Mental Health)
    Model IModel IIModel III
    1996/1997
        Vulnerability
            White-Poverty2.02 (1.84, 2.21)***2.09 (1.83, 2.37)***1.40 (1.22, 1.61)***
            White-above Poverty (ref)
            Black-Poverty2.80 (2.31, 3.41)***2.71 (2.12, 3.46)***1.61 (1.26, 2.05)***
            Black-above Poverty1.32 (1.17, 1.49)***1.12 (1.00, 1.26)*1.03 (0.91, 1.16)
            Hispanic-Poverty1.57 (1.31, 1.87)***1.67 (1.29, 2.17)***0.98 (0.71, 1.34)
            Hispanic-above Poverty1.19 (1.09, 1.31)***1.12 (0.97, 1.28)1.00 (0.82, 1.22)
            Other-Poverty2.13 (1.62, 2.81)***2.68 (1.93, 3.70)***1.78 (1.25, 2.53)**
            Other-above Poverty1.18 (1.05, 1.34)**1.23 (1.06, 1.42)**1.13 (0.96, 1.34)
        Primary Care
            Accessibility0.95 (0.93, 0.98)***0.92 (0.95, 0.99)*
            Interpersonal Relationship0.92 (0.92, 0.93)***0.92 (0.92, 0.93)***
        Covariates†
            Sample size498073049230492
    1998/1999
        Vulnerability
            White-Poverty2.12 (1.83, 2.45)***2.23 (1.84, 2.69)***1.45 (1.20, 1.75)***
            White-above Poverty (ref)
            Black-Poverty2.70 (1.83, 2.45)***2.37 (1.92, 2.92)***1.21 (0.95, 1.55)
            Black-above Poverty1.38 (1.26, 1.51)***1.32 (1.18, 1.49)***1.21 (1.08, 1.36)***
            Hispanic-Poverty2.19 (1.66, 2.88)***2.29 (1.74, 3.01)***1.33 (0.99, 1.79)
            Hispanic-above Poverty1.20 (1.08, 1.33)***1.15 (0.99, 1.33)1.10 (0.94, 1.28)
            Other-Poverty2.35 (1.67, 3.31)***2.24 (1.40, 3.60)***1.44 (0.87, 2.38)
            Other-above Poverty1.03 (0.88, 1.21)0.95 (0.80, 1.13)0.84 (0.69, 1.01)
        Primary Care
            Accessibility0.94 (0.92, 0.96)***0.96 (0.94, 0.98)***
            Interpersonal Relationship0.93 (0.92, 0.94)***0.93 (0.92, 0.94)***
        Covariates †
            Sample size487243035830358
    • * P < .5;

    • ** P < .01;

    • *** P < .001.

    • † Covariates include sex, education, insurance coverage, smoke or not, employment status, and usual source of care type of place (age and employer type not included).

    • Note: Analysis for all models excluded the observations that have missing values in mental health status. Models II and III also excluded those who did not answer all 7 questions in regard to accessibility and interpersonal relationship of primary care.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Bivariate Analysis of Vulnerability, Primary Care, and General Health Status

    1996/19971998/1999
    Good HealthPoor HealthGood HealthPoor Health
    Race
        White89.19%10.81%89.18%10.82%
        Black83.10%16.90%83.03%16.97%
        Hispanic78.26%21.74%80.47%19.53%
        Other85.96%14.04%87.08%12.92%
        CHISQ83.5***77.9***
        Sample size6044658956
    Vulnerability
        White
            Poverty77.44%22.56%77.79%22.21%
            Above Poverty90.55%9.45%90.37%9.63%
        Black
            Poverty75.72%24.28%74.76%25.24%
            Above Poverty86.39%13.61%86.49%13.51%
        Hispanic
            Poverty69.12%30.88%70.66%29.34%
            Above Poverty82.03%17.97%84.22%15.78%
        Other
            Poverty72.17%27.83%79.07%20.93%
            Above Poverty89.14%10.86%88.67%11.33%
        CHISQ150.16176.77
        Sample size6044658956
    Primary Care
        Accessibility13.2512.8513.0712.91
            t test13.59***6.09***
            Sample size3759237287
        Interpersonal Relationship16.7215.7416.8015.91
            t test12.49***15.89***
            Sample size4434343721
    • *P < .5;

    • **P < .01;

    • *** P < .001.

    • Note: Distribution and t test for accessibility of primary care included those who answered all 3 questions on accessibility. Distribution and t test for interpersonal relationship included those who answered all 4 questions on interpersonal relationship.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Bivariate Analysis of Vulnerability, Primary Care Experiences, and Mental Health Status

    1996/19971998/1999
    Good HealthPoor HealthGood HealthPoor Health
    Race
        White78.22%21.78%79.16%20.84%
        Black70.31%29.69%71.16%28.84%
        Hispanic75.15%24.85%74.49%25.51%
        Other74.57%25.43%77.22%22.78%
        CHISQ32.53***61.03***
        Sample size4980748724
    Vulnerability
        White
            Poverty65.86%34.14%65.96%34.04%
            Above Poverty79.57%20.43%80.43%19.57%
        Black
            Poverty58.16%41.84%60.38%39.62%
            Above Poverty74.69%25.31%74.87%25.13%
        Hispanic
            Poverty71.31%28.69%65.26%34.74%
            Above Poverty76.54%23.46%77.44%22.56%
        Other
            Poverty64.61%35.39%63.62%36.38%
            Above Poverty76.68%23.32%79.92%20.08%
        CHISQ178.12162.86
        Sample size4980748724
    Primary Care
        Accessibility13.1312.9913.0712.91
            t test4.39***6.09***
            Sample size3759237287
        Interpersonal Relationship16.7415.7516.8015.91
            t test17.25***15.89***
            Sample size4434343721
    • *P < .5;

    • **P < .01;

    • *** P < .001

    • Note: Distribution and t test for accessibility of primary care included those who answered all 3 questions on accessibility. Distribution and t test for interpersonal relationship included those who answered all 4 questions on interpersonal relationship.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice: 17 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
Vol. 17, Issue 6
1 Nov 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Primary Care Experience and Racial Disparities in Self-Reported Health Status
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
18 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Primary Care Experience and Racial Disparities in Self-Reported Health Status
Leiyu Shi, Lisa H. Green, Sophia Kazakova
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Nov 2004, 17 (6) 443-452; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.17.6.443

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Primary Care Experience and Racial Disparities in Self-Reported Health Status
Leiyu Shi, Lisa H. Green, Sophia Kazakova
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Nov 2004, 17 (6) 443-452; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.17.6.443
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Assessing the Longitudinal Impact of Physician-Patient Relationship on Functional Health
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Goal-Oriented Prevention: How to Fit a Square Peg into a Round Hole
  • The Association Between Family Medicine Appointment Cancellations and Hospital Utilization in 2019 and 2020
  • Partnerships to Care for Our Patients and Communities During COVID-19
Show more Family Medicine and the Health Care System

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire