Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Increased Organizational Stress in Primary Care: Understanding the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic, Medicaid Expansion, and Practice Ownership

Jacqueline B. Britz, Alison N. Huffstetler, E. Marshall Brooks, Alicia Richards, Roy T. Sabo, Ben K. Webel, Neil McCray and Alex H. Krist
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2023, 36 (6) 892-904; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230145R2
Jacqueline B. Britz
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (JBB, ANH, EMB, AR, RTS, BKW, AHK), Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (ANH), Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services, Richmond, VA (NMC).
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alison N. Huffstetler
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (JBB, ANH, EMB, AR, RTS, BKW, AHK), Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (ANH), Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services, Richmond, VA (NMC).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Marshall Brooks
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (JBB, ANH, EMB, AR, RTS, BKW, AHK), Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (ANH), Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services, Richmond, VA (NMC).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alicia Richards
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (JBB, ANH, EMB, AR, RTS, BKW, AHK), Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (ANH), Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services, Richmond, VA (NMC).
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roy T. Sabo
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (JBB, ANH, EMB, AR, RTS, BKW, AHK), Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (ANH), Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services, Richmond, VA (NMC).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ben K. Webel
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (JBB, ANH, EMB, AR, RTS, BKW, AHK), Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (ANH), Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services, Richmond, VA (NMC).
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil McCray
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (JBB, ANH, EMB, AR, RTS, BKW, AHK), Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (ANH), Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services, Richmond, VA (NMC).
PhD, MPP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex H. Krist
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (JBB, ANH, EMB, AR, RTS, BKW, AHK), Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC (ANH), Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services, Richmond, VA (NMC).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    A. 2022 Primary care practice distribution in Virginia (n = 2,296). B. 2022 Primary care practice survey response distribution in Virginia (n = 526).

  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics and Services of Primary Care Practices in 2022 Compared with 2018

    2022 (N, %)2018 (N, %)
    Response Rate526/2296 (22.9%)481/1622 (29.7%)VirginiaP-Value*
    Characteristics
     Practice Specialty
      Family Medicine/Internal Medicine438/526 (83.3%)479/481 (99.6%)1930/2,296 (84.0%)<0.0001
      OB/GYN10/526 (1.9%)0/481 (0%)94/2,296 (4.1%)0.0020
      Pediatrics78/526 (14.8%)2/481 (0.4%)272/2,296 (11.8%)<0.0001
     Practice location by zip code
      Rural254/526 (48.3%)254/479 (53.0%)1020/2,296 (44.4%)0.1710
      Suburban154/526 (29.3%)140/479 (29.2%)755/2,296 (32.9%)<0.9999
      Urban118/526 (22.4%)85/479 (17.8%)513/2,296 (22.3%)0.0714
     Ownership
      Hospital/health system216/506 (42.7%)107/427 (25.1%)806/2,296 (35%)<0.0001
      Clinician196/506 (38.7%)228/427 (53.4%)–±<0.0001
      Clinician partially-owned5/506 (1.0%)11/427 (2.6%)–0.0509
      Private sponsor/investor/corporation79/506 (15.6%)76/427 (17.8%)–0.4205
      Insurance company0/506 (0.0%)0/427 (0.0%)––
      University5/506 (1.0%)5/427 (1.2%)–>0.9999
      Government5/506 (1.0%)0/427 (0.0%)–0.0663
     Role of respondent completing practice survey
      Office Manager239/526 (45.4%)–––
      Administrative Personnel77/526 (14.6%)–––
      Physician, Physician Assistant, Nurse Practitioner118/526 (22.4%)–––
      Nurse6/526 (1.1%)–––
      Other80/526 (15.2%)–––
      Not answered6/526 (1.1%)–––
     Mean estimated payer mix for practices±±
      Medicare23.8%29.4%–<0.0001
      Medicaid21.8%12.1%–<0.0001
      Commercial/private insurance45.4%48.4%–0.0879
      Uninsured/self-pay8.9%10.1%–0.2625
     Practices accepting new patients with:
      Medicare399/489 (81.6%)378/430 (87.9%)–0.0108
      Medicaid399/507 (78.7%)295/430 (68.6%)–0.0006
      Commercial/private insurance465/507 (91.7%)418/437 (95.6%)–0.0203
      Uninsured437/503 (86.9%)382/426 (89.7%)–0.2260
    Population Demographics
     Estimated patients by race±±
      White59.5%67.4%–<0.0001
      Black26.6%23.5%–0.0256
      Asian or Pacific Islander6.0%8.5%–0.0105
      Native American or Alaska Native1.0%3.0%–0.0018
      Other6.9%–––
     Estimated percentage of Hispanic patients21.7%11.1%
     Care for vulnerable populations
      Low income437/512 (85.4%)–––
      Group home258/512 (50.4%)––
      Undocumented156/512 (30.5%)–––
      Refugee/special visa128/512 (25.0%)–––
      Transgender274/512 (53.5%)–––
      Homeless220/512 (43.0%)–––
      Non-English speaking339/512 (66.2%)–––
      Opioid use disorder222/512 (43.4%)–––
      No vulnerable people47/512 (9.2%)–––
    • ↵*P value comparing values for 2022 versus 2018.

    • ±refers to data not available or not included in analysis (e.g., questions not included in the 2018 survey).

    • ±±Two sample t test was used to compare means between two groups.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Primary Care Efforts to Ensure Access and Comprehensiveness of Care in 2022 versus 2018

    2022 (N, %)2018 (N, %)P-Value
    Number of practices with this type of team member
     Psychologist68/526 (12.9%)13/484 (2.7%)<0.0001
     Licensed Clinical Social Worker or Professional Counselor118/526 (22.4%)45/484 (9.3%)<0.0001
     Case manager, care coordinator, or patient navigator169/526 (32.1%)78/484 (16.1%)<0.0001
     Pharmacist75/526 (14.3%)–*–
    Population health services
     Measure your quality/performance353/499 (70.7%)362/484 (74.8%)0.1755
     Have alerts/reminders in your EHR356/499 (71.3%)––
     Provide care management for chronic conditions338/499 (67.7%)––
     Provide care coordination or patient navigation321/499 (64.3%)299/484 (61.8%)0.4456
     Promote generic medication prescribing316/499 (63.3%)––
     Follow-up after ER visit/hospitalization286/499 (57.3%)––
     Follow-up with patients referred to a specialist230/499 (46.1%)––
     Use a registry to identify patients in need of care228/499 (45.7%)263/484 (54.3%)0.0081
     Have strategies to reduce unnecessary medical care203/499 (40.7%)––
     Have a patient advice line123/499 (24.7%)––
     Communicate with patients’ health care coordinator120/499 (24.1%)––
     None of the above24/499 (4.8%)––
    Services practices were able to provide during COVID-19
     Messaging/education about distancing and masks414/487 (85.0%)––
     Viral testing to diagnose acute infections in our office318/487 (65.3%)––
     Antibody testing to diagnose acute/past infections206/487 (42.3%)––
     Hospital management for our acutely ill patients141/487 (29.0%)––
     Antibody treatment-high risk patients with acute infections95/487 (19.5%)––
     Home monitoring for patients with acute infections106/487 (21.8%)––
     Manage Long Covid100/487 (20.5%)––
     Patient education on efficacy and safety of the vaccine395/487 (81.1%)––
     Give COVID-19 vaccinations to our patients276/487 (56.7%)––
    Telehealth
     Visit type – average (range)
     In-person90.0% (5.3, 100.0)––
     Telehealth10.0% (0.0, 94.7)––
     Type of telehealth – average (range)
     Video74.6% (0.0, 100.0)––
     Telephone25.4% (0.0, 100.0)––
    • Note. *refers to question not included in 2018 survey.

    • Abbreviation: EHR, electronic health record.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Stresses Experienced by Primary Care Practices in 2018 versus 2022

    2022 (N, %)2018 (N, %)P-Value
    Practice Stress
     Report any stress280/526 (53.2%)163/484 (33.7%)<0.0001
     Have a major office renovation*44/280 (15.7%)55/163 (33.7%)<0.0001
     Adopt a new electronic health record system38/280 (13.6%)43/163 (26.4%)0.0012
     Adopt a new billing system34/280 (12.1%)32/163 (19.6%)0.0459
     Change in practice ownership30/280 (10.7%)13/163 (8.0%)0.4397
     Move office to a new location28/280 (10.0%)29/163 (17.8%)0.0268
     Lost 1+ doctor, NP, or PA222/280 (79.3%)64/163 (39.3%)<0.0001
     Planned retirement±70/180 (38.9%)–±±–
     Early retirement78/180 (43.3%)––
     Moved103/180 (57.2%)––
     Changed practice106/180 (58.9%)––
     Fired28/180 (15.6%)––
     Died5/180 (2.8%)––
    COVID-19 Impact on Practice Clinicians and Staff
     Reduced or held pay for clinicians and staff157/461 (34.1%)––
     Still struggling to recover financially183/461 (39.7%)––
     1+ of our clinicians or staff got COVID-19355/461 (77.0%)––
     1+ of our clinicians or staff died from COVID-196/461 (1.3%)––
     Clinicians/staff are suffering from burnout or mental exhaustion325/461 (70.5%)––
    State of Mental Health Care
     Difficulty referring patients to mental health services56.20%––
     Have mental health providers in clinic18.30%––
    • Notes. *Calculated from responses of practices reporting any stress.

    • ↵±Calculated from responses of practices who lost 1+ doctor, NP, or PA; not all practices provided reasons for losing clinicians.

    • ±±refers to question not included in 2018 survey.

    • Abbreviations: NP, nurse practitioner; PA, physician assistant.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Qualitative Interview Themes from 2022 Participant Interviews

    ThemesFindingsQuotes
    General burnout
    • • Practices report high levels of stress, burnout, and moral injury

    • • EHR use felt to compromise person-centered care

    • • Administrative work with insurance contributing to sense of disenchantment with the profession

    • • We're burnt out, we all admit to each other. Not only the clinicians, but the nurses too. Pretty much everybody is just exhausted.

    • • So when you talk about physician burnout, they’re there. Which is sad because I have amazing physicians that I work for who are phenomenal, who care deeply for their patients. And the thing that's getting in their way right now is the bureaucracy of the EMR. Are you putting the things in the right places, are you checking the boxes.

    • • The complicated administrative work with insurance is a nightmare…Instead of improving the knowledge base, instead of facilitating processes to improve the care of patients, we have this monstrous machine that has been created.

    • • We don't get paid for taking care of patients. We get paid for doing [things] to them. And the electronic medical record (EMR) is kind of like a cash register. It's not really about taking care of a patient. It's about did you click this right button?

    Financial stress from COVID-19
    • • Practices still recovering from financial strain accrued during COVID-19

    • • Financial stresses due to low volume of patients and payment for COVID-19 tests and vaccines

    • • We had a lot of struggles getting payers to pay for COVID tests.

    • • COVID was really tough for us. We are an independent practice and so it was difficult and we still have not fully recovered from the hit.

    • • [The Director of Medicaid] sent a memo saying COVID vaccines will be paid $40 for Medicaid patients. But a lot of Managed Care Organizations (MCO)s did not pay that until later on, or it was rejected, like by Anthem HealthKeepers. Or was rejected first and then later on they only paid us like $15 or $20.

    • • As a consequence of COVID we no longer have that office.

    Loss of staff and clinicians
    • • Practices stressed with high rates of staff turnover and chronic shortage of clinicians

    • • Practices lack capacity to meet demand for primary care

    • • I'm always struggling because I don't ever have enough people. And it seems like as soon as I get just enough people to get by, someone's leaving or we have a new clinical need.

    • • That to me is the biggest thing that I'm burnt out on. It’s constant re-onboarding, retraining, redoing the whole thing. It's costing us thousands of dollars a person.

    • • We are struggling. We are very stressed. We've lost a lot of providers. Not just providers, actually, but everybody in the healthcare system. At every level people have left.

    • • This is an organization where people tend to stay for a long time and our staff turnover was below 10% before COVID. But in the past two years, it's been like 35%. We've got 225 employees; we had to rehire 75 employees in the first year, and something close to that in the second year.

    Primary care reimbursement
    • • Medicaid payments insufficient to adequately care for population

    • • Medicaid is really a challenge because it's really underpaying me.

    • • I feel like payment for Medicaid has not kept up with the expenses of a practice.

    • • All those added administrative burdens are really bad…It's just one of those things that I think Medicaid should listen to, like, I'm saving your patients from going to the emergency room, after all my clinic is right across from the ER. So there’s different kinds of support that I really need to help these families.

    • • I could say I won't see you again because I don't accept Medicaid anymore. And if that happens, the majority of my patients will probably not be seen anywhere else except in the emergency room.

    Health system ownership
    • • Unsupported mandates from health systems

    • • Lack of health system support for primary care

    • • Independent practice recruitment struggles

    • • Benefits of a health system

    • • One of my partners resigned last summer…because of partnering with [the health system], because of their insistence on things that were not necessary and weren't part of our agreement. I too nearly resigned twice within 12 months and looked at a Plan B of what else would I do?

    • • They have this big emphasis on resilience. What I can't get them to understand is how to better take care of people in the office. And to do that you’ve got to fix the system too. And they are very much into telling you great things about how to be more resilient. Hell, I'm pretty resilient. I'm still here after four decades. But what we need help with is the system, improving systems of care, so that I can spend my time doing Doctor level stuff.

    • • The hospital systems that I'm employed by, they get the money, and it doesn’t go to primary care…Instead, it goes to the Accountable Care Organization (ACO), it goes to the hospital system, it goes to whatever group the primary care doctor is working for. It’s not designated as this money is for primary care.

    • • We have great difficulty recruiting new doctors to the organization. We are competing with hospital-based hiring that pays brand new primary care physicians high salaries and gives them a high benefit package, which they deserve. We of course try to sell [new recruits] on the other features; more personal care, more personal involvement, maybe even the possibility of buying into the practices and owner as a partner. There's a lot more that can be offered in some regards, but not financially.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 36 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 36, Issue 6
November-December 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Increased Organizational Stress in Primary Care: Understanding the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic, Medicaid Expansion, and Practice Ownership
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Increased Organizational Stress in Primary Care: Understanding the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic, Medicaid Expansion, and Practice Ownership
Jacqueline B. Britz, Alison N. Huffstetler, E. Marshall Brooks, Alicia Richards, Roy T. Sabo, Ben K. Webel, Neil McCray, Alex H. Krist
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2023, 36 (6) 892-904; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230145R2

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Increased Organizational Stress in Primary Care: Understanding the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic, Medicaid Expansion, and Practice Ownership
Jacqueline B. Britz, Alison N. Huffstetler, E. Marshall Brooks, Alicia Richards, Roy T. Sabo, Ben K. Webel, Neil McCray, Alex H. Krist
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2023, 36 (6) 892-904; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230145R2
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Appendix.
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Health Policy
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Family Medicine
  • Health Workforce
  • Medically Underserved Area
  • Medicaid
  • Pandemics
  • Practice-based Research
  • Primary Health Care
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Virginia

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire