Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Patient Perceptions of Video Visits in a Fee-for-Service Model

Sirisha Mohan, Wilson Lin, Francis Reyes Orozco, Jehni Robinson and Anjali Mahoney
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2022, 35 (3) 497-506; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.210459
Sirisha Mohan
From Department of Family Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (SM, JR, AM); Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (WL); Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (FRO).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wilson Lin
From Department of Family Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (SM, JR, AM); Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (WL); Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (FRO).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francis Reyes Orozco
From Department of Family Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (SM, JR, AM); Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (WL); Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (FRO).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jehni Robinson
From Department of Family Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (SM, JR, AM); Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (WL); Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (FRO).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anjali Mahoney
From Department of Family Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (SM, JR, AM); Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (WL); Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (FRO).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Barnett ML,
    2. Ray KN,
    3. Souza J,
    4. et al
    . Trends in telemedicine use in a large commercially insured population, 2005-2017. JAMA 2018;320:2147.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Peden CJ,
    2. Mohan S,
    3. Pagán V
    . Telemedicine and COVID-19: an observational study of rapid scale up in a US academic medical system. J Gen Intern Med 2020;35:2823.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Artandi M,
    2. Thomas S,
    3. Shah NR,
    4. et al.
    [Internet]. Rapid system transformation to more than 75% primary care video visits within three weeks at Stanford: response to public safety crisis during a pandemic. N Engl J Med Catal; 2020. Available from: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.20.0100.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Mehrotra A,
    2. Ray K,
    3. Brockmeyer DM,
    4. et al.
    [Internet]. Rapidly converting to “virtual practices”: outpatient care in the era of Covid-19. N Engl J Med Catal; 2020. Available from: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.20.0091.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wosik J,
    2. Fudim M,
    3. Cameron B,
    4. et al
    . Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020;27:957–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act., H.R. 748 (2020).
  7. 7.↵
    1. Thelen-Perry S,
    2. Ved R,
    3. Ellimoottil C
    . Evaluating the patient experience with urological video visits at an academic medical center. Mhealth 2018;4:54.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Donelan K,
    2. Barreto EA,
    3. Sossong S,
    4. et al
    . Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care. Am J Manag Care 2019;25:40–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Izquierdo RE,
    2. Knudson PE,
    3. Meyer S,
    4. et al
    . A comparison of diabetes education administered through telemedicine versus in person. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1002–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Powell RE,
    2. Stone D,
    3. Hollander JE
    . Patient and health system experience with implementation of an enterprise-wide telehealth scheduled video visit program: mixed-methods study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;6:e10.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Parsonson AO,
    2. Grimison P,
    3. Boyer M,
    4. et al.
    [Internet]. Patient satisfaction with telehealth consultations in medical oncology clinics: a cross-sectional study at a metropolitan centre during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Telemed Telecare; 2021. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1357633X211045586.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Odeh B,
    2. Kayyali R,
    3. Nabhani-Gebara S,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of a telehealth service for COPD and HF patients: clinical outcome and patients' perceptions. J Telemed Telecare 2015;21:292–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Powell RE,
    2. Henstenburg JM,
    3. Cooper G,
    4. et al
    . Patient perceptions of telehealth primary care video visits. Ann Fam Med 2017;15:225–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Donaghy E,
    2. Atherton H,
    3. Hammersley V,
    4. et al
    . Acceptability, benefits, and challenges of video consulting: a qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2019;69:e586–e594.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Mueller M,
    2. Knop M,
    3. Niehaves B,
    4. et al
    . Investigating the acceptance of video consultation by patients in rural primary care: empirical comparison of preusers and actual users. JMIR Med Inform 2020;8:e20813.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Polinski JM,
    2. Barker T,
    3. Gagliano N,
    4. et al
    . Patients' satisfaction with and preference for telehealth visits. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31:269–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Gomez T,
    2. Anaya YB,
    3. Shih KJ,
    4. et al
    . A qualitative study of primary care physicians' experiences with telemedicine during COVID-19. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:S61–S70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Samples LS,
    2. Martinez J,
    3. Beru YN,
    4. et al
    . Provider perceptions of telemedicine video visits to home in a veteran population. Telemed e-Health 2021;27:422–6.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Thiyagarajan A,
    2. Grant C,
    3. Griffiths F,
    4. et al
    . Exploring patients' and clinicians' experiences of video consultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review. BJGP Open 2020;4:bjgpopen20X101020.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Scott DR,
    2. Batal HA,
    3. Majeres S,
    4. et al
    . Access and care issues in urban urgent care clinic patients. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:222.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kiil A,
    2. Houlberg K
    . How does copayment for health care services affect demand, health and redistribution? A systematic review of the empirical evidence from 1990 to 2011. Eur J Heal Econ 2014;15:813–28.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Baum Z,
    2. Simmons MR,
    3. Guardiola JH,
    4. et al
    . Potential impact of co-payment at point of care to influence emergency department utilization. PeerJ 2016;4:e1544.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    National Quality Forum [Internet]. Creating a framework to support measure development for telehealth; 2017. Available from: http://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2017/08/Creating_a_Framework_to_Support_Measure_Development_for_Telehealth.aspx.
  24. 24.↵
    NBER [Internet]. Zip Code Distance Database—ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) Distance Database; 2017. Available from: http://data.nber.org/data/zip-code-distance-database.html.
  25. 25.↵
    1. Martinez KA,
    2. Rood M,
    3. Jhangiani N,
    4. et al
    . Patterns of use and correlates of patient satisfaction with a large nationwide direct to consumer telemedicine service. J Gen Intern Med 2018;33:1768–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Lawrence K,
    2. Hanley K,
    3. Adams J,
    4. et al
    . Building telemedicine capacity for trainees during the novel coronavirus outbreak: a case study and lessons learned. J Gen Intern Med 2020;35:2675–9.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Welch BM,
    2. Harvey J,
    3. O'Connell NS,
    4. et al
    . Patient preferences for direct-to-consumer telemedicine services: a nationwide survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17:784.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 35 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 35, Issue 3
May/June 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient Perceptions of Video Visits in a Fee-for-Service Model
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Patient Perceptions of Video Visits in a Fee-for-Service Model
Sirisha Mohan, Wilson Lin, Francis Reyes Orozco, Jehni Robinson, Anjali Mahoney
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2022, 35 (3) 497-506; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.210459

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patient Perceptions of Video Visits in a Fee-for-Service Model
Sirisha Mohan, Wilson Lin, Francis Reyes Orozco, Jehni Robinson, Anjali Mahoney
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2022, 35 (3) 497-506; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.210459
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The "Telehealth Divide"--Who Are the Underserved, and What Care Is Improved?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Academic Medical Centers
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Family Medicine
  • Fee-for-Service Plans
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Primary Health Care
  • Telemedicine

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire