Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
PDSA Cycle for Development of Prediabetes Shared Decision Aid.
- Figure A1.
Prediabetes Shared Decision Aid.
Tables
- Table 1.
Patient and Stakeholder Advisory Committee’s Partnership Self-Assessment Tool Results (n = 8)
Section 1 True False Don’t Know I was notified of this meeting with sufficient notice. 88% 12% — The meeting started and ended on time. 88% 12% — Section 2 Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree The agenda is clear. 88% 12% — — — The objectives are appropriate. 75% 25% — — — The location of the meeting is functional. 75% 25% — — — Information shared in this meeting is high yield. 88% 12% — — — The handouts are useful. 75% 25% — — — This meeting was productive. 88% 12% — — — The action or follow-up plan is clearly communicated. 75% 25% — — — The purpose and function of this committee is well-defined. 71% 29% — — — Section 3 Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree I am generally satisfied with the activities of the partnership. 50% 50% — — — I have a sense of ownership in what the partnership does and accomplishes. 57% 29% 14% — — Participation in the partnership has increased my knowledge and understanding of the other organizations represented. 50% 25% 25% — — I feel comfortable talking openly and honestly at partnership meetings. 63% 37% — — — I am comfortable bringing new ideas to the partnership meetings. 63% 37% — — — Partnership members respect each other’s points of view even when they disagree. 100% — — — — I am satisfied with the progress that has been made by the partnership to study the problem. 71% 29% — — — All members of the partnership have a voice in decisions made by the group. 88% 12% — — — Demographics n (%)/M (S.D.) Race Black or African American 5 (10%) White or Caucasian 38 (76%) Other 7 (14%) Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino 9 (18%) Not Hispanic or Latino 40 (80%) Patient Declined/Refused 1 (2%) Sex Female 33 (66%) Male 17 (34%) Age 18 to 35 3 (6%) 36 to 50 9 (18%) 51 to 60 17 (34%) 61 to 70 16 (32%) 71 to 75 5 (10%) A1c completed in past 2 years 43 (86%) Average A1c (%) 6.0 0.19 Average days between patients’ most recent A1c lab and the shared decision aid intervention 189 140 Average number of visits in 24 months 6.22 5.32 Note. M, mean; S.D., standard deviation.
Survey Questions Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Initial post-encounter patient survey (n = 50) My doctor and I made a decision together about how to treat my prediabetes during my visit 60% 32% 6% — 2% I had an important role in the decision-making process 66% 28% 6% — — The shared decision-making tool prepared me to make a decision about my prediabetes prevention plan 48% 48% 4% — — The shared decision-making tool helped me think about the pros and cons of each option to prevent diabetes 56% 44% — — — The shared decision-making tool helped me think about which pros and cons are most important to me 57% 43% — — — 6-week post-encounter patient survey (n = 30) I have been following the diabetes prevention plan most days 13% 70% 10% — 7% My plan reflects what my doctor and I discussed 27% 60% 7% — 7% I am considering changing my diabetes prevention plan 7% 20% 23% 30% 20%
