Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Retrospective Comparison of Cardiac Testing and Results on Inpatients with Low Pretest Probability Compared with Moderate/High Pretest Probability for Coronary Artery Disease

Aaron Lear, Merritt Huber, Amy Canada, Jessica Robertson, Evan Bosman and Stephen Zyzanski
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2018, 31 (2) 219-225; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170295
Aaron Lear
From the Cleveland Clinic Akron General Family Medicine, Akron, OH (AL); Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (MH); CHI Franciscan Family Medicine, Tacoma, WA (AC); Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown (JR); Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron (EB); Case Western Reserve Department of Family Medicine, Cleveland (SZ).
MD, CAQ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Merritt Huber
From the Cleveland Clinic Akron General Family Medicine, Akron, OH (AL); Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (MH); CHI Franciscan Family Medicine, Tacoma, WA (AC); Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown (JR); Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron (EB); Case Western Reserve Department of Family Medicine, Cleveland (SZ).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy Canada
From the Cleveland Clinic Akron General Family Medicine, Akron, OH (AL); Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (MH); CHI Franciscan Family Medicine, Tacoma, WA (AC); Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown (JR); Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron (EB); Case Western Reserve Department of Family Medicine, Cleveland (SZ).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica Robertson
From the Cleveland Clinic Akron General Family Medicine, Akron, OH (AL); Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (MH); CHI Franciscan Family Medicine, Tacoma, WA (AC); Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown (JR); Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron (EB); Case Western Reserve Department of Family Medicine, Cleveland (SZ).
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evan Bosman
From the Cleveland Clinic Akron General Family Medicine, Akron, OH (AL); Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (MH); CHI Franciscan Family Medicine, Tacoma, WA (AC); Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown (JR); Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron (EB); Case Western Reserve Department of Family Medicine, Cleveland (SZ).
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Zyzanski
From the Cleveland Clinic Akron General Family Medicine, Akron, OH (AL); Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (MH); CHI Franciscan Family Medicine, Tacoma, WA (AC); Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown (JR); Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron (EB); Case Western Reserve Department of Family Medicine, Cleveland (SZ).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Amsterdam EA,
    2. Kirk JD,
    3. Bluemke DA,
    4. et al
    . Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010;122:1756–76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Scott AC,
    2. O'Dwyer KM,
    3. Cullen L,
    4. Brown A,
    5. Denaro C,
    6. Parsonage W
    . Implementation of a chest pain management service improves patient care and reduces length of stay. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2014;13:9–13.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kline JA,
    2. Jones AE,
    3. Shapiro NI,
    4. et al
    . Multicenter, randomized trial of quantitative pretest probability to reduce unnecessary medical radiation exposure in emergency department patients with chest pain and dyspnea. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:66–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Khare RK,
    2. Powell ES,
    3. Venkatesh AK,
    4. Courtney DM
    . Diagnostic uncertainty and costs associated with current emergency department evaluation of low risk chest pain. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2008;7:191–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mahler SA,
    2. Burke GL,
    3. Goff DC,
    4. et al
    . Avoidable utilization of the chest pain observation unit: Evaluation of very-low-risk patients. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2013;12:59–64.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Skinner JS,
    2. Smeeth L,
    3. Kendall JM,
    4. et al
    . NICE guidance. Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis of recent onset chest pain or discomfort of suspected cardiac origin. Heart 2010;96:974–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Montalescot G,
    2. Sechtem U,
    3. Achenbach S,
    4. et al
    . 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2949–3003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Pryor DB,
    2. Harrell FE Jr.,
    3. Lee KL,
    4. Califf RM,
    5. Rosati RA
    . Estimating the likelihood of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Med 1983;75:771–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Diamond GA,
    2. Forrester JS
    . Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1350–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Genders TS,
    2. Steyerberg EW,
    3. Hunink MG,
    4. et al
    . Prediction model to estimate presence of coronary artery disease: retrospective pooled analysis of existing cohorts. BMJ 2012;344(June):e3485.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Penumetsa SC,
    2. Mallidi J,
    3. Friderici JL,
    4. Hiser W,
    5. Rothberg MB
    . Outcomes of patients admitted for observation of chest pain. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:873–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hermann LK,
    2. Newman DH,
    3. Pleasant WA,
    4. et al
    . Yield of routine provocative cardiac testing among patients in an emergency department-based chest pain unit. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:1128–33.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Napoli AM
    . The association between pretest probability of coronary artery disease and stress test utilization and outcomes in a chest pain observation unit. Acad Emerg Med 2014;21:401–7.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Demarco DC,
    2. Papachristidis A,
    3. Roper D,
    4. et al
    . Pre-test probability risk scores and their use in contemporary management of patients with chest pain: One year stress echo cohort study. JRSM Open 2015;6(11):2054270415611295.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Cotarlan V,
    2. Ho D,
    3. Pineda J,
    4. Qureshi A,
    5. Shirani J
    . Impact of clinical predictors and routine coronary artery disease testing on outcome of patients admitted to chest pain decision unit. Clin Cardiol 2014;37:146–51.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Than M,
    2. Aldous S,
    3. Lord SJ,
    4. et al
    . A 2-hour diagnostic protocol for possible cardiac chest pain in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:51–8.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Scott SR,
    2. Riedinger MS,
    3. Conner L,
    4. et al
    . Practice guidelines and reminders to reduce duration of hospital stay for patients with chest pain. An interventional trial. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:257–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ladapo JA,
    2. Blecker S,
    3. Douglas PS
    . Physician decision making and trends in the use of cardiac stress testing in the United States: An analysis of repeated cross-sectional data. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:482–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Scanlon PJ,
    2. Faxon DP,
    3. Audet A,
    4. et al
    . ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 May;33:1756–824.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Tavakol M,
    2. Ashraf S,
    3. Brener SJ
    . Risks and complications of coronary angiography: A comprehensive review. Glob J Health Sci 2012;4:65–93.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Baldessarini RJ,
    2. Finklestein S,
    3. Arana GW
    . The predictive power of diagnostic tests and the effect of prevalence of illness. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983;40:569–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 31 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 31, Issue 2
March-April 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Retrospective Comparison of Cardiac Testing and Results on Inpatients with Low Pretest Probability Compared with Moderate/High Pretest Probability for Coronary Artery Disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Retrospective Comparison of Cardiac Testing and Results on Inpatients with Low Pretest Probability Compared with Moderate/High Pretest Probability for Coronary Artery Disease
Aaron Lear, Merritt Huber, Amy Canada, Jessica Robertson, Evan Bosman, Stephen Zyzanski
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2018, 31 (2) 219-225; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170295

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Retrospective Comparison of Cardiac Testing and Results on Inpatients with Low Pretest Probability Compared with Moderate/High Pretest Probability for Coronary Artery Disease
Aaron Lear, Merritt Huber, Amy Canada, Jessica Robertson, Evan Bosman, Stephen Zyzanski
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2018, 31 (2) 219-225; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170295
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Real-Life Observational Studies Provide Actionable Data for Family Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Pretest Probability
  • Stress Test

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire