Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Physician Multisite Practicing: Impact on Access to Care

Imam M. Xierali
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2018, 31 (2) 260-269; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170287
Imam M. Xierali
From Department of Family and Community Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Family Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Xierali IM,
    2. Fair MA,
    3. Johnson S,
    4. et al
    . Do free clinic experiences enhance medical student commitment to underserved areas? Analysis in Brief 2016;16(2). Available from: https://www.aamc.org/download/454750/data/february2016dofreeclinicexperiencesenhancemedicalstudentcommitm.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2016.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Armstrong D,
    2. Moore J
    ; Health Workforce Technical Assistance Center. The Health Workforce Minimum Data Set (MDS): what you need to know. Resource brief, January 2015. Available from: http://www.healthworkforceta.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/MDS_Resource_Brief.pdf. Accessed December 13, 2016.
  3. 3.↵
    World Health Organization; University of Technology Sydney. WHO human resources for health minimum data set. Available from: http://www.who.int/hrh/documents/hrh_minimum_data_set.pdf. Accessed December 13, 2016.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Staiger DO,
    2. Auerbach DI,
    3. Buerhaus PI
    . Comparison of physician workforce estimates and supply projections. JAMA 2009;302:1674–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. DesRoches CM,
    2. Barrett KA,
    3. Harvey BE,
    4. et al
    . The results are only as good as the sample: assessing three national physician sampling frames. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30(Suppl 3):S595–601.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Shi W
    . Principles of modeling uncertainties in spatial data and spatial analyses. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2010.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Lam NS
    . Geospatial methods for reducing uncertainties in environmental health risk assessment: challenges and opportunities. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2012;102:942–50.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Zandbergen PA,
    2. Hart TC,
    3. Lenzer KE,
    4. Camponovo ME
    . Error propagation models to examine the effects of geocoding quality on spatial analysis of individual-level datasets. Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol 2012;3:69–82.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bell S,
    2. Wilson K,
    3. Shah TI,
    4. Gersher S,
    5. Elliott T
    . Investigating impacts of positional error on potential health care accessibility. Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol 2012;3:17–29.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Shi X,
    2. Alford-Teaster J,
    3. Onega T,
    4. Wang D
    . Spatial access and local demand for major cancer care facilities in the United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2012;102:1125–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Shumsky NL,
    2. Bohland J,
    3. Knox P
    . Separating doctors' homes and doctors' offices: San Francisco, 1881–1941. Soc Sci Med 1986;23:1051–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. McLafferty S,
    2. Freeman VL,
    3. Barrett RE,
    4. Luo L,
    5. Shockley A
    . Spatial error in geocoding physician location data from the AMA Physician Masterfile: implications for spatial accessibility analysis. Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol 2012;3:31–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Shi X,
    2. Xue B,
    3. Xierali IM
    . Identifying the uncertainty in physician practice location through spatial analytics and text mining. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016;13. Pii: E930.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hu K,
    2. Sun Z,
    3. Rui Y,
    4. Gu S
    . Multisite licence to practise medicine in China. Lancet 2014;384:743.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Clinton C,
    2. Schmittling G,
    3. Stern TL,
    4. Black RR
    . Hospital privileges for family physicians: a national study of office based members of the American Academy of Family physicians. J Fam Pract 1981;13:361–71.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Rauch DA
    ; Committee on Hospital Care; Section on Hospital Medicine. Medical staff appointment and delineation of pediatric privileges in hospitals. Pediatrics 2012;129:784–7.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Cromley EK,
    2. Albertsen PC
    . Multiple-site physician practices and their effect on service distribution. Health Serv Res 1993;28:503–22.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Association of American Medical Colleges. Active physicians in the largest specialties, 2015. Table 1.1 Number of active physicians in the largest specialties by major professional activity, 2015. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data/workforce/reports/458480/1–1-chart.html. Accessed May 26, 2017.
  19. 19.↵
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Guide for eligible professionals practicing in multiple locations (EHR incentive programs in 2015 through 2017). Updated: March 2016. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/2016_EPMultipleLocations.pdf. Accessed May 26, 2017.
  20. 20.↵
    FAQ: new Medicaid requirements for ordering, prescribing or referring providers: an overview. Atlanta: Georgia Department of Community Health. Available from: https://www.mmis.georgia.gov/portal/Portals/0/StaticContent/Public/ALL/NOTICES/OPR%20FAQ%2020-08-2013%20163045%2020-03-2015%20163053.pdf. Accessed December 26, 2016.
  21. 21.↵
    Title 42 - Public Health, chapter IV (10–1-11 edition). Section 455–410: enrollment and screening of providers. Available from: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2011-title42-vol4/pdf/CFR-2011-title42-vol4-sec455–410.pdf. Accessed December 26, 2016.
  22. 22.↵
    Title 42 - Public Health, chapter IV (10–1-11 edition). Section 455.440: national provider identifier. Available from: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2011-title42-vol4/pdf/CFR-2011-title42-vol4-sec455–440.pdf. Accessed December 26, 2016.
  23. 23.↵
    Georgia Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS). Atlanta: Georgia Department of Community Health. Available from: https://dch.georgia.gov/medicaid-management-information-system-mmis. Accessed October 19, 2016.
  24. 24.↵
    1. Bindman AB
    . Using the national provider identifier for health care workforce evaluation. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev 2013;3. pii: mmrr.003.03.b03.
  25. 25.↵
    AMA physician masterfile. Chicago: American Medical Association. Available from: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/about-ama/physician-data-resources/physician-masterfile.page. Accessed April 12, 2015.
  26. 26.↵
    U.S. and Canada StreetMap. ESRI data & maps. Redland, CA: ESRI; 2014.
  27. 27.↵
    1. Luo W,
    2. Wang F
    . Measures of spatial accessibility to healthcare in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in Chicago region. Environ Plan B Urban Anal City Sci 2003;30:865–84.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Jia P,
    2. Xierali IM,
    3. Wang F
    . Evaluating and re-demarcating the hospital service areas in Florida. Appl Geogr 2015;60:248–53.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Jia P,
    2. Wang F,
    3. Xierali IM
    . Using a Huff-based model to delineate hospital service areas. Prof Geogr 2017;69:522–30.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Wang F
    . Measurement, optimization, and impact of health care accessibility. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2012;102:1104–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Peng Z
    . The jobs-housing balance and urban commuting. Urban Stud 1997;34:1215–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    American Community Survey (ACS): summary data file. 5-Year estimates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Available from: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/data/summary-file.html. Accessed March 17, 2017.
  33. 33.↵
    Georgia physician workforce profile. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2015. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/download/447164/data/georgiaprofile.pdf. Accessed May 26, 2017.
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kletke PR
    . Physician workforce data: when the best is not good enough. Health Serv Res 2004;39:1251–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Dall T,
    2. Chakrabarti R,
    3. Iacobucci W,
    4. Hansari A,
    5. West T
    ; IHS Markit. 2017 Update: the complexities of physician supply and demand: projections from 2015 to 2030. Final report. February 28, 2017. Available from: https://aamc-black.global.ssl.fastly.net/production/media/filer_public/a5/c3/a5c3d565–14ec-48fb-974b–99fafaeecb00/aamc_projections_update_2017.pdf. Accessed May 26, 2017.
  36. 36.↵
    1. Xierali IM,
    2. Hsiao CJ,
    3. Puffer JC,
    4. et al
    . The rise of electronic health record adoption among family physicians. Ann Fam Med 2013;11:14–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Hsiao C-J,
    2. Hing E
    . Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001–2013. NCHS data brief no. 143. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2014. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db143.pdf. Accessed May 26, 2017.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 31 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 31, Issue 2
March-April 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physician Multisite Practicing: Impact on Access to Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Physician Multisite Practicing: Impact on Access to Care
Imam M. Xierali
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2018, 31 (2) 260-269; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170287

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Physician Multisite Practicing: Impact on Access to Care
Imam M. Xierali
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2018, 31 (2) 260-269; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170287
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Group practice impacts on patients, physicians and healthcare systems: a scoping review
  • Real-Life Observational Studies Provide Actionable Data for Family Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Access to Health Care
  • American Medical Association
  • Census
  • Georgia
  • Group Practice
  • Medicaid
  • Primary Care Physicians

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire