Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Modifying Provider Vitamin D Screening Behavior in Primary Care

Nigel L. Rozario, Alica Sparling, Ryan Burns, Andrew McWilliams, Jennifer H. Brady, Marc Kowalkowski and Jason Roberge
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2020, 33 (2) 252-261; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190323
Nigel L. Rozario
From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (NLR, AS, RB, MK, JR, AM); Atrium Health Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Charlotte, NC (AM); Carolinas Physician Alliance, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (JHB).
PhD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alica Sparling
From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (NLR, AS, RB, MK, JR, AM); Atrium Health Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Charlotte, NC (AM); Carolinas Physician Alliance, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (JHB).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan Burns
From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (NLR, AS, RB, MK, JR, AM); Atrium Health Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Charlotte, NC (AM); Carolinas Physician Alliance, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (JHB).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew McWilliams
From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (NLR, AS, RB, MK, JR, AM); Atrium Health Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Charlotte, NC (AM); Carolinas Physician Alliance, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (JHB).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer H. Brady
From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (NLR, AS, RB, MK, JR, AM); Atrium Health Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Charlotte, NC (AM); Carolinas Physician Alliance, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (JHB).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Kowalkowski
From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (NLR, AS, RB, MK, JR, AM); Atrium Health Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Charlotte, NC (AM); Carolinas Physician Alliance, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (JHB).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason Roberge
From the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (NLR, AS, RB, MK, JR, AM); Atrium Health Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Charlotte, NC (AM); Carolinas Physician Alliance, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (JHB).
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical evidence shows minimal benefit to vitamin D screening and subsequent treatment in the general population. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of 2 light-touch interventions on reducing vitamin D test orders.

Methods: The outcomes were weekly average vitamin D rates, computed from adult primary care encounters (preventive or nonpreventive) with a family medicine (FM) or internal medicine (IM) provider from June 14, 2018 through December 12, 2018. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis and estimated the cost impact of the interventions. The interventions consisted of an educational memo (August 9, 2018) distributed to providers and removal of the vitamin D test (FM: August 15, 2018; IM: October 17, 2018) from the providers’ quick order screen in the electronic health record. Change in order rates were analyzed among physicians (MDs and DOs), physician assistants (PAs), and nurse practitioners (NPs).

Results: There were 587,506 primary care encounters (FM = 367,947; IM = 219,559). Vitamin D order rates decreased from 6.9% (FM = 5.1%; IM = 9.9%) to 5.2% (FM = 4% [P < .01], IM = 7.9% [P < .01]). For FM, the vitamin D test order rate continued to fall at a 0.08% per week rate after the interventions (end of study: 2.73%). The education intervention showed a relative decrease in each provider type (FM-physician = 16% [P < .01], FM-PA = 47% [P < .01], FM-NP = 20% [P = .01], IM-physician = 14% [P = .02], IM-PA = 52% [P < .01], IM-NP = 34% [P = .04]). Annualized savings was approximately 1 million dollars.

Conclusions: Emailed evidence-based provider education may be an effective tool for modifying providers’ vitamin D test ordering behavior. The lack of the effectiveness of the vitamin D test removal from the quick order screen found for IM highlights the challenges facing simple electronic health record interventions when multiple alternate ordering pathways exist.

  • Electronic Mail
  • Health Policy
  • Interrupted Time Series Analysis
  • Population Health
  • Primary Health Care
  • Vitamin D
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family  Medicine: 33 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 33, Issue 2
March/April 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Modifying Provider Vitamin D Screening Behavior in Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Modifying Provider Vitamin D Screening Behavior in Primary Care
Nigel L. Rozario, Alica Sparling, Ryan Burns, Andrew McWilliams, Jennifer H. Brady, Marc Kowalkowski, Jason Roberge
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2020, 33 (2) 252-261; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190323

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Modifying Provider Vitamin D Screening Behavior in Primary Care
Nigel L. Rozario, Alica Sparling, Ryan Burns, Andrew McWilliams, Jennifer H. Brady, Marc Kowalkowski, Jason Roberge
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2020, 33 (2) 252-261; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190323
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Patterns of Clinical Care Subsequent to Nonindicated Vitamin D Testing in Primary Care
  • Yonder: Vitamin D screening, startups, social distancing, and world leaders on Twitter
  • Many Family Medicine Successful Interventions and Clinical Reviews for Common Illnesses
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Electronic Mail
  • Health Policy
  • Interrupted Time Series Analysis
  • Population Health
  • Primary Health Care
  • Vitamin D

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire