Article CommentaryCommentary

The Changing Face of Primary Care Research and Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs) in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Hazel Tapp
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2020, 33 (5) 645-649; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.200400

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Fauci AS,
    2. Lane HC,
    3. Redfield RR
    . Covid-19—Navigating the uncharted. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1268–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mays GP,
    2. Hogg RA,
    3. Castellanos-Cruz DM,
    4. Hoover AG,
    5. Fowler LC
    . Public health research implementation and translation: evidence from practice-based research networks. Am J Prevent Med 2013;45:752–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Nagykaldi Z
    . Practice-based research networks at the crossroads of research translation. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:725–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Tapp H,
    2. Dulin M
    . The science of primary health-care improvement: potential and use of community-based participatory research by practice-based research networks for translation of research into practice. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2010;235:290–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fagnan LJ,
    2. Simpson MJ,
    3. Daly JM,
    4. et al
    . Adapting boot camp translation methods to engage clinician/patient research teams within practice-based research networks: a report from the INSTTEPP Trial and Meta-LARC Consortium. J Patient Cent Res Rev 2018;5:298–303.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Haggerty T,
    2. Lewis W,
    3. Plaugher C,
    4. et al
    . Residents' views on research and quality improvement training can guide practice-based research network collaboration. W V Med J 2018;2018.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Goldstein KM,
    2. Vogt D,
    3. Hamilton A,
    4. et al
    . Practice-based research networks add value to evidence-based quality improvement. Healthc (Amst) 2018;6:128–34.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kairys S,
    2. Wasserman R,
    3. Pace W
    . Practice-based quality improvement/research networks: full speed forward. Acad Pediatr 2013;13:S12–S13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Mold JW,
    2. Peterson KA
    . Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med 2005;3:S12–S20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Tierney WM,
    2. Oppenheimer CC,
    3. Hudson BL,
    4. et al
    . A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2007;5:242–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Roper R,
    3. Gaglioti A,
    4. Nease DE Jr.
    . Practice-based research networks: strategic opportunities to advance implementation research for health equity. Ethn Dis 2019;29:113–8.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Mold J,
    3. Fagnan L
    . Practice-based research—“Blue highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007;297:403–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Bonner C,
    2. Fajardo MA,
    3. Doust J,
    4. McCaffery K,
    5. Trevena L
    . Implementing cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines to translate evidence-based medicine and shared decision making into general practice: theory-based intervention development, qualitative piloting and quantitative feasibility. Implement Sci 2019;14:86.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Riley-Behringer M,
    2. Davis MM,
    3. Werner JJ,
    4. Fagnan LJ,
    5. Stange KC
    . The evolving collaborative relationship between practice-based research networks (PBRNs) and clinical and translational science awardees (CTSAs). J Clin Trans Sci 2017;1:301–9.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Gaglioti AH,
    2. Walston D,
    3. Vasquez Guzman CE,
    4. et al
    . A practical approach to establishing a practice-based research network stakeholder engagement infrastructure. J Am Board Fam Med 2019;32:695–704.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Westerlund A,
    2. Sundberg L,
    3. Nilsen P
    . Implementation of implementation science knowledge: the research-practice gap paradox. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2019;16:332–4.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. DeVoe JE,
    2. Likumahuwa-Ackman SM,
    3. Angier HE,
    4. et al
    . A practice-based research network (PBRN) roadmap for evaluating COVID-19 in community health centers: a report from the OCHIN PBRN. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:774–778.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Furlan AD,
    2. Pajer KA,
    3. Gardner W,
    4. MacLeod B
    . Project ECHO: building capacity to manage complex conditions in rural, remote and underserved areas. Can J Rural Med 2019;24:115–20.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. McDonnell MM,
    2. Elder NC,
    3. Stock R,
    4. Wolf M,
    5. Steeves-Reece A,
    6. Graham T
    . Project ECHO integrated within the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network (ORPRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:789–795.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ye J,
    2. Zhang R,
    3. Bannon JE,
    4. et al
    . Identifying practice facilitation delays and barriers in primary care quality improvement: a report from Evidence NOW. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:655–664.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. VanVorst RF,
    3. Main DS,
    4. Herbert C
    . Community-based participatory research in practice-based research networks. Ann Family Med 2006;4:8–14.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Engster SA,
    2. Fascetti C,
    3. Mykita A,
    4. Pompa K,
    5. Cohen Reis E
    . Bringing parent voices into a pediatric research network through a virtual parent panel. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:665–674.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Dickinson WP,
    2. Nease DE Jr.,
    3. Rhyne RL,
    4. et al
    . Practice transformation support and patient engagement to improve cardiovascular care: from EvidenceNOW Southwest (ENSW). J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:675–686.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Mungia R,
    2. Funkhouser E,
    3. Makhija SK,
    4. et al
    . Practitioner engagement in activities of the national dental practice-based research network (PBRN): 7-Year Results. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:687–697.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Nagykaldi Z,
    2. Scheid D,
    3. Zhao YD,
    4. Mishra B,
    5. Greever-Rice T
    . A sustainable model for preventive services in rural counties: the Healthier Together study. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:698–706.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Pinto RM,
    2. Park S
    . COVID-19 pandemic disrupts HIV continuum of care and prevention: implications for research and practice concerning community-based organizations and frontline providers. AIDS Behav 2020 [Epub ahead of print].
  27. 27.↵
    1. Corvin J,
    2. Aguado Loi C,
    3. Alfonso M,
    4. et al
    . Translating research into practice: employing community-based mixed methods approaches to address chronic disease and depression among Latinos. J Behav Health Serv Res 2017;44:574–89.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Krist AH,
    2. Hochheimer CJ,
    3. Sabo RT,
    4. et al
    . Patient, clinician, and communication factors associated with colorectal cancer screening. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:779–784.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Heintzman J,
    2. Kaufmann J,
    3. Lucas J,
    4. et al
    . Asthma care quality, language, and ethnicity in a multi-state network of low-income children. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:707–715.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kwan BM,
    2. Rementer J,
    3. Richie ND,
    4. et al
    . Adapting diabetes shared medical appointments to fit context for practice-based research (PBR). J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:716–727.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Coleman K,
    2. Wagner E,
    3. Schaefer J,
    4. Reid R
    . Redefining primary care for the 21st century. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016.
  32. 32.↵
    1. Sabo RT,
    2. Etz RS,
    3. Gonzalez MM,
    4. et al
    . Low-intensity intervention supports diabetes registry implementation: a cluster-randomized trial in the Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network (ACORN). J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:728–735.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Veazey Brooks J,
    2. Kimminau KS,
    3. McCrea-Robertson S,
    4. Befort C
    . Rural family medicine clinicians' motivations to participate in a pragmatic obesity trial. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:736–744.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Norton MC,
    2. Haftman ME,
    3. Buzzard LN
    . Impact of physician-pharmacist collaboration on diabetes outcomes and health care use. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:745–753.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Montano MF,
    2. Mehdi H,
    3. Nash DB
    . Annotated bibliography: understanding ambulatory care practices in the context of patient safety and quality improvement. Am J Med Qual 2016;31:29S–43S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Lai AY,
    2. Yuan CT,
    3. Marsteller JA,
    4. et al
    . Patient safety in primary care: conceptual meanings to patients and the health care team. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:754–764.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section