Preemployment Evaluations: Dilemmas For The Family Physician

Abstract

Preemployment evaluations present primary care physicians with numerous medical, ethical, and legal dilemmas. These examinations are especially problematic for community-based primary care providers unaccustomed to standards used by physicians in occupational settings. In response to a mailed questionnaire, 255 family physicians and general practitioners described their current methods of performing these examinations. Forty percent reported that employers routinely provide no information about the job for which the prospective employee is being evaluated. Respondents differed according to number and type of laboratory tests routinely included as part of a preemployment evaluation and in the proportion of prospective employees disqualified on the basis of the examination. Twenty-four percent reported no disqualifications, and 34 percent disqualified 5 percent or more. The percentage reporting medical and psychological information also varied. One-half routinely reported alcohol and drug abuse to employers, and of these, only one-half obtained a waiver for the release of such information. Five of every 6 physicians believed that it was more important to “tell the truth to the employer” than to “protect the interests of the employee.” Our findings show that no consensus exists among the primary care physicians in our survey about the performance of preemployment evaluations. Because this can have serious consequences to workers, employers, and physicians, we propose guidelines for primary care physicians who perform preemployment evaluations.