Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Rural Family Medicine Clinicians' Motivations to Participate in a Pragmatic Obesity Trial

Joanna Veazey Brooks, Kim S. Kimminau, Stacy McCrea-Robertson and Christie Befort
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2020, 33 (5) 736-744; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.200083
Joanna Veazey Brooks
From the Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City (JVB, SM-R, CB); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City Kansas City (KSK).
PhD, MBE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kim S. Kimminau
From the Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City (JVB, SM-R, CB); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City Kansas City (KSK).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stacy McCrea-Robertson
From the Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City (JVB, SM-R, CB); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City Kansas City (KSK).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christie Befort
From the Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City (JVB, SM-R, CB); Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City Kansas City (KSK).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of Participating Practices and Clinician Staffing Levels (n = 21)

    Practice CharacteristicsValues
    RUCA code*, n (%)
        Isolated rural11 (52.4)
        Small rural5 (23.8)
        Large rural5 (23.8)
    Practice type, n (%)
        Rural health clinic10 (47.6)
        Federally qualified health center2 (9.5)
        Other (private/hospital owned)9 (42.9)
    Practice ownership, n (%)
        Hospital owned11 (52.4)
        Privately owned8 (38.1)
        Board owned2 (9.5)
    Number of staff, median (range)
        FTE MDs/DOs4 (2–23)
        FTE advanced practice providers3 (0–6)
    • DO, doctor of osteopathic medicine; FTE, full-time equivalent; MD, doctor of medicine.

    • ↵* RUCA code refers to rural-urban commuter area codes. Large rural core refers to areas in which primary flow is within an urban cluster of 10,000 to 49,999; small rural core refers to areas in which the primary flow is within an urban cluster of 2,500 to 9,999; isolated rural refers to areas in which the primary flow is to a tract outside any urban area or cluster.

    • View popup
    Appendix.

    Interview Guide Based on Constructs and Subdomains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

    Overall decision-making/motivationWhy did your practice decide to participate in the RE-POWER trial? How was the decision made? How important were factors related to improving care for obesity, improving overall patient experience, improving your training in weight loss counseling, gaining experience in research, and the financial incentives (each rated on 5-point scale)
    Intervention characteristics
        Relative advantageWhat are your thoughts about whether or not the intervention will be a better alternative to what you are already doing or have tried in the past?
        Design quality and packagingWhat has been your experience with the intervention materials so far?
        AdaptabilityIs there anything that would make the intervention fit better for your practice?
        ComplexityHow difficult do you think it will be to implement the intervention?
    Inner setting
        Climate, tension for changeHow much do other people at your practice feel that this program is needed to better help your patients lose weight?
        Climate, compatibilityHow does this program fit within the overall approach to improving patient care at your practice?
        Climate, relative priorityHow important is this program compared to other priorities in your practice?
        Available resourcesDo you feel you have sufficient information, resources, and space to make the study work?
    Process, planning*What issues did you encounter when planning the implementation of the study?
    Characteristics of individuals*How is the extra work distributed among staff? Does it seem fair, reasonable, sustainable?
    • ↵* These domains were asked but not reported on in this study.

    • RE-POWER, Rural Engagement in Primary Care for Optimizing Weight Reduction.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 33 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 33, Issue 5
September/October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rural Family Medicine Clinicians' Motivations to Participate in a Pragmatic Obesity Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Rural Family Medicine Clinicians' Motivations to Participate in a Pragmatic Obesity Trial
Joanna Veazey Brooks, Kim S. Kimminau, Stacy McCrea-Robertson, Christie Befort
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2020, 33 (5) 736-744; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.200083

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Rural Family Medicine Clinicians' Motivations to Participate in a Pragmatic Obesity Trial
Joanna Veazey Brooks, Kim S. Kimminau, Stacy McCrea-Robertson, Christie Befort
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2020, 33 (5) 736-744; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.200083
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Changing Face of Primary Care Research and Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs) in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Behavior Therapy
  • Family Physicians
  • Motivation
  • Obesity
  • Obesity Management
  • Practice-based Research
  • Qualitative Research
  • Primary Health Care
  • Rural Health
  • Weight Loss

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire