Physician Satisfaction Should Be the Measure of Electronic Health Record Quality for the Nation

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Hendrix N,
   2. Phillips RL,
   3. Bazemore AW

   . Only one quarter of family physicians are very satisfied with their electronic health records platform. J Am Board Fam Med. 2024; In Press.
2. 2.↵
   Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network (ACORN). Virginia Commonwealth University. Accessed Sept, 2023. Available at: https://www.acornvirginia.org/.
3. 3.↵
   1. Steinbrook R

   . Health care and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. N Engl J Med 2009;12:1057–60.

   OpenUrl
4. 4.↵
   National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Implementing high-quality primary care: rebuilding the foundation of health care. National Academies Press. Accessed May, 2021. Available at: https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/implementing-high-quality-primary-care.
5. 5.↵
   National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Achieving Whole Health: A New Approach for Veterans and the Nation. National Academies Press; 2023.
6. 6.↵
   1. Krist AH,
   2. Phillips R,
   3. Leykum L,
   4. Olmedo B

   . Digital health needs for implementing high-quality primary care: recommendations from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; Nov 25;28(12):2738–2742.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Arndt BG,
   2. Beasley JW,
   3. Watkinson MD,
   4. et al

   . Tethered to the EHR: primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Ann Fam Med 2017;15:419–26.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Anderson J,
   2. Leubner J,
   3. Brown SR

   . EHR overtime: an analysis of time spent after hours by family physicians. Fam Med 2020;52:135–7.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 9.↵
   National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Taking action against clinician burnout: a systems approach to professional well-being. The National Academies Press; 2019.