Research ArticleOriginal Research

Effects of Academic Detailing, Panel Management and Mailed Multi-Target Stool-DNA Testing on Colorectal Cancer Screening

Arturas Klugas, Sara Elsayed, Michael Rodriguez, Shourya Verma, Andre’ Bateman and Matthew Stack
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2024, jabfm.2023.230082R1; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230082R1

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Siegel R,
    2. Miller K,
    3. Fuchs H,
    4. Jemal A
    . Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022;72:7–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 2021;325:1965–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hall IJ,
    2. Tangka FKL,
    3. Sabatino SA,
    4. Thompson TD,
    5. Graubard BI,
    6. Breen N
    . Patterns and trends in cancer screening in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis 2018;15:E97. Published 26 July 2018.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Carmichael Cowan H,
    2. McIntyre M,
    3. Velopulos RC
    . Disparities in colorectal cancer mortality for rural populations in the United States: does screening matter? Am J Surg 2020;219:988–9.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Community Preventive Services Task Force. Increasing colorectal cancer screening: multicomponent interventions. Community Preventive Services Task Force findings and rationale statement. Available at: https://www.thecommunityguide.org/media/pdf/Cancer-Screening-Multicomponent-Colorectal.pdf. page last updated; October 8, 2019.
  6. 6.↵
    NaRCAD. Introductory guide to academic detailing. National Resource Center for Academic Detailing.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Gorin SS,
    2. Ashford AR,
    3. Lantigua R,
    4. et al
    . Effectiveness of academic detailing on breast cancer screening among primary care physicians in an underserved community. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:110–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Honigfeld L,
    2. Chandhok L,
    3. Spiegelman K
    . Engaging pediatricians in developmental screening: the effectiveness of academic detailing. J Autism Dev Disord 2012;42:1175–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lubelchek RJ,
    2. Hotton AL,
    3. Taussig D,
    4. Amarathithada D,
    5. Gonzalez M
    . Scaling up routine HIV testing at specialty clinics: assessing the effectiveness of an academic detailing approach. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2013;64 Suppl 1:S14–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Chhina HK,
    2. Bhole VM,
    3. Goldsmith C,
    4. Hall W,
    5. Kaczorowski J,
    6. Lacaille D
    . Effectiveness of academic detailing to optimize medication prescribing behavior of family physicians. J Pharm Pharm Sci 2013;16:511–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Dignan M,
    2. Shelton B,
    3. Slone SA,
    4. et al
    . Effectiveness of a primary care practice intervention for increasing colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky. Prev Med 2014;58:70–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Lawson G,
    2. Basch CH,
    3. Zybert P,
    4. Wolf RL,
    5. Basch CE
    . Acceptability of physician directed academic detailing to increase colorectal cancer screening: an application of the RESPECT approach. Health Promot Perspect 2015;5:169–75.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Curry WJ,
    2. Lengerich EJ,
    3. Kluhsman BC,
    4. et al
    . Academic detailing to increase colorectal cancer screening by primary care practices in Appalachian Pennsylvania. BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11:112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Shankaran V,
    2. Luu TH,
    3. Nonzee N,
    4. et al
    . Costs and cost effectiveness of a health care provider-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5370–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Neuwirth EE,
    2. Schmittdiel JA,
    3. Tallman K,
    4. Bellows J
    . Understanding panel management: a comparative study of an emerging approach to population care. Perm J 2007;11:12–20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Chen EH,
    2. Bodenheimer T
    . Improving population health through team-based panel management: comment on “electronic medical record reminders and panel management to improve primary care of elderly patients.” Arch Intern Med 2011;171:1558–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Bodenheimer T,
    2. Ghorob A,
    3. Willard-Grace R,
    4. Grumbach K
    . The 10 building blocks of high-performing primary care. Ann Fam Med 2014;12:166–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Marx R,
    2. Tse WM,
    3. Golden L,
    4. Johnson EC
    . Increasing colorectal cancer screening at community-based primary care clinics in San Francisco. J Public Health Manag Pract 2016;22:466–71.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Jager M,
    2. Demb J,
    3. Asghar A,
    4. et al
    . Mailed outreach is superior to usual care alone for colorectal cancer screening in the USA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2019;64:2489–96.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Davis MM,
    2. Freeman M,
    3. Shannon J,
    4. et al
    . A systematic review of clinic and community intervention to increase fecal testing for colorectal cancer in rural and low-income populations in the United States—how, what and when? BMC Cancer 2018;18:40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Imperiale T,
    2. Ransohoff D,
    3. Itzkowitz S,
    4. et al
    . Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1287–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Ghebreyesus T
    . WHO director-general’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. March 11, 2020, Geneva.
  23. 23.↵
    American College of Surgeons. COVID-19: Recommendations for management of elective surgical procedures. March 13, 2020. Available at: https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/covid-19/clinical-guidance/elective-surgery.
  24. 24.↵
    1. Mazidimoradi A,
    2. Tiznobaik A,
    3. Salehiniya H
    . Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Cancer 2022;53:730–44.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Gorin SNS,
    2. Jimbo M,
    3. Heizelman R,
    4. Harmes KM,
    5. Harper DM
    . The future of cancer screening after COVID-19 may be at home. Cancer 2021;127:498–503.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Patel S,
    2. Issaka RB,
    3. Chen E,
    4. Somsouk M
    . Colorectal cancer screening and COVID-19. Am J Gastroenterol 2021;116:433–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Myint A,
    2. Roh L,
    3. Yang L,
    4. Connolly L,
    5. Esrailian E,
    6. May FP
    . Noninvasive colorectal cancer screening tests help close screening gaps during Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Gastroenterology 2021;161:712–4.e1.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Scheid DC,
    2. Hamm RM,
    3. Ramakrishnan K,
    4. McCarthy LH,
    5. Mold JW
    , Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network. Improving colorectal cancer screening in family medicine: an Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26:498–507.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    United States Census Bureau. Quick facts Gratiot County, Michigan. US Census. Published 2020. Available at: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/gratiotcountymichigan. Accessed December 13, 2023.
  30. 30.↵
    1. Fedewa SA,
    2. Star J,
    3. Bandi P,
    4. et al
    . Changes in cancer screening in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2215490.
    OpenUrl
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Keywords