Research ArticleOriginal Research

Purposeful Incorporation of Patient Narratives in the Medical Record in the Netherlands

Hilde Luijks, Kees van Boven, Tim olde Hartman, Annemarie Uijen, Chris van Weel and Henk Schers
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2021, 34 (4) 709-723; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.04.200609

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Phillips RL Jr..,
    2. Pugno PA,
    3. Saultz JW,
    4. et al
    . Health is primary: family medicine for America's health. Ann Fam Med 2014;12:S1–S12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. McWhinney IR
    . Primary care: core values. Core values in a changing world. BMJ 1998;316:1807–1809.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Huygen FJA
    . Family medicine. The medical life history of families. Nijmegen: Dekker and Van de Vegt; 1978.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Van Weel C
    . Longitudinal research and data collection in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2005;3:S46–S51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Van Weel C
    . The Continuous Morbidity Registration Nijmegen: background and history of a Dutch general practice database. Eur J Gen Pract 2008;14 Suppl 1:5–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    FaMe-Net. FaMe-Net reference list. Published March 1, 2021. Available from: https://www.famenet.nl/. Accessed March 1, 2021.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Uijen AA,
    2. Bor H,
    3. Van Boven K
    . FaMe-Net: twee oude registratienetwerken in een nieuw jasje. Tijdschr Gezondheidswet 2015;93:286–287.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Peterson KA,
    2. Lipman PD,
    3. Lange CJ,
    4. Cohen RA,
    5. Durako S
    . Supporting better science in primary care: a description of practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in 2011. J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:565–571.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lamberts H,
    2. Hofmans-Okkes I
    . Episode of care: a core concept in family practice. J Fam Pract 1996;42:161–167.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Okkes I,
    2. Oskam S,
    3. Lamberts H,
    4. Van Boven K
    . Episodes of care in Dutch Family Practice. Epidemiological data based on the routine use of the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) in the Transition Project. Amsterdam: Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam; 2005.
  11. 11.↵
    1. De Jongh T,
    2. De VH,
    3. Grundmeijer H
    . Diagnostiek van alledaagse klachten. Bouwstenen voor rationeel probleemoplossen. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2004.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Van Boven K,
    2. Uijen AA,
    3. Van de Wiel N,
    4. Oskam SK,
    5. Schers HJ,
    6. Assendelft WJJ
    . The diagnostic value of the patient's reason for encounter for diagnosing cancer in primary care. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:806–812.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Okkes IM,
    2. Oskam SK,
    3. Lamberts H
    . The probability of specific diagnoses for patients presenting with common symptoms to Dutch family physicians. J Fam Pract 2002;51:31–36.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Houwink EJF,
    2. Hortensius OR,
    3. Van Boven K,
    4. Sollie A,
    5. Numans ME
    . Genetics in primary care: validating a tool to pre-symptomatically assess common disease risk using an Australian questionnaire on family history. Clin Transl Med 2019;8:17.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
  16. 16.↵
    Netherlands institute for health services research. 2020. Available from: https://nivel.nl/en. Published March 1, 2021.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Schers H,
    2. van Weel C,
    3. van Boven K,
    4. Akkermans R,
    5. Bischoff E,
    6. Olde Hartman T
    . The COVID-19 Pandemic in Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Changes in presented health problems and demand for primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2021;19:44–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Dijkstra I,
    2. Uijen AA,
    3. Van Boven K,
    4. Schers H
    . CVRM en belaste familieanamnese. Huisarts Wet 2021;64:10–15.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Little P,
    2. Everitt H,
    3. Williamson I,
    4. et al
    . Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ 2001;323:908–911.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Stolper E,
    2. Van de Wiel M,
    3. Van Royen P,
    4. Van Bokhoven M,
    5. Van der Weijden T,
    6. Dinant GJ
    . Gut feelings as a third track in general practitioners' diagnostic reasoning. J Gen Intern Med 2011;26:197–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Olde Hartman TC,
    2. Van Ravesteijn H,
    3. Lucassen P,
    4. Van Boven K,
    5. Van Weel-Baumgarten E,
    6. Van Weel C
    . Why the 'reason for encounter' should be incorporated in the analysis of outcome of care. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:e839–e841.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Van Weel C
    . Primary health care and family medicine at the core of health care: challenges and priorities in how to further strengthen their potential. Front Med (Lausanne) 2014;1:37.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Greenhalgh T
    . Narrative based medicine: narrative based medicine in an evidence based world. BMJ 1999;318:323–325.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Fioretti C,
    2. Mazzocco K,
    3. Riva S,
    4. Oliveri S,
    5. Masiero M,
    6. Pravettoni G
    . Research studies on patients' illness experience using the Narrative Medicine approach: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2016;6:e011220.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Greenhalgh T,
    2. Hurwitz B
    . Narrative based medicine: why study narrative? BMJ 1999;318:48–50.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Van de Lisdonk EH,
    2. Van den Bosch WJHM,
    3. Lagro-Janssen ALM,
    4. Schers HJ
    . Ziekten in de huisartspraktijk. Maarssen: Elsevier gezondheidszorg; 2008.
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kyrimi E,
    2. Mossadegh S,
    3. Tai N,
    4. Marsh W
    . An incremental explanation of inference in Bayesian networks for increasing model trustworthiness and supporting clinical decision making. Artif Intell Med 2020;103:101812.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Moons KG,
    2. Altman DG,
    3. Vergouwe Y,
    4. Royston P
    . Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice. BMJ 2009;338:b606.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Wyatt JC,
    2. Altman DG
    . Commentary. Prognostic models: clinically useful or quickly forgotten? BMJ 1995;311:1539–1541.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hickner J,
    2. Green LA
    . Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) in the United States: growing and still going after all these years. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:541–545.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Keywords