Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Patient-Centered Research Priorities: A Mixed-Methods Approach from the Colorado Children's Outcomes Network (COCONet)

Sarah E. Brewer, Natalie M. Crump and Sean T. O'Leary
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2019, 32 (5) 674-684; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.05.190028
Sarah E. Brewer
From the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (SEB, STO); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (SEB); Health and Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado–Denver, Denver, CO (SEB); Colorado Children's Outcomes Network (COCONet) Network Advisory Board, Aurora, CO (NMC); Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (STO).
MPA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalie M. Crump
From the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (SEB, STO); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (SEB); Health and Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado–Denver, Denver, CO (SEB); Colorado Children's Outcomes Network (COCONet) Network Advisory Board, Aurora, CO (NMC); Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (STO).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean T. O'Leary
From the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (SEB, STO); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (SEB); Health and Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado–Denver, Denver, CO (SEB); Colorado Children's Outcomes Network (COCONet) Network Advisory Board, Aurora, CO (NMC); Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (STO).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Overview of study design and prioritization process.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographic Characteristics of Stakeholders Interviewed about Pediatric Health Research Priorities in the COCONet, 2015 to 2016 (N = 61)

    Total Sample, % (n)Stakeholders, % (n)Parents, % (n)Teens, % (n)
    Stakeholder group, n only*
        Primary group123712
        Secondary group490
    Special considerations
        Healthy54 (33)33 (4)51 (19)83 (10)
        Special health needs28 (17)17 (2)41 (15)0 (0)
        Spanish speaking25 (15)0 (0)41 (15)0 (0)
        Low literacy5 (3)0 (0)3 (1)17 (2)
    Professional type†
        Policymaker8 (5)42 (5)0 (0)0 (0)
        Advocate13 (8)33 (4)11 (4)0 (0)
        Payer2 (1)8 (1)0 (0)0 (0)
        Physician13 (8)58 (7)3 (1)0 (0)
    Region
        Denver Metro54 (33)100 (12)49 (18)24 (3)
        Other Front Range15 (9)0 (0)19 (7)17 (2)
        Western Slope8 (5)0 (0)14 (5)0 (0)
        Eastern Plains3 (2)0 (0)5 (2)0 (0)
        Central Mountains2 (1)0 (0)3 (1)0 (0)
        San Luis Valley and Southwest2 (1)0 (0)3 (1)0 (0)
    Race/ethnicity
        White, non-Hispanic51 (31)75 (9)49 (18)33 (4)
        Hispanic34 (21)8 (1)49 (18)17 (2)
        Black13 (8)8 (1)3 (1)50 (6)
        Other2 (1)0 (0)0 (0)8 (1)
    Gender
        Male13 (8)17 (2)3 (1)42 (5)
        Female87 (53)83 (10)97 (36)58 (7)
    Agreed to survey followup69 (42)100 (12)51 (19)92 (11)
    • ↵* Stakeholder group refers to the roles in which the interviewee was recruited to the project and participated in the study. Primary are the roles for which they were initially interviewed. Secondary roles are those revealed later in the process (for example a policymaker who revealed their parenting status during an interview) and potentially relevant to the research. Subsequent rows are calculated on the primary stakeholder group.

    • ↵† Professional type was an “initial categorization” of non-parent professionals that was later documented for parents in relevant professional roles.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Illustrative Quotes from COCONet Stakeholder Interviews on Priority Issues in Pediatric Health

    Topic AreaSubtopicQuote
    Pediatric health issuesImmunization refusals“Your decision about immunization has ripple impacts on other children.” –Parent
    Mental health“There is a gigantic void and I think we don't address mental health.”–Parent
    “Like I said earlier, I have a friend with really bad social anxiety and it's bad enough to the point where if they're around more than three or four people that they know, they disappear to themselves. They don't speak. I just feel like other health topics than ADD or depression should be touched on in schools.” - Adolescent
    Obesity, food, and nutrition“How can we get kids involved, get them healthy, before obesity becomes an issue?” - Parent
    Sexual health“…getting [data] into the hands of parents to ensure age appropriate sexual health education is going on.”–Provider
    “… there should be more education for everyone about birth control 'cause I don't know a lot of guys that know things about birth control.”–Adolescent
    Drug and substance use/abuse“… since the legalization of marijuana anecdotally it seems like there is easier access to pot by kids”–Provider
    “You always hear, “Don't do drugs. Don't do it.” But you never hear, “This is why you don't want to do it.” […] they should explain to you why.”–Adolescent
    Health care systemCare coordination“I think it's always a struggle in a complex system like we've built.”–Child Health Advocate
    Patient-provider relationships“It's just really important to us to have communication going between parents and the doctor.”–Parent
    “every time I went to the doctor, it was a different doctor, so I never really was able to get a connection with my doctor,”–Adolescent
    Provider-to-provider communication“There needs to be more collaboration.”–Provider
    Access/availability of care“There's not a pediatric provider within the county.”–Parent
    “[There should be] health care and all those kinds of things accessible to kids who don't have the kind of parents who can afford it, free or at school or something or based on donations.”–Adolescent
    Early childhood education“It goes back to parent education about developmental milestones.”–Provider
    Parent education on child health“Parenting doesn't come with a guidebook,' but maybe it could, a little bit more.”–Parent
    Emerging research questionsHow can parents be better advocates for their child's health in the health care setting? (Or teens for their own health?)“How are they [parents] supposed to be effective advocates for their kid?”–Parent
    How can we improve the doctor-patient relationship in pediatric settings? Does this improve health outcomes?
    • Data source: Interview transcripts from COCONet stakeholder interviews collected from 2015 to 2016. ADD, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    “Top 6” Stakeholder-Identified Research Issues Chosen for Rating Survey

    1. Access to and availability of care including mental health
    2. Coordination of care with and among specialists and primary care providers
    3. Immunization refusal and Colorado's low rates
    4. Pediatric Mental Health—Coordination, communication and/or integration with primary care providers
    5. Models for improving the doctor-patient relationship
    6. Training parents (or teens) as advocates for care with goal of improved health outcomes
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Sample Characteristics and Issue Rankings

    Rating of Overall Importance in Colorado (10-Point Scale)Rating of Research Importance in Colorado (10-Point Scale)No. of Respondents Interested in Working Group
    MeanMinMaxMeanMinMax
    Access to and availability of care including mental health8.511.90107.460.601020
    Coordination of care with and among specialists and primary care providers8.044.00107.350.401017
    Immunization refusal and Colorado's low rates8.401.40107.270.201017
    Pediatric Mental Health—Coordination, communication and/or integration with primary care providers9.246.00108.590.0.101034
    Models for improving the doctor-patient relationship7.581.80106.500.201014
    Training parents (or teens) as advocates for care with goal of improved health outcomes7.932.80107.260.201024
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 32 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 32, Issue 5
September-October 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient-Centered Research Priorities: A Mixed-Methods Approach from the Colorado Children's Outcomes Network (COCONet)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Patient-Centered Research Priorities: A Mixed-Methods Approach from the Colorado Children's Outcomes Network (COCONet)
Sarah E. Brewer, Natalie M. Crump, Sean T. O'Leary
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2019, 32 (5) 674-684; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.05.190028

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patient-Centered Research Priorities: A Mixed-Methods Approach from the Colorado Children's Outcomes Network (COCONet)
Sarah E. Brewer, Natalie M. Crump, Sean T. O'Leary
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2019, 32 (5) 674-684; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.05.190028
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Engaging practices and communities in the development of interventions to promote HPV vaccine uptake: a protocol for implementing Boot Camp Translation in the private practice setting
  • Practice-Based Research Today: A Changing Primary Care Landscape Requires Changes in Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) Research
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Child Health
  • Colorado
  • Focus Groups
  • Parents
  • Patient Care
  • Patient Outcome Assessment
  • Practice-based Research
  • Primary Health Care
  • Qualitative Research
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire