Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design.
- Figure 2.
Tool use among arm 1 and arm 2 clinics during tool development and implementation.
Tables
Health center A B C D E F G Type FQHC FQHC FQHC FQHC FQHC RHC FQHC Number of patients 3,523 18,263 3,761 3,826 12,507 3,654 19,151 Proportion of visits by payer Uninsured 6.4% 11.9% 11.5% 45.4% 5.5% 6.5% 10.4% Medicaid 53.8% 59.7% 51.6% 45.0% 64.3% 30.7% 56.6% Medicare 22.3% 11.7% 16.4% 6.2% 6.6% 34.4% 19.4% Commercially Insured 15.7% 16.5% 18.2% 1.5% 2.9% 27.5% 13.2% Other public insurance* 1.9% 0.3% 2.3% 1.9% 20.8% 1.0% 0.5% Proportion non-White patients 7.7% 24.3% 3.1% 12.0% 23.5% 1.3% 3.6% Proportion Hispanic patients 6.5% 25.8% 26.7% 50.0% 60.5% 2.2% 18.5% FQHC, federally-qualified health center; RHC, rural health center.
Analysis Period: March 2016 to May 2017 (study is ongoing and will complete data collection in March 2018).
↵* Other Public Insurance includes publically-funded coverage sources, typically covering limited services (eg, breast and cervical cancer early detection program; title X contraceptive care) or available to specific populations (eg, Veterans Affairs and Tricare, Indian Health Service, grant programs for migrant/seasonal workers, and care for the homeless or individuals living with HIV/AIDS).
