Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Patient-Centered Research Priorities: A Mixed-Methods Approach from the Colorado Children's Outcomes Network (COCONet)

Sarah E. Brewer, Natalie M. Crump and Sean T. O'Leary
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2019, 32 (5) 674-684; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.05.190028
Sarah E. Brewer
From the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (SEB, STO); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (SEB); Health and Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado–Denver, Denver, CO (SEB); Colorado Children's Outcomes Network (COCONet) Network Advisory Board, Aurora, CO (NMC); Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (STO).
MPA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalie M. Crump
From the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (SEB, STO); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (SEB); Health and Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado–Denver, Denver, CO (SEB); Colorado Children's Outcomes Network (COCONet) Network Advisory Board, Aurora, CO (NMC); Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (STO).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean T. O'Leary
From the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (SEB, STO); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (SEB); Health and Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado–Denver, Denver, CO (SEB); Colorado Children's Outcomes Network (COCONet) Network Advisory Board, Aurora, CO (NMC); Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (STO).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Israel BA,
    2. Coombe CM,
    3. Cheezum RR,
    4. et al
    . Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities. Am J Public Health 2010;100:2094–2102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Woolf SH,
    2. Zimmerman E,
    3. Haley A,
    4. Krist AH
    . Authentic engagement of patients and communities can transform research, practice, and policy. Health affairs (Project Hope) 2016;35:590–594.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Institute of Medicine: Committee on Educating Public Health Professionals for the 21st Century. Who will keep the public healthy? Educating public health professionals for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Israel BA,
    2. Parker EA,
    3. Rowe Z,
    4. et al
    . Community-based participatory research: lessons learned from the Centers for Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:1463–1471.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Blumenthal DS,
    2. DiClemente RJ
    . Community-based participatory health research: Issues, methods, and translation to practice. Springer Publishing Company; 2013.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Minkler M
    . Community-based research partnerships: challenges and opportunities. J Urban Health 2005;82(2 Suppl 2):ii3–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Metzler MM,
    2. Higgins DL,
    3. Beeker CG,
    4. et al
    . Addressing urban health in Detroit, New York City, and Seattle through community-based participatory research partnerships. Am J Public Health 2003;93:803–811.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Israel BA,
    2. Lichtenstein R,
    3. Lantz P,
    4. et al
    . The Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center: development, implementation, and evaluation. J Public Health Manag Pract 2001;7:1–19.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Wallerstein NB,
    2. Duran B
    . Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promot Pract 2006;7:312–323.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Green LA,
    2. Hickner J
    . A short history of primary care practice-based research networks: from concept to essential research laboratories. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:1–10.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Gardner W,
    2. Kelleher KJ,
    3. Wasserman R,
    4. et al
    . Primary care treatment of pediatric psychosocial problems: A study from pediatric research in office settings and ambulatory sentinel practice network. Pediatrics 2000;106(4):E44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    A study of headache in North American primary care. Report from the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network. J R Coll Gen Pract 1987;37:400–403.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Froom J,
    2. Culpepper L,
    3. Green LA,
    4. et al
    . A cross-national study of acute otitis media: risk factors, severity, and treatment at initial visit. Report from the International Primary Care Network (IPCN) and the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network (ASPN). J Am Board Fam Pract 2001;14:406–417.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  14. 14.↵
    1. Westfall J,
    2. Mold J,
    3. Fagnan L
    . Practice-based research—“Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007;297:403–406.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Fagnan LJ,
    3. Handley M,
    4. et al
    . Practice-based research is community engagement. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:423–427.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Fagnan LJ,
    2. Davis M,
    3. Deyo RA,
    4. Werner JJ,
    5. Stange KC
    . Linking practice-based research networks and Clinical and Translational Science Awards: new opportunities for community engagement by academic health centers. Acad Med 2010;85:476–483.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Macaulay AC,
    2. Nutting PA
    . Moving the frontiers forward: incorporating community-based participatory research into practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2006;4:4–7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Felzien M,
    2. Zittleman L,
    3. Westfall JM
    . Farming, ranching, research: patient engagement on the high plains. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31:3–4.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Tapp H,
    2. Dulin M
    . The science of primary health-care improvement: potential and use of community-based participatory research by practice-based research networks for translation of research into practice. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2010;235:290–299.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Creswell JW,
    2. Plano Clark VL,
    3. Gutmann ML,
    4. Hanson WE
    . Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research 2003;209–240.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Fetters MD,
    2. Curry LA,
    3. Creswell JW
    . Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Serv Res 2013;48(6pt2):2134–2156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Gentles SJ,
    2. Charles C,
    3. Ploeg J,
    4. McKibbon K
    . Sampling in qualitative research: insights from an overview of the methods literature. Qual Rep 2015;20:1772–1789.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Atkinson R,
    2. Flint J
    . Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies. Social Res Update 2001;33:1–4.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Dillman DA,
    2. Smyth JD,
    3. Christian LM
    . Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009.
  25. 25.↵
    1. Creswell JW,
    2. Poth CN
    . Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2017.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Siltanen J,
    2. Willis A,
    3. Scobie W
    . Separately together: Working reflexively as a team. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2008;11:45–61.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Finlay L,
    2. Gough B
    . Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
  28. 28.↵
    The James Lind Alliance. James Lind Alliance. 2019. Available from: http://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/. Accessed May 1, 2019.
  29. 29.↵
    1. Brewer SE,
    2. O'Leary ST
    . Engaging parents and stakeholders in patient-centered pediatric research and research agenda setting: a guide for practice-based research networks. 2017. Available from: http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/medicalschool/programs/ACCORDS/sharedresources/education/Documents/COCONet%20link%201_4.18.18.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2019.
  30. 30.↵
    JLA Guide Book. James Lind Alliance. 2018. Available from: http://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/jla-guidebook/. Accessed May 1, 2019.
  31. 31.↵
    1. Riva JJ,
    2. Malik KM,
    3. Burnie SJ,
    4. Endicott AR,
    5. Busse JW
    . What is your research question? An introduction to the PICOT format for clinicians. J Can Chiropr Assoc. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2012;56:167–171.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Campbell C,
    2. Jovchelovitch S
    . Health, community and development: Towards a social psychology of participation. J Commun Appl Soc Psychol 2000;255–270.
  33. 33.↵
    1. Viswanathan M,
    2. Ammerman A,
    3. Eng E,
    4. et al
    . Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 2004;(99):1–8.
  34. 34.↵
    Healthy People 2020. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/healthy_people/hp2020.htm. Accessed May 1, 2019.
  35. 35.↵
    American Academy of Pediatrics. American Academy of Pediatrics Agenda for Children 2017–2018. Available from: https://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-facts/AAP-Agenda-for-Children-Strategic-Plan/Pages/AAP-Agenda-for-Children-Strategic-Plan.aspx. Accessed January 17, 2019.
  36. 36.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. VanVorst RF,
    3. Main DS,
    4. Herbert C
    . Community-based participatory research in practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2006;4:8–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Matoff-Stepp S,
    2. Applebaum B,
    3. Pooler J,
    4. Kavanagh E
    . Women as health care decision-makers: implications for health care coverage in the United States. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2014;25:1507–1513.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 32 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 32, Issue 5
September-October 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient-Centered Research Priorities: A Mixed-Methods Approach from the Colorado Children's Outcomes Network (COCONet)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Patient-Centered Research Priorities: A Mixed-Methods Approach from the Colorado Children's Outcomes Network (COCONet)
Sarah E. Brewer, Natalie M. Crump, Sean T. O'Leary
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2019, 32 (5) 674-684; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.05.190028

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patient-Centered Research Priorities: A Mixed-Methods Approach from the Colorado Children's Outcomes Network (COCONet)
Sarah E. Brewer, Natalie M. Crump, Sean T. O'Leary
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2019, 32 (5) 674-684; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.05.190028
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Engaging practices and communities in the development of interventions to promote HPV vaccine uptake: a protocol for implementing Boot Camp Translation in the private practice setting
  • Practice-Based Research Today: A Changing Primary Care Landscape Requires Changes in Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) Research
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Child Health
  • Colorado
  • Focus Groups
  • Parents
  • Patient Care
  • Patient Outcome Assessment
  • Practice-based Research
  • Primary Health Care
  • Qualitative Research
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire