Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

“They Go Hand in Hand”: Perspectives on the Relationship Between the Core Values of Family Medicine and Abortion Provision Among Family Physicians Who Do Not Oppose Abortion

Sarah Wulf, Diana N. Carvajal, Na’amah Razon, Citlali Perez, Sarah McNeil, Lisa Maldonado, Alison Byrne Fields, Ilana Silverstein and Christine Dehlendorf
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine June 2023, jabfm.2022.220301R2; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.220301R2
Sarah Wulf
From the Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA (SW, CD); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (DNC); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA (NR); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (CP); Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (TEACH), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (SM); Reproductive Health Access Project, New York, NY (LM); Aggregate, Seattle, WA (ABF); Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY (IS)
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diana N. Carvajal
From the Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA (SW, CD); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (DNC); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA (NR); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (CP); Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (TEACH), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (SM); Reproductive Health Access Project, New York, NY (LM); Aggregate, Seattle, WA (ABF); Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY (IS)
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Na’amah Razon
From the Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA (SW, CD); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (DNC); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA (NR); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (CP); Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (TEACH), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (SM); Reproductive Health Access Project, New York, NY (LM); Aggregate, Seattle, WA (ABF); Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY (IS)
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Citlali Perez
From the Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA (SW, CD); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (DNC); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA (NR); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (CP); Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (TEACH), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (SM); Reproductive Health Access Project, New York, NY (LM); Aggregate, Seattle, WA (ABF); Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY (IS)
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah McNeil
From the Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA (SW, CD); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (DNC); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA (NR); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (CP); Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (TEACH), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (SM); Reproductive Health Access Project, New York, NY (LM); Aggregate, Seattle, WA (ABF); Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY (IS)
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Maldonado
From the Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA (SW, CD); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (DNC); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA (NR); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (CP); Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (TEACH), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (SM); Reproductive Health Access Project, New York, NY (LM); Aggregate, Seattle, WA (ABF); Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY (IS)
MA, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alison Byrne Fields
From the Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA (SW, CD); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (DNC); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA (NR); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (CP); Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (TEACH), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (SM); Reproductive Health Access Project, New York, NY (LM); Aggregate, Seattle, WA (ABF); Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY (IS)
MPP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ilana Silverstein
From the Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA (SW, CD); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (DNC); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA (NR); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (CP); Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (TEACH), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (SM); Reproductive Health Access Project, New York, NY (LM); Aggregate, Seattle, WA (ABF); Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY (IS)
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Dehlendorf
From the Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco CA (SW, CD); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (DNC); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA (NR); David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (CP); Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare (TEACH), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (SM); Reproductive Health Access Project, New York, NY (LM); Aggregate, Seattle, WA (ABF); Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY (IS)
MD, MAS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Participants’ Characteristics and Abortion Experience in 2019*

    Total Participants n = 56 (%)
    Gender
     Women43 (76.8)
     Men12 (21.4)
     Non-binary/third gender1 (1.8)
    Race
     Asian9 (16.1)
     Black or African American5 (8.9)
     Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1 (1.8)
     White35 (62.5)
     Other6 (10.7)
    Ethnicity
     Hispanic or Latino/a/x3 (5.4)
     Non-Hispanic or Non-Latino/a/x53 (94.6)
    Age (years)
     ≤301 (1.8)
     31 to 4045 (80.4)
     41 to 505 (8.9)
     51 to 604 (7.1)
     >601 (1.8)
    Regions of the U.S.†
     West23 (41.1)
     South13 (23.2)
     Midwest6 (10.7)
     Northeast14 (25)
    State Abortion Policy Landscape‡
     Hostile20 (35.7)
     Neutral4 (7.1)
     Supportive30 (53.6)
     N/A2 (3.6)
    Approximate distance between physician’s clinical setting and nearest abortion clinic§ (miles)
     <532 (57.1)
     5 to 2515 (26.8)
     26 to 504 (7.1)
     >504 (7.1)
     Unknown1 (1.8)
    Abortion Training
     Aspiration and medication abortion35 (62.5)
     Only aspiration abortion3 (5.4)
     Only medication abortion2 (3.6)
     Neither aspiration nor medication abortion16 (28.6)
    Abortion services provided since graduating residency
     Aspiration and medication abortion16 (28.6)
     Only aspiration abortion0
     Only medication abortion5 (8.9)
     Neither aspiration nor medication abortion35 (62.5)
    Current medication abortion provision
     Currently provides medication abortion17 (30.4)
     Does not currently provide medication abortion39 (69.6)
    Setting of current abortion provision
     Primary care5 (8.9)
     Reproductive health clinic10 (17.9)
     Primary care and reproductive health clinic2 (3.6)
     N/A (Does not provide abortion care)39 (69.6)
    • ↵*Table adapted from Contraception, 2022.11

    • ↵†U.S. Census Bureau, Census Regions and Divisions of the United States, 2013.

    • ↵‡Nash E, State Abortion Policy Landscape: From Hostile to Supportive, Guttmacher Institute, 2019.

    • State categories were based on laws in effect as of July 1, 2020. N/A refers to areas where a state policy landscape was not available.

    • ↵§ANSIRH, Abortion Facility Database, University of California, San Francisco, 2019. Distance was calculated using the zip code of the clinic where the provider works and the address of the closest clinic that offers abortion care in the ANSIRH Facility Database. If a provider works at multiple sites, the zip code of the furthest clinic from an abortion clinic was used.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Additional Quotes on Family Medicine Values and Abortion Provision

    ThemeQuote
    RelationshipsI think that can be a scary situation for patients and especially culturally. For a lot of the patients that I serve, sometimes abortion is not necessarily something that, you know, their family or the people around them might approve of. And so being able to come to a clinic where they know that they can trust a person in there, that it's not – nobody else is gonna find out, that they can walk in and be able to ask questions, I think is really appropriate, or really important (P20, T, NP).
    Care across the lifespanThere's no more common experience that a woman has than like either being pregnant, trying not to be pregnant… just like pregnancy is sort of all about that. I truly then also think prenatal care and preconception care are also a part of family medicine. And an important part of family medicine. So yeah, kind of across the board. Abortion belongs, belongs there (P15, T, NP).
    We're the ones that see the patients the most, and so we should be the ones to be able to help them at all stages of their health care (P4, T, P).
    Whole-person careI would no more deny a patient the option of a medication abortion than I would deny a diabetic person insulin. You know, if that’s what they felt was right for them and it was clinically indicated…I would say abortion is health care…This is an aspect of health care. And we owe it to our patients to provide them excellent care that is consistent with available medical evidence (P28, T, NP).
    Part of the reason why I chose family medicine is because I wanted to treat the whole patient so I think that, you know, saying, like, I will treat the whole patient except for this little area that I don’t feel comfortable treating and I’ll send that off to someone else, seems like kind of a cop out. So, I just – I think that is just another service that you can provide that just treats the whole person (P26, T, NP).
    Non-judgmental careMy beliefs cannot interfere with what a patient may need. Or what a patient may require. So, I think again, there is the selflessness because whether or not I was for or against abortion, if a patient walked in and said, ‘Listen, this is what I need to do that’s best for me.’ Then I have to take myself out of the equation and educate again, give the information, provide the service if I have that capability, because it’s not about what’s best for me, it’s about what’s best for that patient (P27, NT, NP).
    Meeting community needsI think we often feel comfortable doing things that are, that fulfill a need for our patients. And this is like a really great example of something that aligns with our value of providing access for patients(P19, T, P).
    Reconciling valuesIt’s always a very awkward experience for me when one of my patients has an unintended pregnancy and I have to refer them to someone else…I mean literally, I had a patient who came in for an IUD and I did a pregnancy test, she was pregnant, it was not planned. You know, obviously she’s getting an IUD. And, and I think I just wish like in that moment I could’ve just handed her a medication. And instead, it’s like well now I can’t do your IUD. But I can’t hand you a medication, which is much easier to do, I have to actually refer you out. And you have to call someone else. And you have to schedule an appointment and make a visit. …And so, it’s awkward… I know that they would just rather see me, and know me, and talk to me, and have me write them a prescription. And so, I think it’s awkward. And I think it’s disrupt-it’s disruptive to our relationship (P29, T, NP).
    I know that I have the skillset to do these [medication abortions] and it feels foolish that I can't, you know? And I, like I-I've had many patients who I've had to refer to XXX [clinic name]. And it just, it just feels silly… And especially at this program, right? Like we do almost every office procedure you can do. Like toenail removals. All kinds of biopsies, colpo, endometrial biopsies, like whatever it may be. And so, the fact that we refer this out is just A: totally inconsistent with the other work that we do. And then B: just doesn't seem, it just doesn't seem logical (P15, T, NP).
    It's very upsetting for me. For example, the one patient who felt like she financially and emotionally could not handle a child. But she did not get an abortion because she couldn't afford the abortion… I would love to be able to offer something else to those patients. Something that, you know, could help them through an already difficult time and not make their situation worse (P35, NT, NP).
    • Abbreviations: T= Trained in abortion; NT= Not trained in abortion; P= Abortion provider; NP= Non-abortion provider.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 38 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 38, Issue 1
January-February 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
“They Go Hand in Hand”: Perspectives on the Relationship Between the Core Values of Family Medicine and Abortion Provision Among Family Physicians Who Do Not Oppose Abortion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
“They Go Hand in Hand”: Perspectives on the Relationship Between the Core Values of Family Medicine and Abortion Provision Among Family Physicians Who Do Not Oppose Abortion
Sarah Wulf, Diana N. Carvajal, Na’amah Razon, Citlali Perez, Sarah McNeil, Lisa Maldonado, Alison Byrne Fields, Ilana Silverstein, Christine Dehlendorf
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jun 2023, jabfm.2022.220301R2; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220301R2

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
“They Go Hand in Hand”: Perspectives on the Relationship Between the Core Values of Family Medicine and Abortion Provision Among Family Physicians Who Do Not Oppose Abortion
Sarah Wulf, Diana N. Carvajal, Na’amah Razon, Citlali Perez, Sarah McNeil, Lisa Maldonado, Alison Byrne Fields, Ilana Silverstein, Christine Dehlendorf
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jun 2023, jabfm.2022.220301R2; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220301R2
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs
  • Thinking and Practicing Thoughtfully and Thoroughly
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Abortion
  • Family Medicine
  • Family Physicians
  • Qualitative Research
  • Values

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire