Telemedicine in Primary Care: Qualitative Work Towards a Framework for Appropriate Use

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Hollander JE,
   2. Carr BG

   . Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for COVID-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1679–81.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Patel SY,
   2. Mehrotra A,
   3. Huskamp HA,
   4. Uscher-Pines L,
   5. Ganguli I,
   6. Barnett ML

   . Variation in telemedicine use and outpatient care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood) 2021;40:349–58.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   1. Spelman JF,
   2. Brienza R,
   3. Walsh RF,
   4. et al

   . A model for rapid transition to virtual care, VA Connecticut primary care response to COVID-19. J Gen Intern Med 2020;35:3073–6.

   OpenUrl
4. 4.↵
   1. Almathami HKY,
   2. Win KT,
   3. Vlahu-Gjorgievska E

   . Barriers and facilitators that influence telemedicine-based, real-time, online consultation at patients' homes: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e16407.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Bradford NK,
   2. Caffery LJ,
   3. Smith AC

   . Telehealth services in rural and remote Australia: a systematic review of models of care and factors influencing success and sustainability. Rural Remote Health 2016;16:3808.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Ratanjee-Vanmali H,
   2. Swanepoel W,
   3. Laplante-Levesque A

   . Patient uptake, experience, and satisfaction using web-based and face-to-face hearing health services: Process evaluation study. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e15875.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Powell RE,
   2. Henstenburg JM,
   3. Cooper G,
   4. Hollander JE,
   5. Rising KL

   . Patient perceptions of telehealth primary care video visits. Ann Fam Med 2017;15:225–9.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Gomez T,
   2. Anaya YB,
   3. Shih KJ,
   4. Tarn DM

   . A qualitative study of primary care physicians' experiences with telemedicine during COVID-19. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:S61–s70.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Shigekawa E,
   2. Fix M,
   3. Corbett G,
   4. Roby DH,
   5. Coffman J

   . The current state of telehealth evidence: a rapid review. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018;37:1975–82.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Ashwood JS,
    2. Mehrotra A,
    3. Cowling D,
    4. Uscher-Pines L

    . Direct-to-consumer telehealth may increase access to care but does not decrease spending. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017;36:485–91.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Licurse AM,
    2. Mehrotra A

    . The effect of telehealth on spending: thinking through the numbers. Ann Intern Med 2018;168:737–8.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Llorian ER,
    2. Mason G

    . Healthcare utilization and telemedicine: An evaluation using linked administrative data from Manitoba. J Telemed Telecare 2021. doi:10.1177/1357633X20981227
13. 13.↵
    1. van Berkel C,
    2. Almond P,
    3. Hughes C,
    4. Smith M,
    5. Horsfield D,
    6. Duckworth H

    . Retrospective observational study of the impact on emergency admission of telehealth at scale delivered in community care in Liverpool, UK. BMJ Open 2019;9:e028981.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. McLean S,
    2. Sheikh A,
    3. Cresswell K,
    4. et al.

    ,. The impact of telehealthcare on the quality and safety of care: a systematic overview. PLoS One 2013;8:e71238.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Kruse CS,
    2. Krowski N,
    3. Rodriguez B,
    4. Tran L,
    5. Vela J,
    6. Brooks M

    . Telehealth and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open 2017;7:e016242

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Ross J,
    2. Stevenson F,
    3. Lau R,
    4. Murray E

    . Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update). Implement Sci 2016;11:146.

    OpenUrlPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Shrank WH,
    2. Keyser D

    . Diffusion of innovations in health care—obtaining evidence to move faster, Health Affairs Blog, May 16, 2017.
18. 18.↵
    1. Marzorati C,
    2. Pravettoni G

    . Value as the key concept in the health care system: how it has influenced medical practice and clinical decision-making processes. J Multidiscip Healthc 2017;10:101–6.

    OpenUrlPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Brook RH,
    2. Chassin MR,
    3. Fink A,
    4. Solomon DH,
    5. Kosecoff J,
    6. Park RE

    . A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1986;2:53–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Varpio L,
    2. Paradis E,
    3. Uijtdehaage S,
    4. Young M

    . The distinctions between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. Acad Med 2020;95:989–94.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. van Dyk L

    . A review of telehealth service implementation frameworks. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014;11:1279–98.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Orlando JF,
    2. Beard M,
    3. Kumar S

    . Systematic review of patient and caregivers' satisfaction with telehealth videoconferencing as a mode of service delivery in managing patients' health. PLoS One 2019;14:e0221848.

    OpenUrlPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Carrasqueiro SA,
    2. Ana Esteves A,
    3. Carla Pereira C,
    4. Martins D,
    5. Lilia Marques L

    . [Internet]. EU state of play on telemedicine services and uptake recommendations. Europa; 2017 [cited 10 April 2022]. Available from: https://www.drgalen.org/international_guidelines_europe.pdf.
24. 24.↵
    1. Raposo VL

    . Telemedicine: The legal framework (or the lack of it) in Europe. GMS Health Technol Assess 2016;12:27579146.

    OpenUrl
25. 25.↵
    1. Broderick A

    . The Veterans Health Administration: taking home telehealth services to scale nationally. 2013 In: Case Studies in Telehealth Adoption. The Commonwealth Fund. Pub. 1657 Vol. 4.
26. 26.↵
    1. Totten AM,
    2. McDonagh MS,
    3. Wagner JH

    [Internet]. The evidence base for telehealth: Reassurance in the face of rapid expansion during the COVID-19 pandemic: a white paper commentary on an AHRQ evidence report. AHRQ; 2020 [cited 10 April 2022]. Available from: https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/telehealth-commentary-white-paper.pdf.
27. 27.↵
    1. Daniel H,
    2. Sulmasy LS

    . Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians. Policy recommendations to guide the use of telemedicine in primary care settings: an American College of Physicians position paper. Ann Intern Med 2015;163:787–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Haimi M,
    2. Brammli-Greenberg S,
    3. Baron-Epel O,
    4. Waisman Y

    . Assessing patient safety in a pediatric telemedicine setting: a multi-methods study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2020;20:63.

    OpenUrl
29. 29.↵
    1. Bashshur RL,
    2. Howell JD,
    3. Krupinski EA,
    4. Harms KM,
    5. Bashshur N,
    6. Doarn CR

    . The empirical foundations of telemedicine interventions in primary care. Telemed J E Health 2016;22:342–75.

    OpenUrlPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Hertzog R,
    2. Johnson J,
    3. Smith J,
    4. et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy in primary care e-visits: evaluation of a large integrated health care delivery system's experience. Mayo Clin Proc 2019; 94:976–84.

    OpenUrlPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Hammersley V,
    2. Donaghy E,
    3. Parker R,
    4. et al

    . Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: A non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2019;69:E595–E604.

    OpenUrl