Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Brief ReportBrief Report

Factors Influencing Uptake of Changes to Clinical Preventive Guidelines

Vivian Jiang, E. Marshall Brooks, Sebastian T. Tong, John Heintzman and Alex H. Krist
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2020, 33 (2) 271-278; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190146
Vivian Jiang
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (VJ, EMB, AHK); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR (JH); Oregon Community Health Information Network (OCHIN), Portland OR (JH).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Marshall Brooks
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (VJ, EMB, AHK); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR (JH); Oregon Community Health Information Network (OCHIN), Portland OR (JH).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian T. Tong
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (VJ, EMB, AHK); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR (JH); Oregon Community Health Information Network (OCHIN), Portland OR (JH).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Heintzman
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (VJ, EMB, AHK); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR (JH); Oregon Community Health Information Network (OCHIN), Portland OR (JH).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex H. Krist
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (VJ, EMB, AHK); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR (JH); Oregon Community Health Information Network (OCHIN), Portland OR (JH).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Clinician and Practice Leader Perspectives on Factors Affecting Implementation of Changes in Evidence

    Themes and FindingsExample Quotes
    Patient Factors
    Trust and fear strongly influence patient decisions
    • Patients largely rely on clinician recommendations

    • Patients appreciate clinicians explaining how a guideline applies to them

    • Guideline changes can foster patient distrust

    • Doing less sometimes makes patients feel less cared for

    • Personal experiences influence decisions

    Patient education (mostly) helps guideline adoption
    • Informed patients are typically more engaged and activated

    • But being more engaged does not always mean ready to change

    • Less engaged patients may do whatever their doctors recommend

    • Misinformation can undermine evidence-based care

    • But being accurately informed about the evidence does not necessarily mean a patient will want to follow the evidence

    “I think most patients just want you to make a recommendation. Like prostate cancer, I support informed decision-making and they say, ‘just tell me what to do.” (Clinician)
    “I always knew that doing yearly paps was not a good idea…A lot of that stuff, especially when it’s less services, I’m only doing because patients are so used to it.” (Clinician)
    “Quite a few folks are leery about statins. The’ve seen ads on TV saying there are potential side effects. ‘I know my Aunt Suzi had problems and I’m not going to do that to myself.’” (Clinician)
    “I think our population is pretty well educated but, by the same token, they’re also creatures of habit. Nobody likes change; everyone resists change.” (Practice Leader)
    “Sometimes people educate themselves and are all for following guidelines, other folks have educated themselves and have determined they are pretty hesitant.” (Clinician)
    Clinician Factors
    Clinicians believe in tailoring guidelines to individual patients
    • Clinicians pride themselves on knowing their patients

    • Clinicians like to discuss guidelines and share decisions with patients

    • Clinicians may prioritize other patient needs (co-morbidities, patient beliefs, cost) over guidelines

    Clinicians’ personal beliefs impact guideline adoption
    • Clinicians are quicker to adopt guidelines that they agree with and make sense

    • Clinicians’ personal healthcare experiences at times inform guideline recommendations given to patients

    • De-escalating services can create fear of missing something

    • Negative patient outcomes from prior misses can increase fear

    “I’m a big believer in kind of the mutual decision; not just me telling them what to do, and realistically if they don’t believe what I’m saying they won’t do it anyway.” (Clinician)
    “We had a patient who died of cervical cancer and she had had a Pap smear six months before that was normal …you know if you’re counting on a test to give you a five year pass, that’s a long time.” (Clinician)
    “I always knew that doing yearly Paps was not a good idea. I was sort of waiting for that to happen.” (Clinician)“Mammography…I tell them that I personally am experimenting on myself with every other year but I let them decide.” (Clinician)
    Practice Factors
    Attention to workflow and staff roles support guideline implementation
    • Integrating guidelines into clinic workflow decreases dependence on clinician memory

    • Clinical support staff who work at the top of their licenses can enhance the promotion of guidelines

    • Practices dedicated protected time to define workflow and roles

    Practice culture shapes the adoption and implementation of evidence-based guidelines
    • Practices work to continually evolve and become better

    • Having a teaching mission helps build a culture of evidence-based care and keeping up-to-date with guidelines.

    • Practices have regular meetings to share knowledge about care

    • Clinicians and staff who participate in committees to define health system policies carry knowledge back to their practices

    • Practices view quality improvement as a continual process

    “When we weren’t getting workflows going for new guidelines, some providers were doing it and some weren’t and it was sort of left up to memory…sometimes you leave too much up to the individual provider and there’s just too much to keep in your head.” (Clinician)
    “We’re trying to have the nurses [sic] be the frontline more and more…They are protecting the provider’s time…” (Clinician)
    “Once a month [we hold] a provider meeting where we do peer review…[and discuss] case studies or interesting fun facts.” (Practice Leader)
    “We participate in a couple of committees…then there are practice councils that our nurses attend…I would say updates regarding guidelines come through all those different avenues ” (Practice Leader)
    Health System Factors
    Maintaining EHR functionality is the main way health systems promote guideline adoption and implementation
    • EHR alerts are useful for reinforcing and reminding clinicians about guidelines

    • EHR templates and standing orders can further incorporate rooming staff into workflow when implementing a new guideline

    • Patient portals can help communicate guidelines to patients

    • There are noticeable gaps in EHR alerts and functionality

    Health systems standardize guideline adoption and implementation processes
    • Health system committees often review and make recommendations about guideline implementation

    • Practices typically cannot institute major changes in guidelines without approval by the health system’s quality committee.

    • Financial interests and input from specialists can shape health system guideline recommendations

    “The quality tab has been very helpful because of the prompts that it offers you for things that you might have otherwise forgotten.” (Clinician)
    “We are guided into following or keeping up-to-date on guidelines because it’s entered in the medical record…it flags us that somebody is due for something.” (Clinician)
    “If it’s something that is brand-new, like when Shingrix came out, we take it to the quality [committee] for approval, and then we send an email out to the clinical staff, the clerical staff, and the providers.” (Practice Leader)
    “Building the algorithm in the EHR is not just a guideline-based recommendation, it has to be a recommendation that the clinical organization agrees with from a financial or strategic perspective…does the screening have a negative financial impact on my organization? That’s where the PSOs and CMOs and COOs decide.” (Clinician)
    Environmental Factors
    Media and specialists can promote both evidence-based care and unnecessary care
    • Patients increasingly hear about prevention through ads

    • Specialists may promote services that do not follow guidelines

    • For-profit organizations often promote unnecessary services

    Traditional barriers to care were reported, but resources and solutions existed to help patients
    • Clinicians and staff generally reported good access to care

    • Health systems and communities try to reduce barriers to care

    • Insurance coverage for prevention improves access to care, but lag time in coverage can delay adoption of new guidelines

    “It all depends on the marketing of different things…like for the new shingles vaccine, people are just coming to us like crazy.” (Practice Leader)
    “For colonoscopies, we got an arrangement with the local hospital medical group to take four to five uninsured patients per year to do colonoscopy” (Clinician)
    “At a talk we had one time from an oncologist…he said he’s been ordering [low dose chest CT for lung cancer screening] on all his patients now…he was completely unaware of the ages, the pack-year, nothing.” (Clinician)
    “They came out with the Prevnar recommendation, but Medicare didn’t cover it for about a year. What good does it do if everybody’s 65 and they don’t have coverage?” (Clinician)
    Guideline Factors
    Some guidelines are easier to adopt and implement
    • If they can be incorporated into workflow

    • If they can be programmed into the EHR as an alert

    • If they can be appropriately measured for audit and feedback

    • If patients who benefit from the services can be clearly identified

    Some guidelines are harder to adopt and implement
    • If they frequently change or change more radically

    • If there are differing guidelines from multiple groups

    • If the topic is less familiar to patients

    • If the results can be difficult to explain to patients

    • If they involve services outside the clinic

    “Now that we have that built into our workflow to offer lung cancer screening to patients who qualify, that’s been something we’ve gotten better about.” (Clinician)
    “I think having the risk calculators…having some numbers to discuss with people about what we think their risk is and how much the risk might be reduced if they took medicine, I think that’s helpful.” (Clinician)
    “AAA screens…It’s not one of our core quality measures…It’s not a meaningful-use measure…I haven’t ignored it…but I haven’t directly addressed it because I feel like we’re working on so many quality things.” (Clinician)
    “Mammography is a little harder…the guideline has changed so many times over the years.” (Clinician)
    • EHR, electronic health record; PSO, patient safety organization; CMO, Chief Medical Officer; COO, Chief Operating Officer; CT, Computed Tomography.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Emerging Practice Categories for Approach to Guideline Adoption and Implementation

    CharacteristicsExample Quotes
    Clinician-directed: Clinicians independently decide which guidelines to implement and how to implement them.
    Learning New Evidence: Clinicians learn on their own with limited formal structures for clinicians or staff to learn from one another.
    Topic Leads: No identified clinician or staff leads to make decisions for the practice.
    Practice-Wide Updates: Information may come from the practice or health system level, but there is no expectation for all clinicians to abide by the same clinical guidelines.
    Implementation Process: Done by individual clinicians.
    “I usually kind of decide that on my own based on what I’ve learned up to this point in time and I’ll search my own experiences. I would be the first to say that at times I’m kind of just a late adopter for certain things even though there may be a guideline out. Sometimes I don’t always agree with it” (Clinician)
    Practice-directed: Practices collectively decide which guidelines to implement and how to implement them.
    Learning New Evidence: There are structures within the practice through which clinicians can share knowledge with one another.
    Topic Leads: Individual clinicians or staff leads with topic expertise lead the practice in a uniform clinical approach.
    Practice-wide Updates: Information from the health system is discussed among everyone in the practice, but ultimately the practice has guideline decision-making autonomy.
    Implementation Process: Large emphasis on workflow with clinicians and staff working together to determine the best workflow process.
    “We have two meetings a month within our clinic where providers get together for just under an hour. One is a peer review meeting. There’s always education that’s part of that. And then we have a second meeting that’s more focused on workflows but oftentimes that dovetails with education and being made aware of guidelines.” (Clinician)
    “The EHR, I mean we have these quality guidelines now that kind of drive me insane. They’re helpful to a point. They kind of make me crazy too because I don’t feel like those are as up-to-date as we are maybe.” (Practice Leader)
    Health system-directed: The health system decides which guidelines to implement and how to implement them and then informs practices and clinicians.
    Learning New Evidence: The health system regularly updates clinicians and staff about new clinical guidelines.
    Topic Leads: Clinicians and staff serve on health system committees to make system level changes.
    Practice-wide Updates: Evidence changes are reviewed by the health system, often a quality committee, before making routine changes to practice.
    Implementation Process: The EHR is utilized heavily to define the workflow.
    “I chair our quality committee; so, if it’s something that’s really new or different, then generally the quality committee will take a look at it and we’ll talk about, you know, is there something we need to do? Should we advertise this? If it’s something really different from what the old guideline was, usually the quality committee will talk about it and publicize it.” (Clinician)
    “We just made it happen. It wasn’t open for discussion to be honest. There’s not a lot open for discussion as far as changes go. We just say this is how it’s going to be; just grumble and move forward.” (Practice Leader)
    “we do have a lot of standing orders and we do have a lot of adult immunizations, things that the nurses can do on their own…” (Practice Leader)
    • EHR, electronic health record.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family  Medicine: 33 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 33, Issue 2
March/April 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Factors Influencing Uptake of Changes to Clinical Preventive Guidelines
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
19 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Factors Influencing Uptake of Changes to Clinical Preventive Guidelines
Vivian Jiang, E. Marshall Brooks, Sebastian T. Tong, John Heintzman, Alex H. Krist
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2020, 33 (2) 271-278; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190146

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Factors Influencing Uptake of Changes to Clinical Preventive Guidelines
Vivian Jiang, E. Marshall Brooks, Sebastian T. Tong, John Heintzman, Alex H. Krist
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2020, 33 (2) 271-278; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190146
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinicians opinions on recommending aspirin to prevent colorectal cancer to Australians aged 50-70 years: a qualitative study
  • Many Family Medicine Successful Interventions and Clinical Reviews for Common Illnesses
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association of Social Needs with Diabetes Outcomes in an Older Population
  • Insurance Instability Among Community-Based Health Center Patients with Diabetes Post-Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion
  • Factors Influencing Changing Scopes of Practice Among Contemporary Graduates of the Nation’s Largest Family Medicine Residency
Show more Brief Report

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Implementation Science
  • Preventive Medicine
  • Qualitative Research

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire