RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Points of Concordance, Points of Discordance: A Qualitative Examination of Telemedicine Implementation
JF The Journal of the American Board of Family
                Medicine
JO J Am Board Fam Med
FD American Board of Family Medicine
SP 517
OP 526
DO 10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.210325
VO 35
IS 3
A1 Tristen L. Hall
A1 Lauri Connelly
A1 Elizabeth W. Staton
A1 Jodi Summers Holtrop
A1 Amber Sieja
A1 Kyle Knierim
A1 Heather Holmstrom
YR 2022
UL http://www.jabfm.org/content/35/3/517.abstract
AB Introduction: Health systems undertook a rapid transition to increase the use of telemedicine in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. A continued need for telemedicine services in the coming years is likely. This article examines telemedicine from multiple stakeholders' perspectives considering reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) outcomes.Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with primary care practice team members and patients. Rapid qualitative analysis was used to identify themes in experiences and perceptions related to telemedicine implementation. The RE-AIM implementation framework was applied to thematic findings to understand influences on implementation outcomes.Results: Twenty-four practice members and 17 patients across 5 clinics participated. All stakeholder groups reported that technological capabilities influenced patients' access to telemedicine and that certain patients and reasons for visits were not appropriate for telemedicine. All groups felt that telemedicine was a good option for some patients some of the time but not all patients all of the time.Discussion: Telemedicine works well if it is used for the appropriate visits and patient types and with needed technological elements. Older age may limit the feasibility of telehealth for some patients. Added administrative work and associated costs support systematic screening to determine visit appropriateness for telemedicine.