Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Points of Concordance, Points of Discordance: A Qualitative Examination of Telemedicine Implementation

Tristen L. Hall, Lauri Connelly, Elizabeth W. Staton, Jodi Summers Holtrop, Amber Sieja, Kyle Knierim and Heather Holmstrom
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2022, 35 (3) 517-526; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.210325
Tristen L. Hall
From University of Colorado Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO (TLH, LC, EWS, JSH, KK, HH); University of Colorado Department of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado (AS).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauri Connelly
From University of Colorado Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO (TLH, LC, EWS, JSH, KK, HH); University of Colorado Department of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado (AS).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth W. Staton
From University of Colorado Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO (TLH, LC, EWS, JSH, KK, HH); University of Colorado Department of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado (AS).
MSTC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jodi Summers Holtrop
From University of Colorado Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO (TLH, LC, EWS, JSH, KK, HH); University of Colorado Department of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado (AS).
PhD, MCHES
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amber Sieja
From University of Colorado Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO (TLH, LC, EWS, JSH, KK, HH); University of Colorado Department of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado (AS).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyle Knierim
From University of Colorado Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO (TLH, LC, EWS, JSH, KK, HH); University of Colorado Department of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado (AS).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather Holmstrom
From University of Colorado Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO (TLH, LC, EWS, JSH, KK, HH); University of Colorado Department of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado (AS).
MD, FAAFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Fisk M,
    2. Livingstone A,
    3. Pit SW
    . Telehealth in the context of COVID-19: changing perspectives in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e19264.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Patel SY,
    2. Mehrotra A,
    3. Huskamp HA,
    4. Uscher-Pines L,
    5. Ganguli I,
    6. Barnett ML
    . Variation in telemedicine use and outpatient care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood) 2021;40:349–58.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Knierim K,
    2. Palmer C,
    3. Kramer ES,
    4. et al
    . Lessons learned during COVID-19 that can move telehealth in primary care forward. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:S196–S202.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    NEJM Catalyst [Internet]. What is telehealth? N Engl J Med Catal; 2018. Available from: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.18.0268.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Monaghesh E,
    2. Hajizadeh A
    . The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence. BMC Public Health 2020;20:1193.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hong Y-R,
    2. Lawrence J,
    3. Williams D Jr.,
    4. Mainousi A III.
    . Population-level interest and telehealth capacity of US hospitals in response to COVID-19: cross-sectional analysis of Google search and national hospital survey data. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2020;6:e18961.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Jetty A,
    2. Jabbarpour Y,
    3. Westfall M,
    4. Kamerow DB,
    5. Petterson S,
    6. Westfall JM
    . Capacity of primary care to deliver telehealth in the United States. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34;S48–S54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Larry A. Green Center [Internet]. Quick COVID-19 Primary Care Survey; 2020. Available from: https://www.green-center.org/covid-survey.
  9. 9.↵
    AAFP [Internet]. AAFP advocacy focus: telehealth and telemedicine; 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 29] Available from: https://www.aafp.org/advocacy/advocacy-topics/health-it/telehealth-telemedicine.html.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Thomson K
    [Internet]. Congress: act now to ensure telehealth access for Medicare beneficiaries. Health Affairs Blog; 2021. Available from: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20210505.751442/full/.
  11. 11.↵
    1. North S
    . These four telehealth changes should stay, even after the pandemic. FPM 2021;28:9–11.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hammersley V,
    2. Donaghy E,
    3. Parker R,
    4. et al
    . Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2019;69:e595–e604.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Barney A,
    2. Buckelew S,
    3. Mesheriakova V,
    4. Raymond-Flesch M
    . The COVID-19 pandemic and rapid implementation of adolescent and young adult telemedicine: challenges and opportunities for innovation. J Adolesc Health 2020;37:164–71.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ramaswamy A,
    2. Yu M,
    3. Drangsholt S,
    4. et al
    . Patient satisfaction with telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: retrospective cohort study. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e20786.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Shigekawa E,
    2. Fix M,
    3. Corbett G,
    4. Roby DH,
    5. Coffman J
    . The current state of telehealth evidence: a rapid review. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018;37:1975–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Mann DM,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Chunara R,
    4. Testa PA,
    5. Nov O
    . COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: evidence from the field. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020;27:1132–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Rodriguez JA,
    2. Betancourt JR,
    3. Sequist TD,
    4. Ganguli I
    . Differences in the use of telephone and video telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Manag Care 2021;27:21–6.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Harden SM,
    3. Gaglio B,
    4. et al
    . RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. Front Public Health 2019;7:64.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    RE-AIM [Internet]. Welcome to RE-AIM and PRISM: implementation in context; 2021 [cited 2021 June 16]. Available from: https://www.re-aim.org/.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Taylor B,
    2. Henshall C,
    3. Kenyon S,
    4. Litchfield I,
    5. Greenfield S
    . Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis. BMJ Open 2018;8:e019993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Palinkas LA,
    2. Mendon SJ,
    3. Hamilton AB
    . Innovations in mixed methods evaluations. Annu Rev Public Health 2019;40:423–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Nevedal AL,
    2. Reardon CM,
    3. Opra Widerquist MA,
    4. et al
    . Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Implement Sci 2021;16:67.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Guetterman TC,
    2. Fetters MD,
    3. Creswell JW
    . Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Ann Fam Med 2015;13:554–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kwan BM,
    2. McGinnes HL,
    3. Ory MG,
    4. Estabrooks PA,
    5. Waxmonsky JA,
    6. Glasgow RE
    . RE-AIM in the real world: use of the RE-AIM framework for program planning and evaluation in clinical and community settings. Front Public Health 2019;7:345.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Holtrop JS,
    2. Rabin BA,
    3. Glasgow RE
    . Qualitative approaches to use of the RE-AIM framework: rationale and methods. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:177.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Jabbarpour Y,
    2. Jetty A,
    3. Westfall M,
    4. Westfall J
    . Not telehealth: which primary care visits need in-person care? J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:S162–S169.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Gagnon M-P,
    2. Duplantie J,
    3. Fortin J-P,
    4. Landry R
    . Implementing telehealth to support medical practice in rural/remote regions: what are the conditions for success? Implement Sci 2006;1:18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Gomez T,
    2. Anaya YB,
    3. Shih KJ,
    4. Tarn DM
    . A qualitative study of primary care physicians' experiences with telemedicine during COVID-19. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:S61–S70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Eberly LA,
    2. Kallan MJ,
    3. Julien HM,
    4. et al
    . Patient characteristics associated with telemedicine access for primary and specialty ambulatory care during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2031640.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Reed ME,
    2. Huang J,
    3. Graetz I,
    4. et al
    . Patient characteristics associated with choosing a telemedicine visit vs office visit with the same primary care clinicians. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e205873.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Krishnaswami A,
    2. Beavers C,
    3. Dorsch MP,
    4. et al
    . Gerotechnology for older adults with cardiovascular diseases: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:2650–70.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Rajasekaran K
    . Access to telemedicine—are we doing all that we can during the COVID-19 pandemic? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;163:104–6.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Tarn DM,
    2. Hintz C,
    3. Mendez-Hernandez E,
    4. Sawlani SP,
    5. Bholat MA
    . Using virtual visits to care for primary care patients with COVID-19 symptoms. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:S147–S151.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 35 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 35, Issue 3
May/June 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Points of Concordance, Points of Discordance: A Qualitative Examination of Telemedicine Implementation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Points of Concordance, Points of Discordance: A Qualitative Examination of Telemedicine Implementation
Tristen L. Hall, Lauri Connelly, Elizabeth W. Staton, Jodi Summers Holtrop, Amber Sieja, Kyle Knierim, Heather Holmstrom
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2022, 35 (3) 517-526; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.210325

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Points of Concordance, Points of Discordance: A Qualitative Examination of Telemedicine Implementation
Tristen L. Hall, Lauri Connelly, Elizabeth W. Staton, Jodi Summers Holtrop, Amber Sieja, Kyle Knierim, Heather Holmstrom
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2022, 35 (3) 517-526; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.210325
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Care Redesign to Support Telemedicine Implementation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Federally Qualified Health Center Personnel Experiences
  • The "Telehealth Divide"--Who Are the Underserved, and What Care Is Improved?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Information Technology
  • Nonverbal Communication
  • Primary Health Care
  • Qualitative Methods
  • Telemedicine

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire