Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

All in the Family: A Qualitative Study of the Early Experiences of Adults with Younger Onset Type 2 Diabetes

Anjali Gopalan, Maruta A. Blatchins, Karen K. Xu, Andrea Altschuler, Cassondra J. Marshall, Danielle M. Hessler, Alicia Fernandez and Richard W. Grant
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2022, 35 (2) 341-351; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.02.210223
Anjali Gopalan
From the Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA (AG, MAB, KKX, AA, and RWG); University of California, Berkeley, Division of Community Health Science, Berkeley, CA (CJM); University of California San Francisco (DMH and AF).
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maruta A. Blatchins
From the Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA (AG, MAB, KKX, AA, and RWG); University of California, Berkeley, Division of Community Health Science, Berkeley, CA (CJM); University of California San Francisco (DMH and AF).
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen K. Xu
From the Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA (AG, MAB, KKX, AA, and RWG); University of California, Berkeley, Division of Community Health Science, Berkeley, CA (CJM); University of California San Francisco (DMH and AF).
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Altschuler
From the Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA (AG, MAB, KKX, AA, and RWG); University of California, Berkeley, Division of Community Health Science, Berkeley, CA (CJM); University of California San Francisco (DMH and AF).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cassondra J. Marshall
From the Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA (AG, MAB, KKX, AA, and RWG); University of California, Berkeley, Division of Community Health Science, Berkeley, CA (CJM); University of California San Francisco (DMH and AF).
DrPH, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danielle M. Hessler
From the Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA (AG, MAB, KKX, AA, and RWG); University of California, Berkeley, Division of Community Health Science, Berkeley, CA (CJM); University of California San Francisco (DMH and AF).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alicia Fernandez
From the Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA (AG, MAB, KKX, AA, and RWG); University of California, Berkeley, Division of Community Health Science, Berkeley, CA (CJM); University of California San Francisco (DMH and AF).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard W. Grant
From the Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA (AG, MAB, KKX, AA, and RWG); University of California, Berkeley, Division of Community Health Science, Berkeley, CA (CJM); University of California San Francisco (DMH and AF).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. United States Diabetes Surveillance System. Available from: https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/diabetes/DiabetesAtlas.html#.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Wilmot E,
    2. Idris I
    . Early onset type 2 diabetes: risk factors, clinical impact and management. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2014;5:234–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Nanayakkara N,
    2. Curtis AJ,
    3. Heritier S,
    4. et al
    . Impact of age at type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis on mortality and vascular complications: systematic review and meta-analyses. Diabetologia 2021;64:275–87.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Gopalan A,
    2. Mishra P,
    3. Alexeeff SE,
    4. et al
    . Initial glycemic control and care among younger adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2020;43:975–81.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kazemian P,
    2. Shebl FM,
    3. McCann N,
    4. Walensky RP,
    5. Wexler DJ
    . Evaluation of the cascade of diabetes care in the United States, 2005–2016. JAMA Intern Med 2019;179:1376.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wang L,
    2. Li X,
    3. Wang Z,
    4. et al
    . Trends in prevalence of diabetes and control of risk factors in diabetes among US adults, 1999–2018. JAMA 2021;326:704.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Holman RR,
    2. Paul SK,
    3. Bethel MA,
    4. Matthews DR,
    5. Neil HA
    . 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1577–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Laiteerapong N,
    2. Ham SA,
    3. Gao Y,
    4. et al
    . The legacy effect in type 2 diabetes: impact of early glycemic control on future complications (The Diabetes & Aging Study). Diabetes Care 2019;42:416–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bo A,
    2. Thomsen RW,
    3. Nielsen JS,
    4. et al
    . Early-onset type 2 diabetes: Age gradient in clinical and behavioural risk factors in 5115 persons with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes-Results from the DD2 study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2018;34:e2968.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Zhao W,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Lin M,
    4. Sigal RJ
    . Association between diabetes and depression: Sex and age differences. Public Health 2006;120:696–704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Hessler DM,
    2. Fisher L,
    3. Mullan JT,
    4. Glasgow RE,
    5. Masharani U
    . Patient age: a neglected factor when considering disease management in adults with type 2 diabetes. Patient Educ Couns 2011;85:154–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Lally M,
    2. Valentine-French S
    . Lifespan Development: A Psychological Perspective: College of Lake County; 2019. Available from: http://dept.clcillinois.edu/psy/LifespanDevelopment.pdf.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ramchandani N,
    2. Way N,
    3. Melkus GD,
    4. Sullivan-Bolyai S
    . Challenges to diabetes self-management in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2019;45:484–97.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Markowitz B,
    2. Pritlove C,
    3. Mukerji G,
    4. Lavery JV,
    5. Parsons JA,
    6. Advani A
    . The 3i conceptual framework for recognizing patient perspectives of type 1 diabetes during emerging adulthood. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e196944.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. O'Hara MC,
    2. Hynes L,
    3. O'Donnell M
    , Irish Type 1 Diabetes Young Adult Study Groupet al. A systematic review of interventions to improve outcomes for young adults with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 2017;34:753–69.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Michie S,
    2. van Stralen MM,
    3. West R
    . The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 2011;6:42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Handley MA,
    2. Harleman E,
    3. Gonzalez-Mendez E,
    4. et al
    . Applying the COM-B model to creation of an IT-enabled health coaching and resource linkage program for low-income Latina moms with recent gestational diabetes: the STAR MAMA program. Implement Sci 2016;11:73.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Alexander KE,
    2. Brijnath B,
    3. Mazza D
    . Barriers and enablers to delivery of the Healthy Kids Check: an analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model. Implement Sci 2014;9:60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Guest G,
    2. Namey E,
    3. McKenna K
    . How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods 2017;29:3–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Coenen M,
    2. Stamm TA,
    3. Stucki G,
    4. Cieza A
    . Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of two qualitative methods. Qual Life Res 2012;21:359–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Guest G,
    2. Namey E,
    3. Taylor J,
    4. Eley N,
    5. McKenna K
    . Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from a randomized study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2017;20:693–708.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Haw JS,
    2. Shah M,
    3. Turbow S,
    4. Egeolu M,
    5. Umpierrez G
    . Diabetes complications in racial and ethnic minority populations in the USA. Curr Diab Rep 2021;21:2.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Stull DE,
    2. Leidy NK,
    3. Parasuraman B,
    4. Chassany O
    . Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: challenges and potential solutions. Curr Med Res Opin 2009;25:929–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Robinson N,
    2. Fuller JH
    . Role of life events and difficulties in the onset of diabetes mellitus. J Psychosom Res 1985;29:583–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Rankin NM,
    2. York S,
    3. Stone E,
    4. et al
    . Pathways to lung cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of patients and general practitioners about diagnostic and pretreatment intervals. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017;14:742–53.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Penn L,
    2. Moffatt SM,
    3. White M
    . Participants' perspective on maintaining behaviour change: a qualitative study within the European Diabetes Prevention Study. BMC Public Health 2008;8:235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Schroeder EB,
    2. Donahoo WT,
    3. Goodrich GK,
    4. Raebel MA
    . Validation of an algorithm for identifying type 1 diabetes in adults based on electronic health record data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2018;27:1053–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Klompas M,
    2. Eggleston E,
    3. McVetta J,
    4. Lazarus R,
    5. Li L,
    6. Platt R
    . Automated detection and classification of type 1 versus type 2 diabetes using electronic health record data. Diabetes care 2013;36:914–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Leask J,
    2. Hawe P,
    3. Chapman S
    . Focus group composition: a comparison between natural and constructed groups. Aust N Z J Public Health 2001;25:152–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Greenwood N,
    2. Ellmers T,
    3. Holley J
    . The influence of ethnic group composition on focus group discussions. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14:107.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Patton MQ
    . Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 1999;34:1189–208.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Braun V,
    2. Clarke V
    . Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006;3:77–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    1. Adu MD,
    2. Malabu UH,
    3. Malau-Aduli AEO,
    4. Malau-Aduli BS
    . Enablers and barriers to effective diabetes self-management: A multi-national investigation. PLoS One 2019;14:e0217771.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Ahola AJ,
    2. Groop PH
    . Barriers to self-management of diabetes. Diabet Med 2013;30:413–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Breland JY,
    2. McAndrew LM,
    3. Gross RL,
    4. Leventhal H,
    5. Horowitz CR
    . Challenges to healthy eating for people with diabetes in a low-income, minority neighborhood. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2895–901.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Shultz JA,
    2. Sprague MA,
    3. Branen LJ,
    4. Lambeth S
    . A comparison of views of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetes educators about barriers to diet and exercise. J Health Commun 2001;6:99–115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Maillet NA,
    2. D'Eramo Melkus G,
    3. Spollett G
    . Using focus groups to characterize the health beliefs and practices of black women with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabetes Educ 1996;22:39–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Chlebowy DO,
    2. Hood S,
    3. LaJoie AS
    . Facilitators and barriers to self-management of type 2 diabetes among urban African American adults: focus group findings. Diabetes Educ 2010;36:897–905.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Tannenbaum MB,
    2. Hepler J,
    3. Zimmerman RS,
    4. et al
    . Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychol Bull 2015;141:1178–204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Asuzu CC,
    2. Walker RJ,
    3. Williams JS,
    4. Egede LE
    . Pathways for the relationship between diabetes distress, depression, fatalism and glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 2017;31:169–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Laroche HH,
    2. Davis MM,
    3. Forman J,
    4. et al
    . Children's roles in parents' diabetes self-management. Am J Prev Med 2009;37:S251–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    1. Krall J,
    2. Helgeson VS,
    3. Tracy EL,
    4. Campbell MS,
    5. Korytkowski M,
    6. Berg CA
    . Perspectives of parents with type 1 diabetes: role of children in self-management and support. Diabetes Educ 2020;46:552–8.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Fisher L,
    2. Mullan JT,
    3. Arean P,
    4. Glasgow RE,
    5. Hessler D,
    6. Masharani U
    . Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Diabetes care 2010;33:23–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Gopalan A,
    2. Blatchins MA,
    3. Altschuler A,
    4. Mishra P,
    5. Fakhouri I,
    6. Grant RW
    . Disclosure of new type 2 diabetes diagnoses to younger adults: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med 2021;36:1622–8.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    1. Flores-Luevano S,
    2. Pacheco M,
    3. Shokar GS,
    4. Dwivedi AK,
    5. Shokar NK
    . Impact of a culturally tailored diabetes education and empowerment program in a Mexican American population along the US/Mexico Border: a pragmatic study. J Clin Med Res 2020;12:517–29.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.↵
    1. Islam NS,
    2. Wyatt LC,
    3. Taher MD,
    4. et al
    . A culturally tailored community health worker intervention leads to improvement in patient-centered outcomes for immigrant patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Diabetes 2018;36:100–11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 35 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 35, Issue 2
March/April 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
All in the Family: A Qualitative Study of the Early Experiences of Adults with Younger Onset Type 2 Diabetes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
All in the Family: A Qualitative Study of the Early Experiences of Adults with Younger Onset Type 2 Diabetes
Anjali Gopalan, Maruta A. Blatchins, Karen K. Xu, Andrea Altschuler, Cassondra J. Marshall, Danielle M. Hessler, Alicia Fernandez, Richard W. Grant
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2022, 35 (2) 341-351; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.02.210223

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
All in the Family: A Qualitative Study of the Early Experiences of Adults with Younger Onset Type 2 Diabetes
Anjali Gopalan, Maruta A. Blatchins, Karen K. Xu, Andrea Altschuler, Cassondra J. Marshall, Danielle M. Hessler, Alicia Fernandez, Richard W. Grant
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2022, 35 (2) 341-351; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.02.210223
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • This Issue's Emphasis: Inequity and COVID-19, Intertwined
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
  • Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Age of Onset
  • Focus Groups
  • Motivation
  • Parenting
  • Qualitative Research
  • Self-Management
  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire