Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Specialty Differences in Initial Evaluation of Patients With Non-Acute Musculoskeletal Pain

Lisa C. Carlesso, Debbie Ehrmann Feldman and Richard L. Nahin
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2021, 34 (3) 618-633; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200286
Lisa C. Carlesso
From the School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada, School of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Program Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada (LCC); School of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Program and School of Public Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, Institute of Public Health Research, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada (DEF); National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (RLN).
PT, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debbie Ehrmann Feldman
From the School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada, School of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Program Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada (LCC); School of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Program and School of Public Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, Institute of Public Health Research, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada (DEF); National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (RLN).
PT, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard L. Nahin
From the School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada, School of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Program Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada (LCC); School of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Program and School of Public Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, Institute of Public Health Research, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada (DEF); National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (RLN).
MPH, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Description of the Sample for Initial Medical Encounter for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

    CharacteristicWeighted FrequencyProportion
    Patient characteristicsAge category:
        <2432423,4499.8
        25 to 4473083,71822.1
        45 to 64130756,57139.5
        65 to 7450940,31615.4
        ≥7543619,91313.2
    Female197197,65759.6
    Male133626,40840.4
    Race/ethnicity:
        White235032,75871.0
        Black34957,02810.6
        Hispanic41253,28012.5
        Other19580,9995.9
    Smoking:
        Not currently202897,16582.3
        Currently43635,22317.7
    Payment source:
        Self-pay11658,6393.7
        Private insurance178058,21656.0
        Medicare84959,93026.7
        Medicaid/CHIP26321,4888.3
        Workers' comp9294,4552.9
        Other*7291,2292.3
    Physician and practice characteristicsSpecialty:
        Family physician118232,86935.7
        Pediatrician11321,0663.4
        Internal medicine68549,86720.7
        Orthopedist73700,33622.3
        Neurologist5785,2811.8
        Other53234,64616.1
    Physician degree:
        MD296458,72689.6
        DO34365,33910.4
    Type of practice:
        Solo104086,38731.5
        Nonsolo (group)226710,08568.5
    Office type:
        Private practice296241,08989.6
        All other†34582,97610.4
    EMR:
        Yes, all195712,41759.3
        Yes, part38619,68011.7
        No95852,84529.0
    Survey year200733040,56310.0
    200831277,4389.4
    200933262,63610.0
    201037958,50411.5
    201133019,68710.0
    201235868,62410.8
    201335906,75910.8
    201438721,71111.7
    201551768,14315.6
    • ↵* Source of payment other: charity, unknown, other.

    • ↵† Office type—all other: office setting all other; free-standing clinics/urgicenter; federally qualified health center; mental health center; non–federal government clinic; family planning clinic; health maintenance organization or other prepaid practice; faculty practice plan.

    • CHIP, Children's Health Insurance Program; EMR, electronic medical record.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Factors Associated With Depression Screening, Any Imaging Tests, and Complete Blood Count Tests at Initial Medical Encounter

    Depression Screening OR (95% CI)Any Imaging OR (95% CI)CBC OR (95% CI)
    Patient age (years):
        ≤24ReferenceReferenceReference
        25 to 442.05 (0.37, 11.33)0.85 (0.68, 1.05)2.01 (1.21, 3.35)
        45 to 642.04 (0.36, 11.47)0.98 (0.80, 1.20)2.86 (1.70, 4.80)
        ≥652.19 (0.37, 12.95)1.06 (0.84, 1.33)2.95 (1.75, 4.98)
    Patient sex:
        MaleReferenceReferenceReference
        Female1.12 (0.69, 1.83)1.16 (1.01, 1.33)1.27 (0.98, 1.64)
    Race/ethnicity:
        Non-Hispanic WhiteReferenceReferenceReference
        Non-Hispanic Black2.42 (1.03, 5.69)0.90 (0.72, 1.12)1.12 (0.78, 1.61)
        Hispanic2.79 (1.24, 6.25)0.84 (0.67, 1.06)1.47 (1.00, 2.17)
        Non-Hispanic other2.96 (1.06, 8.25)1.30 (0.94, 1.81)0.53 (0.27, 1.04)
    Smoking status:
        No tobacco useReferenceReferenceReference
        Current tobacco use1.93 (0.82, 4.56)0.93 (0.78, 1.11)1.14 (0.83, 1.56)
    Source of payment:
        Self-pay0.69 (0.21, 2.27)0.68 (0.41, 1.14)0.71 (0.34, 1.49)
        Private insuranceReferenceReferenceReference
        Any public health insurance2.26 (1.20, 4.28)1.03 (0.88, 1.20)1.14 (0.86, 1.50)
        Workers' comp1.16 (0.22, 6.09)1.06 (0.74, 1.51)0.24 (0.08, 0.78)
        Other*2.74 (0.88, 8.52)0.95 (0.62, 1.46)1.09 (0.55, 2.15)
    No. of past visits†
        New patient0.94 (0.45, 1.99)1.67 (1.35, 2.06)1.47 (1.00, 2.16)
        0 previous visits0.82 (0.27, 2.54)1.63 (1.26, 2.13)0.89 (0.55, 1.45)
        1 previous visitReferenceReferenceReference
        2 to 3 previous visits1.09 (0.51, 2.36)0.93 (0.77, 1.12)0.81 (0.58, 1.13)
        ≥4 previous visits1.27 (0.64, 2.48)0.83 (0.68, 1.02)0.72 (0.50, 1.03)
    Physician specialty:
        Family practiceReferenceReferenceReference
        Internal medicine0.92 (0.50, 1.70)1.08 (0.89, 1.32)1.34 (0.98, 1.84)
        Pediatrics1.17 (0.10, 13.11)1.23 (0.85, 1.79)1.67 (0.84, 3.33)
        Orthopedic surgery0.14 (0.04, 0.44)2.77 (2.25, 3.42)0.07 (0.04, 0.13)
        Neurology0.66 (0.16, 2.68)0.81 (0.59, 1.13)0.31 (0.17, 0.57)
        Oncology1.91 (0.19, 19.08)1.97 (0.66, 5.86)4.00 (1.34, 11.93)
        Others0.26 (0.09, 0.73)0.94 (0.75, 1.19)0.69 (0.42, 1.13)
    Degree:
        MDReferenceReferenceReference
        DO0.41 (0.19, 0.88)0.84 (0.70, 1.02)0.85 (0.63, 1.14)
    Practice type:
        SoloReferenceReferenceReference
        Nonsolo/group1.54 (0.85, 2.78)1.27 (1.08, 1.48)0.97 (0.72, 1.30)
    EMR:
        All electronic1.89 (0.66, 5.45)1.06 (0.87, 1.28)0.83 (0.63, 1.10)
        Part electronic/paper1.00 (0.30, 3.35)0.90 (0.71, 1.14)1.02 (0.69, 1.49)
        No electronicReferenceReferenceReference
    Survey year:
        2007ReferenceReferenceReference
        20080.39 (0.07, 2.04)1.08 (0.77, 1.52)1.18 (0.73, 1.90)
        20090.23 (0.04, 1.36)0.89 (0.66, 1.20)0.84 (0.50, 1.39)
        20100.41 (0.08, 2.12)0.92 (0.63, 1.34)1.01 (0.64, 1.61)
        20110.34 (0.10, 1.16)1.07 (0.78, 1.46)1.68 (1.07, 2.63)
        20120.55 (0.17, 1.79)0.68 (0.51, 0.92)0.92 (0.62, 1.37)
        20130.51 (0.17, 1.54)0.63 (0.46, 0.86)1.09 (0.70, 1.70)
        20141.08 (0.32, 3.70)0.76 (0.56, 1.03)1.22 (0.78, 1.94)
        20151.51 (0.41, 5.54)0.77 (0.54, 1.10)1.50 (0.76, 2.95)
    • ↵* Source of payment other: charity, unknown, other.

    • ↵† Number of past visits: number of visits in the past 12 months to the practice for other problems (excludes index visit). New patient by definition is a new patient to that clinic and could not have any past visits while a regular patient of the clinic; 0 visits means they were an established patient but did not see the physician for any problem in the previous 12 months.

    • CBC, complete blood count; CI, confidence interval; EMR, electronic medical record used in the office; OR, odds ratio.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Model Results for Sensitivity Analysis Including Chronic Primary Pain, Chronic Neuropathic Pain, and Chronic MSK Pain

    Depression Screening OR (95% CI)Any Imaging OR (95% CI)CBC OR (95% CI)
    Patient age (years):
        ≤24ReferenceReferenceReference
        25 to 441.94 (0.34, 11.07)0.86 (0.69, 1.06)2.04 (1.22, 3.40)
        45 to 641.98 (0.34, 11.55)0.99 (0.81, 1.21)2.85 (1.69, 4.81)
        65+2.26 (0.37, 13.97)1.06 (0.85, 1.33)2.93 (1.73, 4.96)
    Patient sex:
        MaleReferenceReferenceReference
        Female1.13 (0.69, 1.86)1.16 (1.01, 1.34)1.25 (0.97, 1.61)
    Patient BMI:
        <25ReferenceReferenceReference
        25 to <300.87 (0.42, 1.83)1.04 (0.81, 1.34)0.87 (0.66, 1.16)
        ≥300.59 (0.21, 1.62)0.93 (0.77, 1.14)0.73 (0.53, 1.01)
    Race/ethnicity:
        Non-Hispanic WhiteReferenceReferenceReference
        Non-Hispanic Black2.49 (1.09, 5.66)0.91 (0.74, 1.14)1.07 (0.77, 1.48)
        Hispanic2.83 (1.26, 6.37)0.83 (0.66, 1.05)1.51 (1.02, 2.25)
        Non-Hispanic other3.16 (1.12, 8.90)1.26 (0.90, 1.75)0.56 (0.29, 1.08)
    Smoking status:
        No tobacco useReferenceReferenceReference
        Current tobacco use2.00 (0.86, 4.70)0.95 (0.79, 1.13)1.09 (0.81, 1.46)
    Source of payment:
        Self-pay0.67 (0.20, 2.19)0.70 (0.42, 1.17)0.70 (0.33, 1.45)
        Private insuranceReferenceReferenceReference
        Medicare/Medicaid/CHIP2.13 (1.13, 4.01)1.05 (0.90, 1.22)1.14 (0.86, 1.49)
        Workers' comp1.19 (0.23, 6.23)1.03 (0.72, 1.47)0.26 (0.08, 0.82)
        Other*2.51 (0.82, 7.64)0.96 (0.63, 1.46)1.13 (0.57, 2.24)
    No. of past visits:†
        New patient0.91 (0.43, 1.94)1.67 (1.36, 2.06)1.46 (1.00, 2.11)
        0 previous visits0.75 (0.26, 2.15)1.63 (1.25, 2.12)0.91 (0.56, 1.49)
        1 previous visitReferenceReferenceReference
        2 to 3 previous visits1.03 (0.48, 2.23)0.93 (0.77, 1.13)0.81 (0.58, 1.13)
        ≥4 previous visits1.21 (0.61, 2.37)0.84 (0.68, 1.03)0.72 (0.50, 1.03)
    Physician specialty:
        Family practiceReferenceReferenceReference
        Internal medicine0.92 (0.50, 1.69)1.09 (0.90, 1.34)1.33 (0.97, 1.82)
        Pediatrics0.14 (0.05, 0.45)2.70 (2.19, 3.33)0.07 (0.04, 0.14)
        Orthopedic surgery1.16 (0.10, 13.63)1.26 (0.87, 1.82)1.64 (0.82, 3.26)
        Neurology0.70 (0.18, 2.74)0.83 (0.60, 1.16)0.31 (0.16, 0.58)
        Oncology1.77 (0.18, 17.79)2.27 (0.69, 7.48)3.50 (1.09, 11.25)
        Others0.26 (0.09, 0.73)0.97 (0.77, 1.23)0.63 (0.40, 1.01)
    Degree:
        MDReferenceReferenceReference
        DO0.41 (0.19, 0.89)0.85 (0.70, 1.02)0.85 (0.64, 1.14)
    Practice type:
        SoloReferenceReferenceReference
        Nonsolo/group1.46 (0.81, 2.64)1.27 (1.09, 1.48)0.98 (0.74, 1.31)
    EMR:
        All electronic1.93 (0.65, 5.71)1.05 (0.87, 1.27)0.83 (0.63, 1.10)
        Part electronic/paper1.04 (0.31, 3.53)0.89 (0.70, 1.14)1.00 (0.68, 1.47)
        No electronicReferenceReferenceReference
    Chronic primary pain:
        Yes2.68 (1.41, 5.09)0.64 (0.43, 0.97)0.62 (0.32, 1.20)
        NoReferenceReferenceReference
    Chronic neuropathic pain:
        Yes0.06 (0.01, 0.52)1.23 (0.57, 2.66)0.48 (0.17, 1.32)
        NoReferenceReferenceReference
    Chronic MSK pain:
        Yes1.28 (0.50, 3.27)1.99 (1.26, 3.12)0.35 (0.19, 0.64)
        NoReferenceReferenceReference
    Survey year:
        2007ReferenceReferenceReference
        20080.41 (0.08, 2.16)1.07 (0.77, 1.50)1.16 (0.72, 1.88)
        20090.24 (0.04, 1.49)0.88 (0.66, 1.18)0.81 (0.49, 1.34)
        20100.42 (0.08, 2.19)0.92 (0.63, 1.35)0.99 (0.63, 1.56)
        20110.35 (0.10, 1.21)1.06 (0.78, 1.45)1.64 (1.05, 2.56)
        20120.56 (0.17, 1.84)0.68 (0.50, 0.91)0.93 (0.62, 1.38)
        20130.52 (0.17, 1.58)0.63 (0.46, 0.86)1.10 (0.70, 1.71)
        20141.07 (0.31, 3.74)0.77 (0.57, 1.04)1.19 (0.75, 1.90)
        20151.53 (0.41, 5.73)0.77 (0.54, 1.10)1.48 (0.75, 2.91)
    • ↵* Source of payment other: charity, unknown, other.

    • ↵† Number of past visits: number of visits in the past 12 months to the practice for other problems (excludes index visit). New patient by definition is a new patient to that clinic and could not have any past visits, while a regular patient of the clinic who has 0 visits means they were an established patient but did not see the physician for any problem in the previous 12 months.

    • BMI, body mass index; CBC, complete blood count; CHIP, Children's Health Insurance Program; CI, confidence interval; EMR, electronic medical record; MSK, musculoskeletal; OR, odds ratio.

    • View popup
    Appendix 1.

    Diagnostic Categories, Diagnoses and Codes

    CategoryDiagnosisICD-9 CODERaw n
    Chronic primary pain (n = 11015)Fibromyalgia, myositis, myofascial pain, neuralgia, muscle/musculoskeletal/neuromuscular729.1478
    Pain, generalized780.96154
    Chronic pain338.29319
    Chronic pain associated with psychosocial dysfunction338.474
    Chronic pain due to trauma338.213
    Chronic neuropathic pain (162)Peripheral neuropathic pain355.71, 355.40
    Regional pain syndrome355.9148
    Regional pain syndrome type 1337.205
    Regional pain syndrome type 1 lower limb337.222
    Regional pain syndrome type 1 upper limb337.214
    Regional pain syndrome type 1 specified site NEC337.210
    Regional pain syndrome type 2 lower limb355.711
    Regional pain syndrome type 2 upper limb354.42
    Chronic musculoskeletal pain (n = 11621)Osteoarthrosis generalized multiple sites715.09220
    Osteoarthrosis shoulder715.1123
    Osteoarthrosis hand715.1410
    Osteoarthrosis hip715.1511
    Osteoarthrosis knee715.1616
    Osteoarthrosis ankle/foot715.1768
    Osteoarthrosis unspecified715.93
    Other unspecified arthropathies7161111
    Internal derangement of kneeChondromalacia patella717717.7547
    Joint pain, unspecified719.42938
    Spondylosis and allied disorders721.0, 0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4260
    Intervertebral disc disorders722, 22.0,0.1,0.2,.4.5,0.51,0.52,0.6,0.7,0.8683
    Other disorders of cervical region723, 723.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.51009
    Other and unspecified disorders of back724, 724.0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.72982
    Peripheral enthesopathies and allied syndromes726, 0.0,0.1,0.12,0.3,0.31,0.32,0.33,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.61,0.64,0.65, 0.7,0.71,0.72,0.731160
    Other disorders of synovium, tendon, and bursa727, 0.0,0.00,0.04,0.05,0.06,0.4,0.6,0.8,0.83,0.89691
    Disorders of muscle, ligament, fascia728.1,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.71,0.89221
    Other disorders of soft tissues729.0,0.1,0.2,0.51373
    • ICD-9, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; NEC, not elsewhere classifiable.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 34 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 34, Issue 3
May/June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Specialty Differences in Initial Evaluation of Patients With Non-Acute Musculoskeletal Pain
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
19 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Specialty Differences in Initial Evaluation of Patients With Non-Acute Musculoskeletal Pain
Lisa C. Carlesso, Debbie Ehrmann Feldman, Richard L. Nahin
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2021, 34 (3) 618-633; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200286

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Specialty Differences in Initial Evaluation of Patients With Non-Acute Musculoskeletal Pain
Lisa C. Carlesso, Debbie Ehrmann Feldman, Richard L. Nahin
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2021, 34 (3) 618-633; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200286
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • COVID-19 Pandemic Practices, Payment Models, and Publication Successes: Family Medicine Studies a Variety of Primary Care Questions
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Chronic Pain
  • Connective Tissue
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Health Care Surveys
  • Musculoskeletal Pain
  • Primary Health Care

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire