Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Lowering Gestational Diabetes Risk by Prenatal Weight Gain Counseling

Evelyn M. Figueroa, Kara Nitti and Stephen M. Sladek
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2020, 33 (2) 189-197; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190203
Evelyn M. Figueroa
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago (EVF); Advocate Research Institute, Oaklawn, IL (KN); Advocate Christ Family Medicine Residency, Oak Lawn, IL (SMS).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kara Nitti
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago (EVF); Advocate Research Institute, Oaklawn, IL (KN); Advocate Christ Family Medicine Residency, Oak Lawn, IL (SMS).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen M. Sladek
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago (EVF); Advocate Research Institute, Oaklawn, IL (KN); Advocate Christ Family Medicine Residency, Oak Lawn, IL (SMS).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Institute of Medicine 2009 Pregnancy Weight Gain Guidelines3

    Recommendation by Prepregnancy BMITotal Weight Gain (Kg)Total Weight Gain (lbs)2nd and 3rd Trimester (lbs/week)2nd and 3rd Trimester (lbs/month)
    Underweight: <18.513 to 1828 to 401 to 1.34 to 6
    Normal: 18.5 to 24.911 to 1625 to 350.8 to 1.04
    Overweight: 25 to 29.97 to 1115 to 250.5 to 0.72
    Obese: ≥305 to 911 to 200.4 to 0.51.5 to 2
    • BMI, body mass index.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Patient Characteristics at Entry to Prenatal Care* (n = 1571)

    VariablePreintervention (n = 795)Postintervention (n = 776)P Value
    Maternal age (years)27.5 (5.6)28.0 (5.6).92†
    Race<.01‡
     Asian6.3 (50)6.1 (47)
     African American19.3 (153)19.2 (148)
     Hispanic26.2 (208)40.3 (311)
     Native American0.9 (7)1.4 (11)
     Caucasian47.4 (377)32.9 (254)
    Pre-BMI.06‡
     <18.5 (Underweight)4.8 (38)3.2 (25)
     18.5 to 24.9 (Normal)40.0 (318)36.6 (283)
     25.0 to 29.9 (Overweight)28.2 (224)27.7 (214)
     >30.0 (Obese)27.0 (215)32.5 (252)
    Insurance.86‡
     Commercial29.3 (230)28.5 (221)
     Medicaid69.3 (544)69.9 (542)
     Self-pay1.4 (11)1.7 (13)
    Parity.74‡
     035.4 (281)34.7 (270)
     >164.6 (514)65.3 (506)
    • BMI, body mass index.

    • ↵* Values are presented as % (N) for categorical and mean (SD) for continuous.

    • ↵† From Student’s t test.

    • ↵‡ From Pearson’s χ2 test of proportions.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Primary and Secondary Outcomes by Group*

    VariablePre-Intervention (n = 795)Post-Intervention (n = 776)p-Value
    IOM counseling<0.01‡
     No89.9 (715)37.2 (289)
     Yes10.1 (80)62.8 (487)
    Total weight gain (lb)28.3 (13.9)25.9 (13.7).61†
    IOM weight gain (lb).10‡
     Low22.01 (175)25.77 (200)
     Recommended31.57 (251)32.73 (254)
     High46.42 (369)41.49 (322)
    Gestational age (weeks).13‡
     <374.7 (37)2.8 (22)
     >37 and <4185.7 (681)86.2 (667)
     >419.7 (77)11.0 (85)
    Birthweight (g).68‡
     <25002.6 (21)2.2 (17)
     2500 to 400089.3 (709)90.6 (703)
     >40008.1 (64)7.2 (56)
    Route of delivery.39‡
     Spontaneous vaginal76.9 (611)77.8 (601)
     Assisted vaginal4.8 (38)4.1 (32)
     Primary cesarean11.8 (94)10.0 (77)
     Repeat cesarean6.5 (52)8.1 (63)
    Hypertension.61‡
     No92.2 (733)91.5 (710)
     Yes7.8 (62)8.5 (66)
    Gestational diabetes<.01‡
     No88.5 (530)92.7 (719)
     Yes11.5 (69)§7.3 (57)‖
    Shoulder dystocia.01‡
     No94.4 (607)97.2 (617)
     Yes5.6 (26)2.8 (18)
     Sensitivity analysis, yes¶3.1 (19)2.4 (16).22‡
    • IOM, Institute of Medicine.

    • ↵* Values are presented as % (N) for categorical and mean (SD) for continuous.

    • ↵† From Student’s t test.

    • ↵‡ From Pearson’s χ2 test of proportions.

    • ↵§ Missing values from one site (69/599 = 11.5%).

    • ↵‖ If exclude site missing pre-data, post-intervention gestational Diabetes = 7.6%. No significant difference.

    • ↵¶ Omitting site that changed diagnostic criteria between pre- and postintervention time period.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Multivariate Regression Models for Weight Gain* (n = 1571)

    VariableLow Weight GainHigh Weight Gain
    Intervention group1.20 (0.85–1.69); P = .310.85 (0.63–1.16); P = .10
    IOM Counseling0.83 (0.99–1.04); P = .301.04 (0.76–1.43); P = .79
    Site
     1 UICReferenceReference
     2 StMary’s1.02 (0.64–1.62); P = .460.76 (0.50–1.17); P = .12
     3 Hinsdale0.68 (0.42–1.10); P = .121.06 (0.70–1.59); P = .60
     4 Adv Christ1.06 (0.66–1.70); P = .311.07 (0.71–1.61); P = .57
     5 Resurrection0.74 (0.40–1.37); P = .430.69 (0.40–1.19); P = .09
     6 N Dakota0.86 (0.42–1.78); P = .901.12 (0.63–2.01); P = .56
     7 Rockford, IL0.96 (0.44–2.09); P = .811.30 (0.69–2.44); P = .25
    Race
     CaucasianReferenceReference
     Asian1.01 (0.55–1.83); P = .150.55 (0.31–0.97); P = .04
     African American0.96 (0.62–1.48); P = .050.72 (0.49-1.05); P = .16
     Hispanic0.94 (0.64–1.37); P = .040.72 (0.52–1.02); P = .15
     Native American11.42 (1.40 to 93.30); P = .024.03 (0.48–34.17); P = .12
    Pre-BMI
     <18.5 (Underweight)0.98 (0.54–1.80); P = .760.35 (0.16–0.74); P < .01
     18.5 to 24.9 (Normal)ReferenceReference
     25.0 to 29.9 (Overweight)0.64 (0.44–0.94); P = .022.16 (1.60–2.93); P < .01
     >30.0 (Obese)1.11 (0.78–1.57); P = .172.25 (1.64–3.08); P < .01
    Insurance
     CommercialReferenceReference
     Medicaid1.52 (1.07–2.16); P = .861.25 (0.92–1.69); P = .88
     Self-pay2.58 (0.81–8.27); P = .211.42 (0.47–4.27); P = .67
    Parity1.02 (0.73–1.43); P = .910.54 (0.41–0.73); P < .01
    Maternal age1.01 (0.98–1.03); P = .600.98 (0.96–1.01); P = .16
    • IOM, Institute of Medicine; BMI, body mass index; UIC, University of Illinois, Chicago.

    • ↵* Values are presented as odds ratio (95% CI).

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Multivariate Regression Models for Secondary Outcomes* (n = 1571)

    VariableGestational DiabetesShoulder Dystocia
    Intervention group0.54 (0.32–0.91); P = .020.65 (0.33–1.30); P = .22
    IOM Counseling0.94 (0.56–1.58); P = .810.31 (0.12-0.78); P = .01
    Site
     1 UICReferenceReference
     2 StMary’s1.13 (0.51–2.52); P = .770.94 (0.35–2.56); P = .35
     3 Hinsdale1.72 (0.77–3.85); P = .111.86 (0.77–4.51); P < .01
     4 Adv Christ1.12 (0.49–2.57); P = .740.49 (0.16–1.55); P = .54
     5 Resurrection0.61 (0.20–1.87); P = .080.19 (0.02–1.59); P = .16
     6 N Dakota2.67 (1.06–6.69); P < .010.50 (0.12-2.15); P = .67
     7 Rockford, IL1.10 (0.35–3.47); P = .800.57 (0.13-2.45); P = .82
    Race
     CaucasianReferenceReference
     Asian4.50 (1.99–10.20); P < .010.26 (0.03–1.99); P = .98
     African American0.65 (0.30–1.39); P = .020.77 (0.32–1.84); P = .96
     Hispanic2.10 (1.25–3.54); P = .110.71 (0.33-1.56); P = .96
     Native American0.94 (0.19-4.68); P = .53<0.01 (<0.01–>999.99); P = .97
    Pre-BMI
     <18.5 (Underweight)0.53 (0.11–2.46); P = .110.88 (0.19–4.04); P = .68
     18.5 to 24.9 (Normal)ReferenceReference
     25.0 to 29.9 (Overweight)1.84 (1.08–3.16); P = .201.38 (0.69–2.77); P = .45
     >30.0 (Obese)3.32 (1.98–5.57); P < .011.26 (0.59–2.69); P = .68
    Insurance
     CommercialReferenceReference
     Medicaid0.51 (0.11–2.46); P = .761.44 (0.66–3.15); P = .32
     Self-pay0.34 (0.07–1.67); P = .365.50 (0.97–31.11); P = .07
    Parity1.16 (0.70–1.91); P = .571.30 (0.64–2.64); P = .47
    Maternal age1.07 (1.03–1.11); P < .010.98 (0.92–1.04); P = .45
    • IOM, Institute of Medicine; BMI, body mass index; UIC, University of Illinois, Chicago.

    • ↵* Values are presented as odds ratio (95% CI).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family  Medicine: 33 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 33, Issue 2
March/April 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lowering Gestational Diabetes Risk by Prenatal Weight Gain Counseling
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Lowering Gestational Diabetes Risk by Prenatal Weight Gain Counseling
Evelyn M. Figueroa, Kara Nitti, Stephen M. Sladek
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2020, 33 (2) 189-197; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190203

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Lowering Gestational Diabetes Risk by Prenatal Weight Gain Counseling
Evelyn M. Figueroa, Kara Nitti, Stephen M. Sladek
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2020, 33 (2) 189-197; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190203
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix 1: Provider & Patient Handouts
    • Appendix 2
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Many Family Medicine Successful Interventions and Clinical Reviews for Common Illnesses
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Counseling
  • Gestational Diabetes
  • Gestational Weight Gain
  • Historically Controlled Study
  • Hypertension
  • Logistic Models
  • Obstetrics
  • Pregnancy Complications

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire