Strategies for Developing and Sustaining Patient and Community Advisory Groups: Lessons from the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP) Consortium of Practice-Based Research Networks

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Westfall JM,
   2. Fagnan LJ,
   3. Handley M,
   4. et al

   . Practice-based research is community engagement. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:423–427.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Balazs CL,
   2. Morello-Frosch R

   . The three R's: how community based participatory research strengthens the rigor, relevance and reach of science. Environ Justice 2013;6(1).
3. 3.↵
   1. Balint E

   . The possibilities of patient-centered medicine. J R Coll Gen Pract 1969;17:269–276.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Saha S,
   2. Beach MC,
   3. Cooper LA

   . Patient centeredness, cultural competence and healthcare quality. J Natl Med Assoc 2008;100:1275–1285.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Wallerstein N,
   2. Duran B

   . Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health 2010;100(Suppl 1):S40–S46.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Schmittdiel JA,
   2. Grumbach K,
   3. Selby JV

   . System-based participatory research in health care: an approach for sustainable translational research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med 2010;8:256–259.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Hahn DL,
   2. Hoffmann AE,
   3. Felzien M,
   4. LeMaster JW,
   5. Xu J,
   6. Fagnan LJ

   . Tokenism in patient engagement. Fam Pract 2017;34:290–295.

   OpenUrl
8. 8.↵
   IAP2. IAP2 spectrum of public participation. 2018. Available from: https://www.iap2.org/page/pillars. Accessed May 30, 2019.
9. 9.↵
   1. Westfall JM,
   2. VanVorst RF,
   3. Main DS,
   4. Herbert C

   . Community-based participatory research in practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2006;4:8–14.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Macaulay AC,
    2. Nutting PA

    . Moving the frontiers forward: incorporating community-based participatory research into practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2006;4:4–7.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Tapp H,
    2. Dulin M

    . The science of primary health-care improvement: potential and use of community-based participatory research by practice-based research networks for translation of research into practice. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2010;235:290–299.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    High Plains Research Network. High Plains Research Network YouTube Channel. 2019. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBofdYsXJDLdpLY59S9SabQ. Accessed January 5, 2019.
13. 13.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Van Vorst RF,
    3. McGloin J,
    4. Selker HP

    . Triage and diagnosis of chest pain in rural hospitals: implementation of the ACI-TIPI in the High Plains Research Network. Ann Fam Med 2006;4:153–158.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Hicks PC,
    2. Westfall JM,
    3. Van Vorst RF,
    4. et al

    . Action or inaction? Decision making in patients with diabetes and elevated blood pressure in primary care. Diabetes care 2006;29:2580–2585.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Felzien M,
    2. Zittleman L,
    3. Westfall JM

    . Farming, ranching, research: patient engagement on the High Plains. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31:3–4.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Ingram B,
    3. Navarro D,
    4. et al

    . Engaging communities in education and research: PBRNs, AHEC, and CTSA. Clin Transl Sci 2012;5:250–258.

    OpenUrlPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Zittleman L,
    3. Felzien M,
    4. Ringel M,
    5. Lakin A,
    6. Nease D

    . Institutional review board training when patients and community members are engaged as researchers. Fam Pract 2017;34:301–304.

    OpenUrl
18. 18.↵
    1. Sand J,
    2. Felzien M,
    3. Haeme R,
    4. Tapp H,
    5. Derkowski D,
    6. Westfall JM

    . The North American Primary Care Research Group's Patient and Clinician Engagement Program (PaCE): Demystifying patient engagement through a dyad model. Fam Pract 2017;34:285–289.

    OpenUrl
19. 19.↵
    1. Norman N,
    2. Cowart S,
    3. Felzien M,
    4. et al

    . Testing to prevent colon cancer: how rural community members took on a community-based intervention. Ann Fam Med 2013;11:568–570.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    The High Plains Research Network Community Advisory Council. Supplemental Case Report. Community involvement in a practice based research network. 2006. Available from: http://www.annfammed.org/content/suppl/2006/02/08/4.1.8.DC1/Westfall_appendix_corr.new.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2019.
21. 21.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Zittleman L,
    3. Felzien M,
    4. et al

    . Reinventing the wheel of medical evidence: how the boot camp translation process is making gains. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016;35:613–618.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Van Vorst RF,
    2. Araya-Guerra R,
    3. Felzien M,
    4. et al

    . Rural community members' perceptions of harm from medical mistakes: a High Plains Research Network (HPRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20:135–143.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Norman N,
    2. Bennett C,
    3. Cowart S,
    4. et al

    . Boot camp translation: a method for building a community of solution. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26:254–263.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Zittleman L

    . Quandaries in authorship. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2018;12:117–120.

    OpenUrl
25. 25.↵
    1. Allison C,
    2. Zittleman L,
    3. Ringel M,
    4. et al

    . Translating the medical home into patient-centred language. London J Prim Care (Abingdon) 2014;6:124–130.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Parnes B,
    2. Niebauer L,
    3. Holcomb S,
    4. et al

    . Provider deferred decisions on hemoglobin A1c results: a report from the Colorado Research Network (CaReNet) and the High Plains Research Network (HPRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:20–23.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Parnes BL,
    2. Main DS,
    3. Dickinson LM,
    4. et al

    . Clinical decisions regarding HbA1c results in primary care: A report from CaReNet and HPRN. Diabetes Care 2004;27:13–16.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Goodman LA

    . Snowball sampling. Ann Math Statist 1961;32:148–170.

    OpenUrl
29. 29.↵
    1. Kwan BM,
    2. Jortberg B,
    3. Warman MK,
    4. et al

    . Stakeholder engagement in diabetes self-management: patient preference for peer support and other insights. Fam Pract 2017;34:358–363.

    OpenUrl
30. 30.↵
    Managing Diabetes. 2017. Available from: https://connectiontohealth.org/health-tips/colorado/managing-diabetes. Accessed January 25, 2019.
31. 31.↵
    Testing the appreciative inquiry and boot camp translation methods for identifying and sharing local solutions to healthcare issues. 2019. Available from:https://www.pcori.org/research-results/2013/testing-appreciative-inquiry-and-boot-camp-translation-methods-identifying-and. Accessed January 25, 2019.
32. 32.↵
    1. Norman N,
    2. Wolff C,
    3. Borcher R,
    4. Felzien M,
    5. Westfall J

    . NAPCRG's Patient and Clinician Engagement (PaCE) project: engaging patients and providers in patient-centered outcomes research. Available from: https://www.napcrg.org/media/1409/plenaryii.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2019.
33. 33.↵
    (NAPCRG) NAPCRG. 2018 NAPCRG Practice-based Research Network Conference Conference Program. 2018. Available from: https://www.napcrg.org/media/1487/18-pbrn-program.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2019.
34. 34.↵
    1. Brewer S,
    2. O'Leary S

    . Engaging parents and stakeholders in patient-centered pediatric research and research agenda setting. A guide for practice-based research networks. 2017. Available from: http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/medicalschool/programs/ACCORDS/sharedresources/education/Documents/COCONet%20link%201_4.18.18.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2019.
35. 35.↵
    1. Fisher M,
    2. Brewer S,
    3. Holtrop JS,
    4. et al

    . Returning to the original vision of practice-based research networks: setting research priorities from the ground up. J Am Board Fam Med [in press].
36. 36.↵
    1. Simon C,
    2. Mosavel M

    . Community members as recruiters of human subjects: ethical considerations. Am J Bioeth 2010;10:3–11.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. 37.↵
    1. Svara JH,
    2. Denhardt J

    . The connected community: local governments as partners in citizen engagement and community building. 2010. Available from: https://icma.org/sites/default/files/301763_CommunityConnectionsWhitePaper.pdf. Accessed January 25, 2019.
38. 38.↵
    1. D'Alonzo KT

    . Getting started in CBPR: lessons in building community partnerships for new researchers. Nurs Inq 2010;17:282–288.

    OpenUrlPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. DePrince AP

    . Public good and the nexus of social justice, feminism, and Rock ‘n’ Roll. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 2009;16.
40. 40.↵
    1. Redding S,
    2. Murphy M,
    3. Sheley P

    . Handbook on family and community engagement. 2011. Available from: http://www.schoolcommunitynetwork.org/downloads/FACEHandbook.pdf.
41. 41.↵
    United States. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Bethesda, MD: Washington, DC: The Commission; for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office; 1978.
42. 42.↵
    1. Nease DE Jr.,
    2. Burton D,
    3. Cutrona SL,
    4. et al

    . “Our lab is the community”: defining essential supporting infrastructure in engagement research. J Clin Transl Sci 2018;2:228–233.

    OpenUrl
43. 43.↵
    1. Dolor RJ,
    2. Campbell-Voytal K,
    3. Daly J,
    4. et al

    . Practice-Based Research Network Research Good Practices (PRGPs): summary of recommendations. J Clin Transl Sci 2015;8:638–646.

    OpenUrl
44. 44.↵
    Institute for Patient- and Family-Centered Care. Creating opportunities for pfas to serve on research teams. Available from: http://www.ipfcc.org/bestpractices/sustainable-partnerships/engaging/creating-opportunities.html. Accessed May 30, 2019.