Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleEvidence-Based Clinical Medicine

The Complex Interpretation and Management of Zika Virus Test Results

Kenneth W. Lin, John D. Kraemer, Rachael Piltch-Loeb and Michael A. Stoto
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2018, 31 (6) 924-930; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.180061
Kenneth W. Lin
From the Department of Family Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC (KWL); Department of Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, Washington (JDK, MAS); New York University College of Global Public Health, New York, NY (RP-L).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John D. Kraemer
From the Department of Family Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC (KWL); Department of Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, Washington (JDK, MAS); New York University College of Global Public Health, New York, NY (RP-L).
JD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachael Piltch-Loeb
From the Department of Family Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC (KWL); Department of Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, Washington (JDK, MAS); New York University College of Global Public Health, New York, NY (RP-L).
MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael A. Stoto
From the Department of Family Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC (KWL); Department of Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, Washington (JDK, MAS); New York University College of Global Public Health, New York, NY (RP-L).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Zika Test Types and Characteristics

    Class of TestSpecific Type of TestEstimated SensitivityEstimated SpecificityRisk of Cross-ReactivityTiming
    Molecular: identify Zika RNAPolymerase chain reaction; transcription-mediated amplificationIncompletely characterized; tests currently authorized for US use have labeled limits of detection across three orders of magnitude. So, while some are extremely sensitive, the least sensitive tests would have failed to detect more than half of positive cases in a recent, large Nicaraguan cohort.Incompletely characterized but expected to be high.Expected to be rare.Only positive while the person is viremic. Window period is normally short, but will cease positive results within a few weeks after symptoms resolve. Mild and nonspecific symptoms for many patients complicate correct timing.
    Serologic: identify antibody against ZikaEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assay37% to 100% in various studies.66% to 100% in various studies. Risk of false positives calls for confirmation by plaque reduction neutralization test under certain situations in CDC algorithm.8% to 40% in various studies, which would reduce effective specificity when cross-reacting viruses are likely present.Most tests identify IgM, which usually develops within a few days after symptoms and decline after about three months (though it sometimes be detected for over a year). A few tests identify IgG, which develops later, although as early as 10 days after symptoms in some cases, but persists for years.
    • CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Zika Virus Screening Protocols (NYC Health + Hospitals, Oct. 2016)

    Criteria for testing
    1. Pregnant women who

      1. traveled while pregnant to an area with Zika virus transmission OR

      2. had unprotected sex (vaginal, anal, or oral) with a partner who spent time in an area with Zika virus transmission

    2. Persons who develop/developed compatible symptoms during or within 4 weeks of travel to an area with Zika virus transmission

    3. Neonates with suspected or confirmed microcephaly or intercranial calcifications born to women who

      1. traveled while pregnant to an area with Zika virus transmission OR

      2. had unprotected sex (vaginal, anal, or oral) with a partner who spent time in an area with Zika virus transmission

    4. Anyone who developed Guillain-Barré syndrome after spending time in an area with active Zika virus transmission

    5. Other special conditions with epidemiological linkage to a confirmed or probably case of Zika virus infection including

      1. recipient of blood, blood products, or organ transplant OR

      2. suspected transfusion-associated transmission, OR

      3. suspected mosquito-borne transmission, OR

      4. any other unusual clinical manifestation or suspected route of exposure

    Laboratory testing, if indicated, can be performed at DOHMH or at a specified commercial laboratory.
        Patient specimens from travel-associated cases of suspected Zika virus infection are sent to the commercial laboratory for testing and do not require the clinician to call DOHMH.
        Clinicians are instructed to call DOHMH for testing in all nontravel-associated cases of suspected Zika virus disease.
    • DOHMH, Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family  Medicine: 31 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 31, Issue 6
November-December 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Complex Interpretation and Management of Zika Virus Test Results
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Complex Interpretation and Management of Zika Virus Test Results
Kenneth W. Lin, John D. Kraemer, Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Michael A. Stoto
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2018, 31 (6) 924-930; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.180061

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Complex Interpretation and Management of Zika Virus Test Results
Kenneth W. Lin, John D. Kraemer, Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Michael A. Stoto
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2018, 31 (6) 924-930; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.180061
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Zika Virus Test Types and Performance
    • Indications for Testing
    • Why Patients Request Testing
    • Clinical Scenarios
    • Implications for Clinicians
    • Sidebar: Definitions of Test Characteristics
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Interpreting COVID-19 Test Results in Clinical Settings: It Depends!
  • Re: The Complex Interpretation and Management of Zika Virus Test Results
  • Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) Engagement: 20+ Years and Counting
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Practical Recommendations for Minimizing Pain and Anxiety with IUD Insertion
  • A Simplified Approach to Evaluate and Manage Shoulder Pain
  • Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms
Show more Evidence-Based Clinical Medicine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Decision Making
  • Pregnancy
  • Probability
  • Public Health
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Serologic Tests
  • Zika Virus

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire