Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
  • JABFM On Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Information Transfer and the Hospital Discharge Summary: National Primary Care Provider Perspectives of Challenges and Opportunities

Paul M. Robelia, Deanne T. Kashiwagi, Sarah M. Jenkins, James S. Newman and Atsushi Sorita
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2017, 30 (6) 758-765; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170194
Paul M. Robelia
the Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (PMR); Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester (DTK, JSN, AS); Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester (SMJ).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deanne T. Kashiwagi
the Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (PMR); Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester (DTK, JSN, AS); Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester (SMJ).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah M. Jenkins
the Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (PMR); Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester (DTK, JSN, AS); Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester (SMJ).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James S. Newman
the Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (PMR); Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester (DTK, JSN, AS); Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester (SMJ).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Atsushi Sorita
the Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (PMR); Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester (DTK, JSN, AS); Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester (SMJ).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Discharge summary information inclusion and perceived importance. HDS, Hospital Discharge Summary.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Self-Reported Primary Care Provider Practice Characteristics and Summary Findings

    No. (%)*
    Use electronic medical records
        N471
        Yes436 (93)
        No35 (7)
    Frequency of having direct access to inpatient data
        N463
        0% to 20% of the time98 (21)
        21% to 40%40 (9)
        41% to 60%55 (12)
        61% to 80%96 (21)
        81% to 100%174 (38)
    Frequency that hospital discharge summary is available at followup
        N466
        0% to 20% of the time63 (13.5%)
        21% to 40% of the time65 (13.9%)
        41% to 60% of the time84 (18.0%)
        61% to 80% of the time109 (23.4%)
        81% to 100% of the time145 (31.1%)
    Frequency that hospital discharge summary contains all information needed
        N464
        0% to 20% of the time59 (12.7%)
        21% to 40% of the time64 (13.8%)
        41% to 60% of the time89 (19.2%)
        61% to 80% of the time136 (29.3%)
        81% to 100% of the time116 (25.0%)
    Percentage of time spent on outpatient primary care
        N471
        Never9 (2)
        1% to 25% of the time18 (4)
        26% to 50% of the time29 (6)
        51% to 75% of the time59 (13)
        76% to 100% of the time356 (76)
    Percentage of time spent on inpatient care
        N465
        Never263 (57)
        1% to 25% of the time159 (34)
        26% to 50% of the time29 (6)
        51% to 75% of the time6 (1)
        76% to 100% of the time8 (2)
    Time in practice (years)
        N473
        0 to 52 (0)
        6 to 1021 (4)
        11 to 1578 (16)
        16 to 20101 (21)
        21 to 2574 (16)
        26 to 3077 (16)
        >30120 (25)
    Practice community size
        N471
        <5000 people32 (7)
        5 to 20,00080 (17)
        20 to 50,00073 (15)
        50 to 100,00074 (16)
        100 to 500,000116 (25)
        >500,00096 (20)
    Practice setting (multiple choice)
        N474
        Solo practice79 (17)
        Single specialty group130 (27)
        Multispecialty group85 (18)
        Community clinic31 (7)
        Hospital-owned clinic89 (19)
        Hospital inpatient6 (1)
        HMO21 (4)
        Academic41 (9)
        Other57 (12)
    • ↵* The number of total responses is different by question due to missing data.

    • HMO, Health Maintenance Organization.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Availability of Hospital Discharge Summary (HDS) by Key Characteristics (Row Percentages Shown)

    Availability of HDSP-Value*P-Value†
    0% to 40% of the Time (N = 128)41% to 80% of the Time (N = 193)81% to 100% of the Time (N = 145)
    Direct access to inpatient data<.0001<.0001
        0% to 40% of the time91 (65.9%)40 (29.0%)7 (5.1%)
        41% to 80% of the time30 (19.9%)109 (72.2%)12 (7.9%)
        81% to 100% of the time5 (2.9%)43 (24.7%)126 (72.4%)
    Community size.79.15
        ≤20,00034 (30.6%)39 (35.1%)38 (34.2%)
        20,001 to 100,00040 (27.8%)60 (41.7%)44 (30.6%)
        100,001 to 500,00030 (26.1%)53 (46.1%)32 (27.8%)
        >500,00024 (25.5%)39 (41.5%)31 (33.0%)
    Practice type
        Solo.0003.58
            No92 (23.8%)166 (42.9%)129 (33.3%)
            Yes36 (45.6%)27 (34.2%)16 (20.3%)
        Single-specialty group.28.68
            No87 (25.8%)139 (41.2%)111 (32.9%)
            Yes41 (31.8%)54 (41.9%)34 (26.4%)
        Multi-specialty group.007.82
            No115 (30.2%)157 (41.2%)109 (28.6%)
            Yes13 (15.3%)36 (42.4%)36 (42.4%)
        Hospital-owned office-based.049.73
            No112 (29.7%)155 (41.1%)110 (29.2%)
            Yes16 (18.0%)38 (42.7%)35 (39.3%)
        Academic.09.02§
            No117 (27.5%)182 (42.7%)127 (29.8%)
            Yes11 (27.5%)11 (27.5%)18 (45.0%)
        Other‡.23.56
            No102 (27.9%)144 (39.5%)119 (32.6%)
            Yes26 (25.7%)49 (48.5%)26 (25.7%)
    • ↵* Unadjusted P-value (χ2 test).

    • ↵† Adjusted P-value from nominal logistic regression model including all predictors listed in this table.

    • ↵‡ Community clinic, hospital inpatient, group staff HMO, or other.

    • ↵§ When stratified according to direct access to inpatient data, there is slightly less availability of the HDS among those in academic settings (see Table 3).

    • HMO, Health Maintenance Organization.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Hospital Discharge Summary (HDS) Availability in Academic Versus Non-Academic Settings

    Availability of HDSDirect Access to Inpatient Data
    0% to 40%41% to 80%81% to 100%
    Non-academicAcademicNon-academicAcademicNon-academicAcademic
    0% to 40% of the time85 (64%)6 (100%)26 (18%)4 (50%)4 (3%)1 (4%)
    41% to 80% of the time40 (30%)105 (73%)4 (50%)36 (24%)7 (27%)
    81% to 100% of the time7 (5%)12 (8%)108 (73%)18 (69%)
    Total (N)132 (100%)6 (100%)143 (100%)8 (100%)148 (100%)26 (100%)
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 30 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 30, Issue 6
November-December 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Information Transfer and the Hospital Discharge Summary: National Primary Care Provider Perspectives of Challenges and Opportunities
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Information Transfer and the Hospital Discharge Summary: National Primary Care Provider Perspectives of Challenges and Opportunities
Paul M. Robelia, Deanne T. Kashiwagi, Sarah M. Jenkins, James S. Newman, Atsushi Sorita
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2017, 30 (6) 758-765; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170194

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Information Transfer and the Hospital Discharge Summary: National Primary Care Provider Perspectives of Challenges and Opportunities
Paul M. Robelia, Deanne T. Kashiwagi, Sarah M. Jenkins, James S. Newman, Atsushi Sorita
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2017, 30 (6) 758-765; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170194
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Patient-Held Active Record of Medication Status (PHARMS) study: a mixed-methods feasibility analysis
  • Multiple Practical Facts and Ideas to Improve Family Medicine Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Interpersonal Primary Care Continuity for Chronic Conditions Is Associated with Fewer Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits Among Medicaid Enrollees
  • Food Insecurity Screening in Safety-Net Clinics in Los Angeles County: Lessons for Post-Pandemic Planning
  • The Prevalence of Periodontitis Among US Adults with Multimorbidity Using NHANES Data 2011–2014
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Care Transition
  • Health Care Surveys
  • Health Information Technology
  • Hospitalists
  • Information Storage and Retrieval
  • Patient Discharge
  • Primary Care Physicians

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2023 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire