Research ArticleArticle

Measuring and Improving Quality in the US: Where Are We Today?

Elizabeth A. McGlynn
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2020, 33 (Supplement) S28-S35; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.S1.190398

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Blumenthal D,
    2. Morone J
    . The heart of power: health and politics in the oval office. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2009, 226.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Morehead MA,
    2. Donaldson R,
    3. Sanderson RS,
    4. et al
    . A study of the quality of hospital care secured by a sample of teamster family members in New York City. New York, NY: Columbia University, School of Public Health and Administrative Medicine; 1964.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lyons TF,
    2. Payne BC
    . The Quality of Physicians’ Health-Care Performance: A comparison against optimal criteria for treatment of the elderly and younger adults in community hospitals. JAMA 1974;227:925–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Rhee SO
    . Factors determining the quality of physician performance in patient care. Med Care 1976;14:733–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wennberg J,
    2. Gittelsohn A
    . Small area variations in health care delivery. Science 1973;182:1102–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Brook RH,
    2. Chassin MR,
    3. Fink A,
    4. Solomon DH,
    5. Kosecoff J,
    6. Park RE
    . A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1986;2:53–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Winslow CM,
    2. Kosecoff JB,
    3. Chassin M,
    4. Kanouse DE,
    5. Brook RH
    . The appropriateness of performing coronary artery bypass surgery. JAMA 1988;260:505–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Winslow CM,
    2. Solomon DH,
    3. Chassin MR,
    4. Kosecoff J,
    5. Merrick NJ,
    6. Brook RH
    . The appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy. N Engl J Med 1988;318:721–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bernstein SJ,
    2. McGlynn EA,
    3. Siu AL,
    4. et al
    . The appropriateness of hysterectomy. A comparison of care in seven health plans. Health Maintenance Organization Quality of Care Consortium. JAMA 1993;269:2398–402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Hilborne LH,
    2. Leape LL,
    3. Bernstein SJ,
    4. et al
    . The appropriateness of use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State. JAMA 1993;269:761–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Leape LL,
    2. Hilborne LH,
    3. Park RE,
    4. et al
    . The appropriateness of use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State. JAMA 1993;269:753–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Bernstein SJ,
    2. Hilborne LH,
    3. Leape LL,
    4. Park RE,
    5. Brook RH
    . The appropriateness of use of cardiovascular procedures in women and men. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:2759–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Kleinman LC,
    2. Kosecoff J,
    3. Dubois RW,
    4. Brook RH
    . The medical appropriateness of tympanostomy tubes proposed for children younger than 16 years in the United States. JAMA 1994;271:1250–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Anderson RJ,
    2. Rice TH,
    3. Kominski GF
    1. McGlynn EA,
    2. Brook RH
    . Ensuring quality of care. In Anderson RJ, Rice TH, Kominski GF, eds. Changing the U.S. health care system: key issues in policy and management. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2001.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Siu AL,
    2. Sonnenberg FA,
    3. Manning WG,
    4. et al
    . Inappropriate use of hospitals in a randomized trial of health insurance plans. N Engl J Med 1986;315:1259–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Chassin MR,
    2. Kosecoff J,
    3. Park RE,
    4. et al
    . Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures. JAMA 1987;258:2533–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Leape LL,
    2. Park RE,
    3. Solomon DH,
    4. Chassin MR,
    5. Kosecoff J,
    6. Brook RH
    . Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services? JAMA 1990;263:669–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Gray D,
    2. Hampton JR,
    3. Bernstein SJ,
    4. Kosecoff J,
    5. Brook RH
    . Audit of coronary angiography and bypass surgery. Lancet 1990;335:1317–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Pilpel D,
    2. Fraser GM,
    3. Kosecoff J,
    4. Weitzman S,
    5. Brook RH
    . Regional differences in appropriateness of cholecystectomy in a prepaid health insurance system. Public Health Rev 1992–1993;20:61–74.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. McGlynn EA,
    2. Naylor CD,
    3. Anderson GM,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of the appropriateness of coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass graft surgery between Canada and New York State. JAMA 1994;272:934–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Bernstein SJ,
    2. Brorsson B,
    3. Aberg T,
    4. Emanuelsson H,
    5. Brook RH,
    6. Werko L
    . Appropriateness of referral of coronary angiography patients in Sweden. SECOR/SBU Project Group. Heart 1999;81:470–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Carlisle DM,
    2. Valdez RB,
    3. Shapiro MR,
    4. Brook RH
    . Geographic variation in rates of selected surgical procedures within Los Angeles County. Health Serv Res 1995;30:27–42.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Schuster MA,
    2. McGlynn EA,
    3. Brook RH
    . How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q 1998;76:517–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kohn LT,
    2. Corrigan JM,
    3. Donaldson MS
    Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1999.
  25. 25.↵
    Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
  26. 26.↵
    1. McGlynn EA,
    2. Asch SM,
    3. Adams J,
    4. et al
    . The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2635–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kerr EA,
    2. McGlynn EA,
    3. Adams J,
    4. Keesey J,
    5. Asch SM
    . Profiling the quality of care in 12 communities: results CQI study. Health Aff (Millbank) 2004;23:247–56.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Asch SM,
    2. Kerr EA,
    3. Keesey J,
    4. et al
    . Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care? N Engl J Med 2006;354:1147–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Mangione-Smith R,
    2. DeCristofaro AH,
    3. Setodji CM,
    4. et al
    . The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1515–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hannan EL,
    2. Barach PR,
    3. Jacobs JP,
    4. Lipshultz SE,
    5. Laussen PC
    , eds. Public reporting of cardiac data: pros, cons, and lessons for the future. Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Care 2015;1:467–77.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Totten AM,
    2. Wagner J,
    3. Tiwari A,
    4. O’Haire C,
    5. Griffin J,
    6. Walker M
    . Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science (vol. 5, public reporting as a quality strategy). Evid Rep Technol Assess, No 208.5. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.
  32. 32.↵
    1. Campanella P,
    2. Vukovic V,
    3. Parente P,
    4. Sulejmani A,
    5. Ricciardi W,
    6. Specchia ML
    . The impact of public reporting on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:296.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Schlesinger M,
    2. Kanouse DE,
    3. Martino SC,
    4. Shaller D,
    5. Rybowski L
    . Complexity, public reporting, and choice of doctors: a look inside the blackest box of consumer behavior. Med Care Res Rev 2014;71:38S–64S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Werner R,
    2. Kolstad JT,
    3. Stuart KA,
    4. Polsy D
    . The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement. Health Aff (Millbank) 2011;30:690–8.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    1. Mendelson A,
    2. Kondo K,
    3. Damberg C,
    4. et al
    . The effects of pay-for-performance programs on health, health care use, and processes of care: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2017;166:341–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Lester H,
    2. Schmittdiel J,
    3. Selby J,
    4. et al
    . The impact of removing financial incentives from clinical quality indicators: longitudinal analysis of four Kaiser Permanente indicators. BMJ 2010;340:c1898.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Minchin M,
    2. Roland M,
    3. Richardson J,
    4. Rowark S,
    5. Guthrie B
    . Quality of care in the United Kingdom after removal of financial incentives. N Engl J Med 2018;379:948–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Chee TT,
    2. Ryan AM,
    3. Wasfy JH,
    4. Borden WB
    . Current state of value-based purchasing programs. Circulation 2016;133:2197–205.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Ryan AM,
    2. Krinsky S,
    3. Maurer KA,
    4. Dimick JB
    . Changes in hospital quality associated with hospital value-based purchasing. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2358–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: Medicare payment policy. Washington, DC: MedPAC; 2019.
  41. 41.↵
    Institute of Medicine. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
  42. 42.↵
    1. Peterson LE,
    2. Blackburn BE,
    3. Puffer JC,
    4. Phillips RC
    . Family physicians’ quality interventions and performance improvement through the ABFM diabetes performance in practice module. Ann Fam Med 2014;12:17–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. About the evidence-based practice centers program. Rockville, MD. 2015. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/overview/index.html. Accessed October 27, 2019.
  44. 44.↵
    Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Cochrane Library. 2019. Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/about-cdsr. Accessed October 27, 2019.
  45. 45.↵
    1. Mancher M,
    2. Miller Wolman D,
    3. Greenfield S,
    4. Steinberg E
    1. Graham R
    , Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, eds. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
  46. 46.↵
    1. Wachter R
    . The digital doctor: hope, hype, and harm at the dawn of medicine’s computer age. McGraw-Hill Education; 2015.
  47. 47.↵
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2018. National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report. 2019. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhqdr18/index.html. Accessed October 27, 2019.
  48. 48.↵
    1. Levine DM,
    2. Linder JA,
    3. Landon BE
    . The quality of outpatient care delivered to adults in the United States, 2002 to 2013. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:1778–90.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.↵
    National Committee for Quality Assurance. State of health care quality, 2018. 2019. Available from: https://www.ncqa.org/report-cards/health-plans/state-of-health-care-quality-report/. Accessed October 2, 2019.
  50. 50.↵
    Institute of Medicine. Vital signs: core metrics for health and health care progress. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015.
  51. 51.↵
    1. Schilling L,
    2. Chase A,
    3. Liu AY,
    4. et al
    . Kaiser Permanente’s performance improvement system, part 1: from benchmarking to executing on strategic priorities. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2010;36:484–98.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    1. Rodriguez HP,
    2. Scoggins JF,
    3. von Glahn T,
    4. Zaslavsky AM,
    5. Safran DG
    . Attributing sources of variation in patients’ experiences of ambulatory care. Med Care 2009;47:835–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    1. O’Connor PJ,
    2. Rush WA,
    3. Davidson G,
    4. et al
    . Variation in quality of diabetes care at the levels of patient, physician, and clinic. Prev Chronic Dis 2008;5:A15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Selby JV,
    2. Schmittdiel JA,
    3. Lee J,
    4. et al
    . Meaningful variation in performance: what does variation in quality tell us about improving quality? Med Care 2010;48:133–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    1. Zaslavsky AM
    . Using hierarchical models to attribute sources of variation in consumer assessments of health care. Statist Med 2007;26:1885–900.
    OpenUrl
  56. 56.↵
    1. Jaffe MG,
    2. Lee GA,
    3. Young JD,
    4. Sidney S,
    5. Go AS
    . Improved blood pressure control associated with a large-scale hypertension program. JAMA 2013;310:699–705.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    1. Jaffe MG,
    2. Young JD
    . The Kaiser Permanente Northern California story: improving hypertension control from 44% to 90% in 13 years (2000–2013). J Clin Hypertens 2016;18:260–1.
    OpenUrl
  58. 58.↵
    1. McGlynn EA,
    2. Schneider EC,
    3. Kerr EA
    . Reimagining quality measurement. N Engl J Med 2014;371:2150–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    1. McGlynn EA,
    2. Kerr EA
    . Creating safe harbors for quality measurement innovation and improvement. JAMA 2016;315:129–30.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Keywords