Implementing Risk Stratification in Primary Care: Challenges and Strategies

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Crane SJ,
   2. Tung EE,
   3. Hanson GJ,
   4. et al

   . Use of an electronic administrative database to identify older community dwelling adults at high-risk for hospitalization or emergency department visits: the Elders Risk Assessment Index. BMC Health Serv Res 2010:10:338.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Drennan V,
   2. Iliffe S,
   3. Tai SS,
   4. et al

   . Can primary care identify an ‘at risk’ group in the older population. Br J Comm Nurs 2007;12:142–8.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   1. Rubenstein LZ,
   2. Alessi CA,
   3. Josephson KR,
   4. et al

   . A randomized trial of a screening, case finding, and referral system for older veterans in primary care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:166–74.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Schraeder C,
   2. Britt T,
   3. Shelton P

   . Integrated risk assessment and feedback reporting for clinical decision making in a Medicare Risk plan. J Ambul Care Manage 2000;23:40–7.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Jiang HJ,
   2. Weiss AJ,
   3. Barrett ML,
   4. et al

   . Characteristics of hospital stays for super-utilizers by payer, 2012: Statistical Brief #190. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) statistical briefs. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006.
6. 6.↵
   U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Multiple chronic conditions: A strategic framework—Optimum health and quality of life for individuals with multiple chronic conditions. DHHS; Dec. 2010.
7. 7.↵
   1. Peikes D,
   2. Ghosh A,
   3. Zutshi A,
   4. et al

   . Evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative: Second annual report. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research; 2016. Available from: https://www.mathematica-mpr.com/our-publications-and-findings/publications/evaluation-of-the-comprehensive-primary-care-initiative-second-annual-report.
8. 8.↵
   1. McConnell KJ

   . Oregon's Medicaid coordinated care organizations. JAMA 2016;315:869–70.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Haas LR,
   2. Takahashi PY,
   3. Shah ND,
   4. et al

   . Risk-stratification methods for identifying patients for care coordination. Am J Manag Care 2013;19:725–32.

   OpenUrlPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Hibbard JH,
    2. Greene J,
    3. Sacks RM,
    4. et al

    . Improving population health management strategies: Identifying patients who are more likely to be users of avoidable costly care and those more likely to develop a new chronic disease. Health Serv Res 2017;52:1297–1309.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.↵
    1. Leininger LJ,
    2. Friedsam D,
    3. Voskuil K,
    4. et al

    . Predicting high-need cases among new Medicaid enrollees. Am J Manag Care 2014;20(9):e399–e407.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Cohen DJ,
    2. Dorr DA,
    3. Knierim K,
    4. et al

    . Primary care practices' abilities and challenges in using electronic health record data for quality improvement. Health affairs (Project Hope) 2018;37:635–43.

    OpenUrl
13. 13.↵
    1. Behkami NA,
    2. Dorr DA,
    3. Morrice S

    . A business case for HIT adoption: Effects of “meaningful use” EHR financial incentives on clinic revenue. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;160(Pt 1):779–783.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Friedberg MW,
    2. Schneider EC,
    3. Rosenthal MB,
    4. et al

    . Association between participation in a multipayer medical home intervention and changes in quality, utilization, and costs of care. JAMA 2014;311:815–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Nutting PA,
    2. Miller WL,
    3. Crabtree BF,
    4. et al

    . Initial lessons from the first national demonstration project on practice transformation to a patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med 2009;7:254–60.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Winkelman R,
    2. Damler R

    . Risk adjustment in state Medicaid programs. Health Watch 2008;57:14–34.

    OpenUrl
17. 17.↵
    1. Ross RL,
    2. Sachdeva B,
    3. Wagner J,
    4. et al

    . Perceptions of risk stratification workflows in primary care. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 2017;5(4).
18. 18.↵
    1. Holden RJ,
    2. Carayon P,
    3. Gurses AP,
    4. et al

    . SEIPS 2.0: A human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics 2013;56:1669–86.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Damschroder LJ,
    2. Aron DC,
    3. Keith RE,
    4. et al

    . Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009;IS 4:50.
20. 20.↵
    Atlas.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH [computer program]. Version 7.0. Berlin, Germany.
21. 21.↵
    1. Crabtree BF,
    2. Miller EL

    1. Borkan J

    . Immersion/crystallization. In: Crabtree BF, Miller EL, eds. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.
22. 22.↵
    American Academy of Family Physicians. Risk-stratified care management. 2014. Available from: https://nf.aafp.org/Shop/practice-transformation/risk-stratified-care-mgmt-rubric. Accessed November 2, 2018.
23. 23.↵
    1. Hong CS,
    2. Siegel AL,
    3. Ferris TG

    . Caring for high-need, high-cost patients: What makes for a successful care management program? Issue brief (Commonwealth Fund) 2014;19:1–19.

    OpenUrlPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Reddy A,
    2. Sessums L,
    3. Gupta R,
    4. et al

    . Risk stratification methods and provision of care management services in comprehensive primary care initiative practices. Ann Fam Med 2017;15:451–4.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Blumenthal D,
    2. Abrams MK

    . Tailoring complex care management for high-need, high-cost patients. JAMA 2016;316:1657–8.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed