Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleEVIDENCE-BASED CLINICAL MEDICINE

Interpreting COVID-19 Test Results in Clinical Settings: It Depends!

Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Kyeong Yun Jeong, Kenneth W. Lin, John Kraemer and Michael A. Stoto
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine February 2021, 34 (Supplement) S233-S243; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.S1.200413
Rachael Piltch-Loeb
From the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Emergency Preparedness Research Evaluation Program, Boston MA (RP-L); Georgetown University School of Medicine (KYJ); Georgetown University Medical Center, Department of Family Medicine (KWL); Georgetown University, Department of Health Systems Administration, Washington DC (JK, MAS).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyeong Yun Jeong
From the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Emergency Preparedness Research Evaluation Program, Boston MA (RP-L); Georgetown University School of Medicine (KYJ); Georgetown University Medical Center, Department of Family Medicine (KWL); Georgetown University, Department of Health Systems Administration, Washington DC (JK, MAS).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth W. Lin
From the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Emergency Preparedness Research Evaluation Program, Boston MA (RP-L); Georgetown University School of Medicine (KYJ); Georgetown University Medical Center, Department of Family Medicine (KWL); Georgetown University, Department of Health Systems Administration, Washington DC (JK, MAS).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Kraemer
From the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Emergency Preparedness Research Evaluation Program, Boston MA (RP-L); Georgetown University School of Medicine (KYJ); Georgetown University Medical Center, Department of Family Medicine (KWL); Georgetown University, Department of Health Systems Administration, Washington DC (JK, MAS).
JD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael A. Stoto
From the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Emergency Preparedness Research Evaluation Program, Boston MA (RP-L); Georgetown University School of Medicine (KYJ); Georgetown University Medical Center, Department of Family Medicine (KWL); Georgetown University, Department of Health Systems Administration, Washington DC (JK, MAS).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Theoretical Explanation of Individual Motivation for Seeking a Test Based on the Health Belief Model8

    ConstructsDefinitionApplication to testing motivation
    Perceived SusceptibilityBelief about the likelihood of getting a disease or conditionPerception of COVID-19 being an issue in the individual’s geographic area
    Perceived severityBelief about the seriousness of contracting a condition or of leaving it untreated, including physical consequences and social consequencesPerception the individual is at risk for COVID-19 given age and other demographics
    Perceived benefitsBeliefs about positive features or advantages of a recommended action to reduce threatPerception that a test provides beneficial information or is a “treatment” unto itself
    Perceived barriersBeliefs about negative features or of a recommended action to reduce threatPerception that test is not useful or painful to get
    Cue to actionInternal or external markers stimulusMedia coverage of testing; knowing others who have been tested; getting sick
    Self-efficacyThe conviction that one can successfully execute a behaviorAbility to go and get a test
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Test Performance in Three Hypothetical Clinical Scenarios*

    Panel a: Scenario 1 – Low Pretest Probability (LFA)
    DxNo DxPPVNPV
    Prevalence 0.1%, Sn 90, Sp 95
    (+)95001.8%99.9%
    (-)19490
    Prevalence 0.2%, Sn 90, Sp 95
    (+)184993.5%100.0%
    (-)29481
    Panel b: Scenario 2 – Intermediate Pretest Probability (RT-PCR Initially Negative)
    DxNo DxPPVNPV
    Prevalence 40%, Sn 85%, Sp 95%
    (+)34391.9%90.5%
    (-)657
    Prevalence 60%, Sn 85%, Sp 95%
    (+)51296.2%80.9%
    (-)938
    Panel c: Scenario 3 – High Pretest Probability (RT-PCR)
    DxNo DxPPVNPV
    Prevalence 80%, Sn 90%, Sp 95%
    (+)72198.6%70.4%
    (-)819
    Prevalence 80%, Sn 80%, Sp 95%
    (+)64198.4%54.3%
    (-)1619
    • LFA, lateral flow assay; RT-PCR, real-time polymerase chain reaction.

    • *These tables describe the distribution of 10,000 (panel a) or 100 patients (panels b and c) with and without the disease (COVID-19) compared to with positive and negative test results.

    • †Sensitivity (Sn), the proportion of infected individuals who test positive.

    • ‡specificity (Sp), the proportion of uninfected individuals who test negative.

    • §Dx, patient has disease; no Dx, patient does not have disease.

    • ||(+), test result is positive; (-), test result is negative.

    • ¶Positive predictive value (PPV), the probability that a positive test result actually means one has COVID-19.

    • ¶¶Negative predictive value (NPV), the probability that a negative test result actually means one does not have COVID-19.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family  Medicine: 34 (Supplement)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 34, Issue Supplement
February 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Interpreting COVID-19 Test Results in Clinical Settings: It Depends!
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Interpreting COVID-19 Test Results in Clinical Settings: It Depends!
Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Kyeong Yun Jeong, Kenneth W. Lin, John Kraemer, Michael A. Stoto
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Feb 2021, 34 (Supplement) S233-S243; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.S1.200413

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Interpreting COVID-19 Test Results in Clinical Settings: It Depends!
Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Kyeong Yun Jeong, Kenneth W. Lin, John Kraemer, Michael A. Stoto
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Feb 2021, 34 (Supplement) S233-S243; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.S1.200413
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • The Who, Why, and How of COVID-19 Testing
    • What Types of Tests Exist?
    • Considerations for Advising Patients
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Primary Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Essential, and Inspiring
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Practical Recommendations for Minimizing Pain and Anxiety with IUD Insertion
  • A Simplified Approach to Evaluate and Manage Shoulder Pain
  • Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms
Show more Evidence-Based Clinical Medicine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Contact Tracing
  • COVID-19
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Population Health
  • Probability
  • Public Health
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire