Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Development and Validation of Simple Risk Scores to Predict Hospitalization in Outpatients with COVID-19 Including the Omicron Variant

Mark H. Ebell, Roya Hamadani and Autumn Kieber-Emmons
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2022, jabfm.2022.AP.220056; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.AP.220056
Mark H. Ebell
From Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, (MHE); University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (RH, AKE).
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roya Hamadani
From Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, (MHE); University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (RH, AKE).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Autumn Kieber-Emmons
From Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, (MHE); University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA (RH, AKE).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Receiver operating characteristic curves.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of Included Patients in the Derivation and Internal Validation Cohort

    Clinical ParameterNot HospitalizedHospitalizedP Value
    Vital signs
    Mean age41.960.2< 0.001
    Age category
     < 50 years596091 (1.5%)< 0.001
     50 to 59 years163184 (4.9%)
     60 to 69 years1032100 (8.8%)
     70 + years623128 (17.0%)
    Respiratory rate > 30/min3/9246 (0.03%)3/403 (0.74%)< 0.001
    Respiratory rate > 20/min261/9246 (2.8%)43/403 (10.7%)< 0.001
    Oxygen saturation ≤ 95%330/9246 (3.6%)111/403 (27.5%)< 0.001
    Temperature ≥ 100.4 F433/9246 (4.7%)36/403 (8.9%)0.008
    Comorbidities
     Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus806/9246 (8.7%)142/403 (35.2%)< 0.001
     Asthma918/9246 (9.9%)51/403 (12.7%)0.07
     COPD or chronic bronchitis192/9246 (2.1%)68/403 (16.9%)< 0.001
     Hypertension1950/9246 (21.1%)257/403 (63.8%)< 0.001
     Cardiovascular disease356/9246 (3.9%)88/403 (21.8%)< 0.001
     Chronic kidney disease151/9246 (1.6%)55/403 (13.7%)< 0.001
     Chronic liver disease362/9246 (3.9%)40/403 (9.9%)< 0.001
     Cancer340/9246 (3.7%)49/403 (12.2%)< 0.001
     Any of the above comorbidities3028/9246 (32.8%)308/403 (76.4%)< 0.001
    Symptom
     Dyspnea828/9246 (9.0%)168/403 (41.7%)< 0.001
    • Notes: For age, percentage shown is percentage within an age category who were hospitalized. For all other parameters, it is the percentage of hospitalized and non-hospitalized with that comorbidity or parameter.

    • Abbreviation: COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Multivariate Models, Showing Assignment of Points Based on the Beta-Coefficients

    Variableβ-CoefficientP > zβ/Lowest βPoints
    Model A: Base score, AUROCC = 0.847
    Dyspnea1.37400.0001.501.5
    Any comorbidity *1.11460.0001.221
    Age 50 to 59 years0.91650.0001.001
    Age 60 to 69 years1.48850.0001.621.5
    Age 70 + years2.12500.0002.322.5
    Constant−5.0277
    Model B: Adds fever, AUROCC = 0.850
    Dyspnea1.38070.00001.772
    Any comorbidity *1.10590.00001.421.5
    Age 50 to 59 years0.90130.00001.161
    Age 60 to 69 years1.49020.00001.912
    Age 70 + years2.12900.00002.733
    Temperature ≥ 100.40.77980.00201.001
    Constant−5.0753
    Model C: Adds respiratory rate > 20/min, AUROCC = 0.853
    Respiratory rate > 20/min0.86150.0001.111
    Dyspnea1.31670.0001.691.5
    Any comorbidity *1.07530.0001.381.5
    Age 50 to 59 years0.89670.0001.151
    Age 60 to 69 years1.47090.0001.892
    Age 70 + years2.10740.0002.713
    Temperature ≥ 100.40.77840.0021.001
    Constant−5.0856
    Model D: Adds oxygen saturation ≤ 95%, AUROCC = 0.872
    Oxygen saturation ≤ 95%1.49370.0002.372.5
    Dyspnea1.27690.0002.032
    Any comorbidity *1.08100.0001.721.5
    Age 50 to 59 years0.75380.0011.201
    Age 60 to 69 years1.11240.0001.772
    Age 70 + years1.65740.0002.632.5
    Temperature ≥ 100.40.62950.0181.001
    Constant−5.1852
    • ↵Notes: *Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus, asthma, COPD or chronic bronchitis, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, or cancer.

    • Abbreviation: AUROCC, The area under the ROC curve.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Classification Accuracy of 3 Novel Risk Scores and 2 Externally Derived Risk Scores in the Early Derivation, Late Validation, and Omicron Cohorts

    Early Derivation CohortLate Validation CohortOmicron Cohort
    Data Collection: 20 March 2020–28 February 2021Data Collection: 1 March 2021–30 September 2021Data Collection: 20 December 2021–7 January 2022
    Risk Score (Points)n Hospitalized/Total (%)n Hospitalized/Total (%)n Hospitalized/Total (%)
    Overall233/5839 (4.0%)157/3775 (4.2%)74/6138 (1.2%)*
    Model A risk score
     Low (0)9/2660 (0.34%)15/1849 (0.81%)7/3144 (0.22%)
     Moderate (1.0 – 2.5)105/2600 (4.0%)84/1623 (5.2%)34/2613 (1.3%)
     High (≥ 3.0)120/583 (20.6%)70/334 (21.0%)33/381 (8.7%)
    Model B risk score
     Low (0 – 1.0)15/3188 (0.47%)19/2135 (0.89%)7/1724 (0.41%)
     Moderate (1.5 – 3.5)96/2035 (4.7%)80/1320 (6.1%)22/1302 (1.7%)
     High (≥ 4.0)123/620 (19.8%)70/351 (19.9%)35/327 (10.7%)
    Model C risk score
     Low (0 – 1.0)14/3172 (0.44%)18/2119 (0.85%)7/1823 (0.38%)
     Moderate (1.5-3.5)98/2043 (4.8%)82/1328 (6.2%)20/1478 (1.4%)
     High (≥ 4.0)131/637 (20.6%)69/359 (19.2%)42/445 (9.4%)
    Model D risk score
     Low (0 – 1.0)10/3205 (0.33%)16/2020 (0.79%)5/2106 (0.24%)
     Moderate (1.5- 4.5)106/2349 (4.5%)79/1481 (5.3%)28/2026 (1.4%)
     High (≥ 5.0)117/465 (25.2%)74/305 (24.3%)50/356 (14.0%)
    COVID-NoLab risk score
     Low (0 to 1)142/3544 (4.0%)70/2488 (2.8%)12/2081 (0.6%)
     Moderate (2 to 5)259/2254 (11.5%)132/1302 (10.1%)45/1253 (3.6%)
     High (≥ 6)29/45 (64.4%)9/16 (56.3%)7/19 (36.8%)
    OutCoV risk score
     Low (< 3)163/4340 (3.8%)81/2929 (2.8%)18/2534 (0.71%)
     Moderate (3.0 – 5.0)220/1392 (15.8%)112/818 (13.7%)32/769 (4.2%)
     High (≥ 5.5)47/111 (42.3%)18/59 (30.5%)14/50 (28.0%)
    • ↵Notes: * For the subset with measured temperature available used for risk scores B-D, there were 64 hospitalizations out of 3353 outpatients (1.9%).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 38 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 38, Issue 1
January-February 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development and Validation of Simple Risk Scores to Predict Hospitalization in Outpatients with COVID-19 Including the Omicron Variant
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Development and Validation of Simple Risk Scores to Predict Hospitalization in Outpatients with COVID-19 Including the Omicron Variant
Mark H. Ebell, Roya Hamadani, Autumn Kieber-Emmons
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2022, jabfm.2022.AP.220056; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.AP.220056

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Development and Validation of Simple Risk Scores to Predict Hospitalization in Outpatients with COVID-19 Including the Omicron Variant
Mark H. Ebell, Roya Hamadani, Autumn Kieber-Emmons
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2022, jabfm.2022.AP.220056; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.AP.220056
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Strengths and Limitations
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Clinical Prediction Rule
  • COVID-19
  • Family Medicine
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Mobile Applications
  • Outpatients
  • Pennsylvania
  • Retrospective Studies
  • SARS-CoV-2 Variants

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire