Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Clinician-Reported Barriers and Needs for Implementation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Tristen Hall, Meredith K. Warman, Tamara Oser, Melissa K. Filippi, Brian Manning, Jennifer K. Carroll, Donald E. Nease, Elizabeth W. Staton and Sean Oser
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2024, 37 (4) 671-679; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240049R1
Tristen Hall
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO; American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, KS.
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meredith K. Warman
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO; American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, KS.
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tamara Oser
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO; American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, KS.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa K. Filippi
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO; American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, KS.
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Manning
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO; American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, KS.
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer K. Carroll
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO; American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, KS.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald E. Nease Jr
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO; American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, KS.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth W. Staton
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO; American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, KS.
MSTC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean Oser
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO; American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network, Leawood, KS.
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Guide for Interviews Conducted with US Primary Care Physicians, NPs and PAs (n = 55), 2020

    1.  Now I’d like to understand a typical visit for a patient with diabetes, including the use of CGM. Think about a day you saw one or more patients with diabetes. Tell me about what caring for those patients is like.
    2.  In your experience, what are the greatest barriers to prescribing or encouraging the use of CGM to your patients with diabetes?
    3.  In your experience, what are the greatest facilitators to prescribing or encouraging the use of CGM to your patients with diabetes?
    4.  What resources would you need to feel comfortable prescribing CGM to your patients with diabetes (more often)?
    5.  Overall, what do you think about CGM?
    • Abbreviations: NPs, nurse practitioners; PAs, physician assistants; CGM, continuous glucose monitoring.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Interview Participant Characteristics (n = 55 US Primary Care Physicians, NPs and PAs), 2020

    Participant characteristic%n
    Professional role
     Attending, faculty, or community physician78.243
     Resident physician7.34
     Nurse practitioner or physician assistant14.68
    Primary setting
     Private practice23.613
     Federally qualified health center or similar21.812
     Hospital-owned practice20.011
     Academic medical center14.68
     Community health center10.96
     Other9.15
    Specialty
     Family medicine83.646
     Internal medicine7.34
     Internal medicine-pediatrics1.81
     None specified7.34
    Years since training
     05.53
     1 to 530.917
     6 to 1021.812
     11 to 1516.49
     16 to 203.62
     More than 2021.812
    CGM experience
     Heard of but never had patients on CGM20.011
     Had patients on CGM but never prescribed43.624
     Have prescribed CGM36.420
    Likelihood to prescribe CGM
     Not at all likely12.77
     Somewhat likely32.718
     Moderately likely18.210
     Very likely36.420
    Geographic location
     Rural38.221
    Distance from endocrinologist
     ≤40 miles69.138
     >40 miles30.917
    Payer mix
     Medicare – 50% or less83.646
     Medicaid – 50% or less74.641
     Private – 50% or less81.845
     No insurance – 50% or less94.451
    Region of United States
     Northeast9.15
     Midwest21.812
     South12.77
     West56.431
    Sample cluster
     AAFP NRN54.530
     Meta-LARC45.525
    • Abbreviations: NPs, nurse practitioners; PAs, physician assistants; CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; AAFP NRN, American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network; Meta-LARC, Meta-network Learning and Research Center.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Resources to Support Patient Education on CGM Suggested by US Primary Care Physicians, NPs and PAs (n = 55), 2020

    CategoryContentFormat and Considerations
    Patient education materials
    • The benefits of using CGM

    • Pamphlets or handouts that patients could view in the office and take home; this format could also benefit patients without internet access

    • Consider reading level and include languages other than English

    • The difference between CGM and traditional glucose meter

    • How to properly apply and use the sensor

    • How to interpret and act on CGM readings (e.g., how to adjust insulin dosing or medications)

    Sample CGM device in office
    • A CGM device in their office for patient demonstrations

    • The hands-on experience could increase both patients’ comfort and confidence in using the device and clinicians’ comfort with prescribing

    Additional personnel in practice
    • Staff for one-on-one patient support and education

    • Registered nurses

    • Additional staff and clinicians who are knowledgeable about CGM and can assist patients if the prescribing clinician were unavailable

    • Diabetes care and education specialists

    • Clinical pharmacists

    Integration of CGM data into electronic health record (EHR)
    • Ongoing transfer of CGM data from patients’ device

    • Integration and compatibility with practice’s current EHR system

    • CGM data available to review in patient’s EHR record during visit

    • Abbreviations: NPs, nurse practitioners; PAs, physician assistants; CGM, continuous glucose monitoring.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Educational Topics of Interest for Practice Teams Identified in Interviews with Primary Care Physicians, NPs and PAs (n = 55), 2020

    • Benefits and health outcomes from using CGM

    • How to properly apply and use the sensor

    • How to interpret and act on CGM readings

    • Which patients would be appropriate candidates for CGM

    • Differences between the various CGM systems (e.g. personal/professional or different manufacturers)

    • Better understanding of how CGM glucose readings and capillary glucose readings differ

    • Insurance coverage questions:

    • o. Patient eligibility for insurance coverage

    • o. What specifically would be covered (e.g., initial device, number of sensors per month, percentage of cost covered)

    • o. The prior authorization process

    • o. Step-by-step guide as to what information and documentation is needed to ensure coverage

    • o. List of which insurance providers cover CGM

    • o. Checklist or standardized forms for prior authorizations

    • Abbreviations: NPs, nurse practitioners; PAs, physician assistants; CGM, continuous glucose monitoring.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 37 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 37, Issue 4
July-August 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinician-Reported Barriers and Needs for Implementation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Clinician-Reported Barriers and Needs for Implementation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Tristen Hall, Meredith K. Warman, Tamara Oser, Melissa K. Filippi, Brian Manning, Jennifer K. Carroll, Donald E. Nease, Elizabeth W. Staton, Sean Oser
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2024, 37 (4) 671-679; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240049R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinician-Reported Barriers and Needs for Implementation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring
Tristen Hall, Meredith K. Warman, Tamara Oser, Melissa K. Filippi, Brian Manning, Jennifer K. Carroll, Donald E. Nease, Elizabeth W. Staton, Sean Oser
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2024, 37 (4) 671-679; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240049R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Artificial Intelligence and Family Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Continuous Glucose Monitoring
  • Primary Care Physicians
  • Primary Health Care
  • Qualitative Research
  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Wearable Technology

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire