Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
LetterCorrespondence

Re: Estimating the Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction of a Quality Improvement Initiative in Primary Care: Findings from EvidenceNOW

Richard A. Young
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2023, jabfm.2023.230230R0; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230230R0
Richard A. Young
Co-Associate Program Director and Director of Research, John Peter Smith Family Medicine Residency Program, Fort Worth, TX
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor: The recent article by Lindner et al concluded, “This [cardiovascular disease] risk reduction would … avoid $150 million in 90-day direct costs.”1 It was grossly irresponsible of the authors to write this and for the editors to publish this.

This medical economic calculation did not apply the methodologies for cost-effectiveness evaluation and reporting that have been followed for over 25 years.2 But we do not even need to understand the intricacies of these extensive guidelines to see the problem. The authors’ “spin” on this issue is identifiable through common sense: they included no upfront costs in their calculation.

They made no effort to include the intervention costs to achieve the preventive outcomes: no clinic visits, medications, lab tests, nothing. My back-of-the-envelope calculation using modest assumptions on cost and utilization (see Table 1) shows that, at a minimum, $3.73 billion must be spent to achieve the $150 million “savings.”

Sloppily reported conclusions like this reinforce the fiction that preventive services save total health care costs. Our national academy, the American Academy of Family Physicians, reinforced this fiction recently when it submitted with the American Medical Association an amici curiae brief to the US Supreme Court that said, “… preventive care … saves money.”3

For the US to achieve a lower-cost, more equitable health care system, Americans must accept the realities of costs and outcomes that every health care system in every other developed country understands. Most often, an ounce of prevention costs a ton of money. Giving a platform to false statements with the imprimatur of scientific truth only digs our country further into a financial hole and delays even further the development of a sustainable national solution to our exorbitant health care costs.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Calculations

Notes

  • This is the Ahead of Print version of the article.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/00/00/000.full.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lindner SR,
    2. Balasubramanian B,
    3. Marino M,
    4. et al
    . Estimating the cardiovascular disease risk reduction of a quality improvement initiative in primary care: findings from EvidenceNOW. J Am Board Fam Med 2023;36:462–76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Neumann PJ,
    2. Sanders GD,
    3. Russell LB,
    4. Siegel JB,
    5. Ganiats TG
    . Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2016.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Waddill K
    . AMA defends Affordable Care Act’s preventive care coverage requirement. Health Payer Intelligence. 2022. Dec 2, 2022. Accessed Jan 18, 2023. Available at: https://healthpayerintelligence.com/news/ama-defends-affordable-care-acts-preventive-care-coverage-requirement.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 38 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 38, Issue 1
January-February 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Re: Estimating the Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction of a Quality Improvement Initiative in Primary Care: Findings from EvidenceNOW
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Re: Estimating the Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction of a Quality Improvement Initiative in Primary Care: Findings from EvidenceNOW
Richard A. Young
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2023, jabfm.2023.230230R0; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230230R0

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Re: Estimating the Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction of a Quality Improvement Initiative in Primary Care: Findings from EvidenceNOW
Richard A. Young
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2023, jabfm.2023.230230R0; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230230R0
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hepatitis C Treatment Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Primary Care Providers—Los Angeles County, 2023
  • Re: Factors Influencing Patient Confidence in Screening Mammography
  • Re: Physician and Advanced Practice Clinician Burnout in Rural and Urban Settings
Show more Correspondence

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire