Dynamic Electronic Health Record Note Prototype: Seeing More by Showing Less

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Belden JL,
   2. Koopman RJ

   . Making EHR notes more readable. Fam Pract Manag 2013;20:8–9.

   OpenUrl
2. 2.↵
   1. Oxentenko AS,
   2. West CP,
   3. Popkave C,
   4. Weinberger SE,
   5. Kolars JC

   . Time spent on clinical documentation: A survey of internal medicine residents and program directors. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:377–380.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Shoolin J,
   2. Ozeran L,
   3. Hamann C,
   4. Bria W 2nd.

   . Association of Medical Directors of Information Systems consensus on inpatient electronic health record documentation. Appl Clin Inform 2013;4:293–303.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Siegler EL,
   2. Adelman R

   . Copy and paste: A remediable hazard of electronic health records. Am J Med 2009;122:495–496.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Rosenbloom ST,
   2. Denny JC,
   3. Xu H,
   4. Lorenzi N,
   5. Stead WW,
   6. Johnson KB

   . Data from clinical notes: A perspective on the tension between structure and flexible documentation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:181–186.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Singh H,
   2. Wilson L,
   3. Reis B,
   4. Sawhney MK,
   5. Espadas D,
   6. Sittig DF

   . Ten strategies to improve management of abnormal test result alerts in the electronic health record. J Patient Saf 2010;6:121–123.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Beasley JW,
   2. Wetterneck TB,
   3. Temte J,
   4. et al

   . Information chaos in primary care: Implications for physician performance and patient safety. J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:745–751.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Logan JR,
   2. Gorman PN,
   3. Middleton B

   . Measuring the quality of medical records: A method for comparing completeness and correctness of clinical encounter data. Proc AMIA Symp 2001;408–412.
9. 9.↵
   1. Stetson PD,
   2. Bakken S,
   3. Wrenn JO,
   4. Siegler EL

   . Assessing electronic note quality using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9). Appl Clin Inform 2012;3:164–174.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Stetson PD,
    2. Morrison FP,
    3. Bakken S,
    4. Johnson SB

    . Preliminary development of the physician documentation quality instrument. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:534–541.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Hanson JL,
    2. Stephens MB,
    3. Pangaro LN,
    4. Gimbel RW

    . Quality of outpatient clinical notes: A stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:407.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Friedberg MW,
    2. Chen PG,
    3. Van Busum KR,
    4. et al

    . Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction and their implications for patient care, health systems, and health policy. The RAND Corporation; 2015.
13. 13.↵
    1. Lin CT,
    2. McKenzie M,
    3. Pell J,
    4. Caplan L

    . Health care provider satisfaction with a new electronic progress note format: SOAP vs APSO format. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:160–162.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Pullen E

    . APSO needs to replace SOAP in EMRs. The Health Care Blog. 2010.
15. 15.↵
    1. Versel N

    . APSO vs. SOAP, continued. Meaningful HIT News. 2014.
16. 16.↵
    1. Brown PJ,
    2. Marquard JL,
    3. Amster B,
    4. et al

    . What do physicians read (and ignore) in electronic progress notes? Appl Clin Inform 2014;5:430–444.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Koopman RJ,
    2. Steege LM,
    3. Moore JL,
    4. et al

    . Physician information needs and electronic health records (EHRs): Time to reengineer the clinic note. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:316–323.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Clarke MA,
    2. Steege LM,
    3. Moore JL,
    4. Koopman RJ,
    5. Belden JL,
    6. Kim MS

    . Determining primary care physician information needs to inform ambulatory visit note display. Appl Clin Inform 2014;5:169–190.

    OpenUrl
19. 19.↵
    1. Belden J,
    2. Patel J,
    3. Lowrance N,
    4. et al

    . Inspired EHRs: Designing for clinicians. 2014.
20. 20.↵
    1. Hart SG,
    2. Staveland LE

    . Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advance Psychol 1988;52:139–183.

    OpenUrl
21. 21.↵
    1. Sauro J

    . Measuring usability with the system usability scale (SUS). 2011. Available from: https://measuringu.com/sus/. Accessed January 29, 2017.