Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Assessment of the Generalizability of an eConsult Service through Implementation in a New Health Region

Clare Liddy, Isabella Moroz, Ariana Mihan and Erin Keely
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2019, 32 (2) 146-157; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180169
Clare Liddy
From C.T. Lamont Primary Healthcare Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (CL, IM, AM); Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (CL); Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (EK); Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (EK).
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabella Moroz
From C.T. Lamont Primary Healthcare Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (CL, IM, AM); Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (CL); Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (EK); Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (EK).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ariana Mihan
From C.T. Lamont Primary Healthcare Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (CL, IM, AM); Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (CL); Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (EK); Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (EK).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erin Keely
From C.T. Lamont Primary Healthcare Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (CL, IM, AM); Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (CL); Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (EK); Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (EK).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    Canadian Institute for Health Information. How Canada compares: results from The Commonwealth Fund's 2016 international health policy survey of adults in 11 countries. Available from: https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/text-alternative-version-2016-cmwf-en-web.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed May 4, 2018.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Schneider EC,
    2. Sarnak DO,
    3. Squires D,
    4. Shah A,
    5. Doty MM
    . Mirror, mirror 2017: international comparison reflects flaws and opportunities for better U.S. health care. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2017.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Cook NL,
    2. Hicks LS,
    3. O'Malley AJ,
    4. Keegan T,
    5. Guadagnoli E,
    6. Landon BE
    . Access to specialty care and medical services in community health centers. Health Aff 2007;26:1459–68.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Decker SL
    . In 2011 nearly one-third of physicians said they would not accept new Medicaid patients, but rising fees may help. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31:1673–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Canadian Institute for Health Information. Health Care in Canada, 2012: a focus on wait times. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2012.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Day B
    . The consequences of waiting. In: Globerman S, editor. Reducing wait times for health care: what Canada can learn from theory and international experience. Vancouver, BC: Fraser Institute; 2013. P. 45–76.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bichel A,
    2. Erfle S,
    3. Wiebe V,
    4. Axelrod D,
    5. Conly J
    . Improving patient access to medical services: preventing the patient from being lost in translation. Healthc Q 2009;13:61–8.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Iedema R
    1. Long D,
    2. Iedema R,
    3. Lee BB
    . Corridor conversations: clinical communication in casual spaces. In: Iedema R, editor. The discourse of hospital communication. Springer; 2007. P. 182–200.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Mehrotra A,
    2. Forrest CB,
    3. Lin CY
    . Dropping the baton: specialty referrals in the United States. Milbank Q 2011;89:39–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. O'Malley AS,
    2. Reschovsky JD
    . Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians: finding common ground. Arch Int Med 2011;171:56–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. O'Donnell CA
    . Variation in GP referral rates: what can we learn from the literature? Fam Pract 2000;17:462–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Chan BT,
    2. Austin PC
    . Patient, physician, and community factors affecting referrals to specialists in Ontario, Canada: a population-based, multi-level modelling approach. Med Care 2003;41:500–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Forrest CB,
    2. Majeed A,
    3. Weiner JP,
    4. Carroll K,
    5. Bindman AB
    . Comparison of specialty referral rates in the United Kingdom and the United States: retrospective cohort analysis. BMJ 2002;325:370–1.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Forrest CB,
    2. Nutting PA,
    3. von SS,
    4. Rohde C,
    5. Starfield B
    . Primary care physician specialty referral decision making: patient, physician, and health care system determinants. Med Decis Making 2006;26:76–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Davies P,
    2. Pool R,
    3. Smelt G
    . What do we actually know about the referral process? Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:752–3.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Guevara JP,
    2. Hsu D,
    3. Forrest CB
    . Performance measures of the specialty referral process: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11:1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kirsh SR,
    2. Ho PM,
    3. Aron DC
    . Providing specialty consultant expertise to primary care: an expanding spectrum of modalities. Mayo Clin Proc 2014;89:1416–1426.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Tuot DS,
    2. Murphy EJ,
    3. McCulloch CE,
    4. Leeds K,
    5. Chan E,
    6. Chen AH
    . Leveraging an electronic referral system to build a medical neighborhood. Healthc (Amst) 2015;3:202–8.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Liddy C,
    2. Drosinis P,
    3. Keely E
    . Electronic consultation systems: worldwide prevalence and their impact on patient care—a systematic review. Fam Pract 2016;33:274–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Vimalananda VG,
    2. Gupte G,
    3. Seraj SM,
    4. Orlander J,
    5. Berlowitz D,
    6. Fincke BG,
    7. et al
    . Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Telemed Telecare 2015;21:323–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Keely E,
    2. Archibald D,
    3. Tuot D,
    4. Lchonan H,
    5. Liddy C
    . Unique educational opportunities arising from electronic consultation services. Acad Med 2017;92:45–51.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Liddy C,
    2. Afkham A,
    3. Drosinis P,
    4. Joschko J,
    5. Keely E
    . Impact and satisfaction with a new eConsult service: a mixed methods study of primary care providers. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:394–403.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Keely E,
    2. Liddy C,
    3. Afkham A
    . Utilization, benefits, and impact of an e-consultation service across diverse specialties and primary care providers. J Telemed E Health 2013;19:733–8.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Joschko J,
    2. Liddy C,
    3. Moroz I,
    4. et al
    . Just a click away: exploring patients' perspectives on receiving care through the Champlain BASE eConsult service. Fam Pract 2018;35:93–8.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    Ontario Physician Human Resources Data Centre. Physicians in Ontario 2015: Report from the Active Physician Registry. Available from: http://www.ophrdc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/2015-Annual-Report-Physicians-in-ONTARIO-PIO.pdf. Published August 2015. Accessed October 4, 2018.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Liddy C,
    2. Moroz I,
    3. Afkham A,
    4. Keely E
    . Evaluating the implementation of the Champlain BASE eConsult Service in a new region of Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional study. Healthc Pol 2017;13:79–95.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Keely E,
    2. Drosinis P,
    3. Afkham A,
    4. Liddy C
    . Perspectives of Champlain BASE specialist physicians: their motivation, experiences and recommendations for providing eConsultations to primary care providers. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015;209:38–45.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Berwick DM
    . The science of improvement. JAMA 2008;299:1182–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Grol R,
    2. Grimshaw J
    . From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003;362:1225–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Rogers E
    . Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press; 2003.
  31. 31.↵
    1. Berwick DM
    . Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA 2003;289:1969–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Berwick DM
    . Lessons from developing nations on improving health care. BMJ 328:1124, 2004.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Bégin HM,
    2. Eggertson L,
    3. Macdonald N
    . A country of perpetual pilot projects. Can Med Assoc J 180:1185, 2009.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Naylor D,
    2. Girard F,
    3. Mintz JM,
    4. et al
    . Unleashing innovation: excellent healthcare for Canada: report of the advisory panel on healthcare innovation. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada; 2015.
  35. 35.↵
    1. Liddy C,
    2. Joschko J,
    3. Keely E
    . Policy innovation is needed to match health care delivery reform: the story of the Champlain BASE eConsult service. Health Reform Observer 2015;3:1–11.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Liddy C,
    2. Moroz I,
    3. Joschko J,
    4. et al
    . Using an integrated knowledge translation (IKT) approach to enable policy change for electronic consultations in Canada. Healthc Policy 2018;14:19–29.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 32 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 32, Issue 2
March-April 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of the Generalizability of an eConsult Service through Implementation in a New Health Region
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Assessment of the Generalizability of an eConsult Service through Implementation in a New Health Region
Clare Liddy, Isabella Moroz, Ariana Mihan, Erin Keely
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2019, 32 (2) 146-157; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180169

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessment of the Generalizability of an eConsult Service through Implementation in a New Health Region
Clare Liddy, Isabella Moroz, Ariana Mihan, Erin Keely
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2019, 32 (2) 146-157; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180169
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix A
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Provincial Spread and Scale of the Ontario eConsult Service: Evaluation of the First 2 Years
  • Multiple Research Methodologies Can Advance the Science of Family Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Canada
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Personal Satisfaction
  • Primary Health Care
  • Referral and Consultation

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire