Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Oncology and Primary Care Provider Views on Cancer Survivorship Care: Mind the Gap

Mark P. Doescher, Zsolt Nagykaldi, Yan Daniel Zhao and Kathleen Dwyer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2022, 35 (2) 329-340; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.02.210286
Mark P. Doescher
From Stephenson Cancer Center, College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (MPD); College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (ZN); Stephenson Cancer Center, Hudson College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (YDZ); Fran and Earl Ziegler College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (KD).
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zsolt Nagykaldi
From Stephenson Cancer Center, College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (MPD); College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (ZN); Stephenson Cancer Center, Hudson College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (YDZ); Fran and Earl Ziegler College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (KD).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yan Daniel Zhao
From Stephenson Cancer Center, College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (MPD); College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (ZN); Stephenson Cancer Center, Hudson College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (YDZ); Fran and Earl Ziegler College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (KD).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen Dwyer
From Stephenson Cancer Center, College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (MPD); College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (ZN); Stephenson Cancer Center, Hudson College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (YDZ); Fran and Earl Ziegler College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (KD).
PhD, RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Preferred Approach to Survivorship Care for Patients with Early-Stage Cancer. Abbreviations: ONCs, oncology care providers; PCPs, primary care providers.

  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Oncology Provider (ONC) and Primary Care Provider (PCP) Characteristics

    Selected CharacteristicsONC (n = 101)PCP (n = 58)p-Value
    Provider Discipline (%)0.29
        Physician73.882.4
        Other Provider type (ARNP, PA, or RN)26.217.6
    Years in practice (%)0.03
        <1024.712
        10 to 1918.240
        20 to 2927.318
        30 or more29.930
    Practice location (%)0.05
        Urban65.945.1
        Suburban18.323.5
        Rural15.931.4
    Number of patients seen per week0.03
        25 or fewer30.011.8
        26 to 5023.821.6
        51 to 7523.819.6
        76 to 10015.023.5
        101 or more-7.423.5
    Practice size
        Solo practice13.47.80.21
            2 to 5 clinicians28.131.4
            5 to 10 clinicians23.211.8
            >10 clinicians35.349.0
        Practice has electronic billing system (% yes)57.453.70.66
        Practice has electronic health record (% yes)67.857.30.14
        Practice has secure messaging (% yes)47.847.61.0
        Practice has patient registry/tracking available (% yes)35.726.80.22
    Practice Referral Processes (%)
        No specific system (handled case-by-case)43.621.60.06
        Protocols and tracking system10.213.7
        Comprehensive, health system-wide referral system15.415.7
        All of the above + dedicated personnel30.849.0
    Practice care coordination processes (%)
        No specific system (handled case-by-case)28.635.30.04
        Organized communication approach (e.g., messaging)24.737.3
        Communication approach and dedicated personnel27.37.8
        Comprehensive, health system-wide care coordination19.419.6
    Perceived organizational/practice change capacity (%)
        Practice has not tried to implement changes or improvements in care processes3.700.32
        It has been very difficult to implement changes7.411.8
        It has been challenging, but possible to implement changes24.735.3
        Several changes/improvements have been implemented successfully37.025.5
        The organization welcomes change and has a process to implement care improvements27.227.5
    • Abbreviations: ARNP, advanced registered nurse practitioner; PA, physician assistant; RN, registered nurses.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Provision of Cancer Care Coordination Services by Oncology Providers (ONCs) and Primary Care Providers (PCPs)

    ONCPCPp-Value
    How often do you routinely communicate with patient's other provider(s) about which provider(s) will…
        …follow the patient for cancer? (%)<0.001
         Never6.110.9
            Rarely3.741.8
            Sometimes17.120.0
            Often36.618.2
            Always/Almost Always36.69.1
        …handle patient's other medical issues? (%)0.028
            Never7.212.7
            Rarely15.729.1
            Sometimes27.732.7
            Often26.518.2
            Always/Almost Always22.97.3
    How often do you…
        … send (ONC)/receive (PCP) a comprehensive summary including detailed cancer treatment information from the ONC? (%)
            Never4.910.5<0.001
            Rarely6.128.9
            Sometimes23.226.3
            Often23.228.9
            Always/Almost Always35.45.3
            N/A7.30.0
        …provide (ONC)/receive (PCP) information from the oncologist in a timely manner? (%)
            Never1.27.9<0.001
            Rarely1.218.4
            Sometimes13.634.2
            Often32.134.2
            Always/Almost Always46.97.9
            N/A4.90.0
        …experience difficulties transferring patient care responsibilities between you and the PCP/ONC? (%)
            Never3.72.00.603
            Rarely21.022.0
            Sometimes42.032.0
            Often18.524.0
            Always/Almost Always9.918.0
            N/A4.92.0
        …assist patients with recurrent cancer in making decisions about whether and how their cancer should be treated? (%)
            Never2.48.0<0.001
            Rarely4.920.0
            Sometimes6.138.0
            Often29.328.0
            Always/Almost Always54.96.0
            N/A2.40.0
        …have a specific discussion with the patient regarding recommendations for future care and surveillance? (%)
            Never1.26.0<0.001
            Rarely1.226.0
            Sometimes7.428.0
            Often21.034.0
            Always/Almost Always64.26.0
            N/A4.90
        …clearly understand the division of care responsibilities between you and the ONC/PCP team? (%)
            Never1.216.2<0.001
            Rarely8.627.0
            Sometimes28.437.8
            Often28.416.2
            Always/Almost Always32.12.7
            N/A1.20
        …provide (ONCs)/receive (PCPs) information that cancer has recurred? (%)
            Never1.38.3<0.001
            Rarely7.522.9
            Sometimes11.331.3
            Often17.531.3
            Always/Almost Always56.36.3
            N/A6.30
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Confidence and Perceived Skill in the Provision of Cancer Survivorship Care by Oncology Providers (ONCs) and Primary Care Providers (PCPs)

    ONCPCPp-Value
    Amount of confidence in knowledge of cancer-related follow-up care for survivors:
        Order appropriate surveillance testing to detect recurrent cancer (%)
            Not at all confident1.225.5<0.001
            Somewhat confident20.949.1
            Very confident77.923.6
            Don't know0.01.8
        Detect long-term and late physical adverse effects of cancer and cancer treatment (%)
            Not at all confident2.325.5<0.001
            Somewhat confident30.258.2
            Very confident67.416.4
            Don't know0.00.0
        Address adverse psychosocial outcomes of cancer or its treatment (%)
            Not at all confident2.312.70.052
            Somewhat confident50.043.6
            Very confident47.743.6
            Don't know0.00.0
    To what extent do you agree/disagree with statements regarding patients who have completed active cancer treatment?
        PCPs have the skills needed to provide follow‐up care related to the effects of cancer or its treatment for survivors (%)
            Strongly disagree22.62.4<0.001
            Somewhat disagree41.77.3
            Neither Agree nor disagree9.534.1
            Somewhat agree19.034.1
            Strongly agree7.122.0
        PCPs have the skills needed to initiate appropriate screening or diagnostic work‐ up to detect recurrent cancer (%)
            Strongly disagree29.41.9<0.001
            Somewhat disagree40.014.8
            Neither Agree nor disagree7.124.1
            Somewhat agree15.335.2
            Strongly agree8.224.1
        PCPs should have primary responsibility for cancer‐related follow‐up for survivors (%)
            Strongly disagree40.012.50.002
            Somewhat disagree42.437.5
            Neither Agree nor disagree4.717.5
            Somewhat agree10.625.0
            Strongly agree2.47.5
        PCPs are better able than ONCs to provide psychosocial support for survivors (%)
            Strongly disagree36.55.6<0.001
            Somewhat disagree30.69.3
            Neither Agree nor disagree18.824.1
            Somewhat agree10.627.8
            Strongly agree3.533.3
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Oncology Provider (ONC) and Primary Care Provider (PCP) Perceived Role in Cancer Survivorship Care

    ONCPCPp-Value
    For patients who have completed cancer treatment, how often take responsibility for…
        …screening for other new primary cancers (%)
            Never10.82.6<0.001
            Rarely20.50
            Sometimes22.95.1
            Often15.730.8
            Almost/Almost Always22.961.5
            N/A7.20.0
    …evaluating patients for recurrence of cancer (%)
            Never2.42.0<0.001
            Rarely6.07.8
            Sometimes2.431.4
            Often13.345.1
            Almost/Almost Always67.513.7
            N/A8.40.0
    …evaluating patients for adverse psychological effects of cancer or its treatment (%)
            Never6.000.016
            Rarely13.30
            Sometimes27.733.3
            Often24.146.2
            Almost/Almost Always20.517.9
            N/A8.42.6
    …evaluating patients for long-term and late physical adverse effects of cancer and cancer (%)
            Never3.70<0.001
            Rarely6.212.0
            Sometimes12.338.0
            Often32.138.0
            Almost/Almost Always37.012.0
            N/A8.60.0
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 35 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 35, Issue 2
March/April 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Oncology and Primary Care Provider Views on Cancer Survivorship Care: Mind the Gap
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Oncology and Primary Care Provider Views on Cancer Survivorship Care: Mind the Gap
Mark P. Doescher, Zsolt Nagykaldi, Yan Daniel Zhao, Kathleen Dwyer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2022, 35 (2) 329-340; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.02.210286

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Oncology and Primary Care Provider Views on Cancer Survivorship Care: Mind the Gap
Mark P. Doescher, Zsolt Nagykaldi, Yan Daniel Zhao, Kathleen Dwyer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2022, 35 (2) 329-340; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.02.210286
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix 1 - Oncology Survey
    • Appendix 2 - PCP Survey
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • This Issue's Emphasis: Inequity and COVID-19, Intertwined
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Cancer Survivors
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Oklahoma
  • Primary Health Care
  • Quality Improvement
  • Survivorship

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire