Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Measuring and Managing Blood Pressure in a Primary Care Setting: A Pragmatic Implementation Study

John Doane, Jenni Buu, M. Jason Penrod, Michelle Bischoff, Molly B. Conroy and Barry Stults
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2018, 31 (3) 375-388; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170450
John Doane
From the Department of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City,UT (JD, MJP, MB, MBC, BS); Pharmacy Primary Care Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City (JB).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jenni Buu
From the Department of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City,UT (JD, MJP, MB, MBC, BS); Pharmacy Primary Care Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City (JB).
PharmD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Jason Penrod
From the Department of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City,UT (JD, MJP, MB, MBC, BS); Pharmacy Primary Care Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City (JB).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle Bischoff
From the Department of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City,UT (JD, MJP, MB, MBC, BS); Pharmacy Primary Care Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City (JB).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Molly B. Conroy
From the Department of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City,UT (JD, MJP, MB, MBC, BS); Pharmacy Primary Care Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City (JB).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry Stults
From the Department of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City,UT (JD, MJP, MB, MBC, BS); Pharmacy Primary Care Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City (JB).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Flow chart for home blood pressure (BP) implementation. HTN, hypertension; AOBP, Automated office blood pressure; HBPM, home blood pressure measurement.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of Clinic Patients with Elevated Blood Pressure, Both Enrolled and Not Enrolled in BP Monitoring Program

    Patient CharacteristicEnrolled (n = 183)Not Enrolled (n = 1326)
    Mean age, years (SD)59.7 (15.8)61.0 (15.9)
    Sex, n, (% male)103 (56)701 (53)
    Race, n, (% white)164 (90)1145 (86)
    Insurance type, (n % commercial)96 (52)620 (47)
    Comorbid medical conditions
        Diabetes, n (%)36 (20)326 (25)
        Cardiovascular disease, n (%)47 (26)424 (32)
        Hyperlipidemia, n (%)95 (52)757 (57)
        Chronic kidney disease*, n (%)17 (9)160 (12)
    Hypertension diagnosis in EHR, n (%)119 (65)919 (69)
    Median number of BP medications (25th percentile, 75th percentile)2.0 (1.0, 2.0)2.0 (1.0, 2.0)
    Median baseline SBP (25th percentile, 75th percentile)145.0 (138.0, 154.0)144 (140.0, 152.0)
    Median baseline DBP (25th percentile, 75th percentile)91.0 (85.0, 96.0)90.0 (81.0, 94.0)
    • ↵* Patients with ESRD were excluded from BP monitoring program.

    • SD, standard deviation; BP, blood pressure; EHR, electronic health record; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; ESRD, end stage renal disease.

    • View popup
    Table 2A.

    Diagnoses of Patients Not Initially on Medications after Initial HBPM Results Received, Stratified by Office Blood Pressure Technique (n = 84)

    DiagnosisMethod of OBPM
    AOBP ≥ 135/85 (n = 42)Observed Average of 3 BP ≥ 135/85 (n = 19)Single Observed BP ≥ 140/90 (n = 23)
    New HTN, n (%)22 (52)12 (63)11 (48)
    White coat HTN, n (%)14 (33)4 (21)11 (48)
    Diagnosis unknown (no initial HBPM received), n (%)6 (14)3 (16)1 (4)
    • Fisher's exact test was used to determine whether the proportion of diagnoses differed by OBPM technique (P = .39).

    • AOBP, automated office blood pressure; BP, blood pressure; HBPM, home blood pressure measurement; OBPM, office blood pressure measurement; HTN, hypertension.

    • View popup
    Table 2B.

    Diagnoses of Patients Initially on Medications after Initial and Final HBPM Results Received, Stratified by Office Blood Pressure Technique (n = 99)

    DiagnosisMethod of OBPM
    AOBP ≥ 135/85 (n = 48)Observed Average of 3 BP ≥ 135/85 (n = 21)Single Observed BP ≥ 140/90 (n = 30)
    Existing uncontrolled HTN, n (%)21 (44)15 (71)17 (57)
    White-coat BP elevation, n (%)20 (42)5 (24)12 (40)
    Unknown (no initial HBPM received), n (%)7 (14)1 (5)1 (3)
    • Fisher's exact test was used to determine whether the proportion of diagnoses differed by OBPM technique (P = .19).

    • AOBP, automated office blood pressure; BP, blood pressure; HBPM, home blood pressure measurement; OBPM, office blood pressure measurement; HTN, hypertension.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    AOBP and HBPM Time Requirements to Clinic and Medical Assistants

    Estimated Time Required (minutes)
    Unobserved* AOBP measurement4
    Patient training for HBPM10
    HBPM device accuracy assessment10
    EHR documentation of AOBP/HBPM data2
    Transmission of HBPM data to clinician2
    • ↵* MAs could attend to other duties at this time.

    • AOBP, automated office blood pressure measurement; EHR, electronic health record; HBPM, home blood pressure measurement.

    • View popup
    Supplemental Table 1.

    Staff Satisfaction Measures (n = 19)

    MANurse/PharmacistResident PhysicianAttending PhysicianOther
    421021
    QuestionTotalStrongly AgreeAgreeNeitherDisagreeStrongly DisagreeI Don't Know
    Project lowered BP and positively affected BP management, n (%)195 (26.3)8 (42.1)2 (10.5)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)4 (21.1)
    Project improved patient engagement, n (%)197 (36.8)7 (36.8)11 (57.9)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (5.3)
    Project requirement excessive effort form me, n (%)191 (5.3)2 (10.5)3 (15.8)11 (57.9)2 (10.5)X
    Feel adequately trained, n (%)195 (26.3)11 (57.9)3 (15.8)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)X
    Plan to continue educating pts, n (%)199 (47.4)10 (52.6)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)X
    QuestionTotalVery PositivePositiveNeutralNegativeVery Negative
    Impression of project to improve BP, n (%)198 (42.1)9 (47.4)2 (10.5)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
    QuestionTotal1 to 15 minutes16 to 30 minutes31 to 45 minutes46 to 60 minutes> 60 minutes
    Time spent/per pt on project, n (%)1917 (89.5)0 (0.0)2 (10.5)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
    • BP, blood pressure; MA, medical assistants.

    • View popup
    Supplemental Table 2.

    Patient Satisfaction Measures (n = 55) Patient Satisfaction

    QuestionTotalStrongly AgreeAgreeNeitherDisagreeStrongly Disagree
    Participation improved BP, n (%)568 (14)17 (30)26 (46)4 (7)1 (2)
    Helped me become more involved in BP care, n (%)5517 (31)29 (53)6 (11)2 (4)1 (2)
    Have more confidence in measuring BP, n (%)5417 (31)28 (52)7 (13)1 (2)1 (2)
    Staff replied in timely manner, n (%)5317 (32)27 (51)9 (17)0 (0)0 (0)
    Easy to follow instructions to check BP, n (%)5422 (41)27 (50)2 (4)3 (6)0 (0)
    QuestionTotal<15 Minutes16 to 30 Minutes31 to 60 Minutes>60 Minutes
    Time/day measuring BP, n (%)5434 (63)18 (33)2 (4)0 (0)
    QuestionTotalVery PositivePositiveNeutralNegativeVery Negative
    Overall impression of project, n (%)5326 (49)20 (38)7 (13)0 (0)0 (0)
    QuestionTotal1 to 2526 to 5051 to 7576 to 100Already HaveNot Willing to Buy
    Would be willing to spend $X on BP monitor, n (%)565 (9)13 (23)8 (14)4 (7)22 (39)4 (7)
    QuestionTotalYesNo
    Plan to continue home BP monitoring, n (%)5440 (74)14 (26)
    • BP, blood pressure.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 31 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 31, Issue 3
May-June 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measuring and Managing Blood Pressure in a Primary Care Setting: A Pragmatic Implementation Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Measuring and Managing Blood Pressure in a Primary Care Setting: A Pragmatic Implementation Study
John Doane, Jenni Buu, M. Jason Penrod, Michelle Bischoff, Molly B. Conroy, Barry Stults
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2018, 31 (3) 375-388; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170450

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Measuring and Managing Blood Pressure in a Primary Care Setting: A Pragmatic Implementation Study
John Doane, Jenni Buu, M. Jason Penrod, Michelle Bischoff, Molly B. Conroy, Barry Stults
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2018, 31 (3) 375-388; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170450
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix 1
    • Appendix 2
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Advancing the Science of Implementation in Primary Health Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Blood Pressure
  • Hypertension
  • Implementation Science
  • Personal Satisfaction
  • Primary Health Care
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire