Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

A Group Visit Initiative Improves Advance Care Planning Documentation among Older Adults in Primary Care

Hillary D. Lum, Rebecca L. Sudore, Daniel D. Matlock, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga, Jacqueline Jones, Molly Nowels, Robert S. Schwartz, Jean S. Kutner and Cari R. Levy
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2017, 30 (4) 480-490; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170036
Hillary D. Lum
From the Divisions of Geriatric Medicine (HDL, DDM, RSS) and General Internal Medicine (JSK), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; the Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Denver (HDL, DDM, RSS); the Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (RLS); the San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco (RLS); the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (DDM, EJC); the Colorado School of Public Health, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (EJC, MN); the University of Colorado College of Nursing, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (JJ); and the Denver-Seattle Center on Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO (CRL).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca L. Sudore
From the Divisions of Geriatric Medicine (HDL, DDM, RSS) and General Internal Medicine (JSK), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; the Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Denver (HDL, DDM, RSS); the Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (RLS); the San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco (RLS); the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (DDM, EJC); the Colorado School of Public Health, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (EJC, MN); the University of Colorado College of Nursing, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (JJ); and the Denver-Seattle Center on Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO (CRL).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel D. Matlock
From the Divisions of Geriatric Medicine (HDL, DDM, RSS) and General Internal Medicine (JSK), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; the Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Denver (HDL, DDM, RSS); the Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (RLS); the San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco (RLS); the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (DDM, EJC); the Colorado School of Public Health, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (EJC, MN); the University of Colorado College of Nursing, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (JJ); and the Denver-Seattle Center on Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO (CRL).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga
From the Divisions of Geriatric Medicine (HDL, DDM, RSS) and General Internal Medicine (JSK), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; the Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Denver (HDL, DDM, RSS); the Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (RLS); the San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco (RLS); the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (DDM, EJC); the Colorado School of Public Health, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (EJC, MN); the University of Colorado College of Nursing, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (JJ); and the Denver-Seattle Center on Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO (CRL).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacqueline Jones
From the Divisions of Geriatric Medicine (HDL, DDM, RSS) and General Internal Medicine (JSK), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; the Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Denver (HDL, DDM, RSS); the Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (RLS); the San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco (RLS); the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (DDM, EJC); the Colorado School of Public Health, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (EJC, MN); the University of Colorado College of Nursing, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (JJ); and the Denver-Seattle Center on Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO (CRL).
PhD, RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Molly Nowels
From the Divisions of Geriatric Medicine (HDL, DDM, RSS) and General Internal Medicine (JSK), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; the Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Denver (HDL, DDM, RSS); the Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (RLS); the San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco (RLS); the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (DDM, EJC); the Colorado School of Public Health, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (EJC, MN); the University of Colorado College of Nursing, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (JJ); and the Denver-Seattle Center on Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO (CRL).
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert S. Schwartz
From the Divisions of Geriatric Medicine (HDL, DDM, RSS) and General Internal Medicine (JSK), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; the Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Denver (HDL, DDM, RSS); the Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (RLS); the San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco (RLS); the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (DDM, EJC); the Colorado School of Public Health, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (EJC, MN); the University of Colorado College of Nursing, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (JJ); and the Denver-Seattle Center on Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO (CRL).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean S. Kutner
From the Divisions of Geriatric Medicine (HDL, DDM, RSS) and General Internal Medicine (JSK), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; the Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Denver (HDL, DDM, RSS); the Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (RLS); the San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco (RLS); the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (DDM, EJC); the Colorado School of Public Health, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (EJC, MN); the University of Colorado College of Nursing, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (JJ); and the Denver-Seattle Center on Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO (CRL).
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cari R. Levy
From the Divisions of Geriatric Medicine (HDL, DDM, RSS) and General Internal Medicine (JSK), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; the Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Denver (HDL, DDM, RSS); the Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (RLS); the San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco (RLS); the Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (DDM, EJC); the Colorado School of Public Health, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (EJC, MN); the University of Colorado College of Nursing, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (JJ); and the Denver-Seattle Center on Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO (CRL).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Design for the advance care planning group visit intervention. This flowchart provides an overview of patients (n = 118) and nonparticipants (n = 385) who were referred for the intervention. At baseline, participants were scheduled for two 2-hour group visits, 1 month apart, with follow-up at 3 and 12 months. *One patient missed the first session but desired to participate in the second session. EMR, electronic medical record.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Documentation of advance care planning (ACP) among group visit participants (n = 118) at baseline and the 3- and 12-month follow-ups. Patient documentation of surrogate decision makers and ACP forms at baseline and at 3 and 12 months. The comparisons of baseline versus 3 months and baseline versus 12 months are significant at P <.001.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 3.

    The type of advance care planning forms among group visit participants (n = 118) at baseline and at the 3- and 12-month follow-ups. Specific forms were available in the participants' electronic medical records. Participants could have >1 type of advance care planning form.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Baseline Characteristics of Advance Care Planning Group Visit Participants versus Nonparticipants

    CharacteristicsAll Clinics (n = 118)Clinic 1 (n = 32)Clinic 2 (n = 64)Clinic 3 (n = 22)Nonparticipants (n = 385)P Value*
    Age (years), mean (SD)76 (6.5)79 (5.3)75 (6.6)75 (6.3)74 (7.0).005
    Female sex73 (62)19 (59)37 (58)17 (77)251 (65).49
    Race
        Native American2 (1.7)1 (3.1)0 (0)1 (4.5)N/A
        Hispanic or Latino5 (4.2)1 (3.1)3 (4.7)1 (4.5)
        Black/African American13 (11)7 (22)5 (7.8)1 (4.5)
        Non-Hispanic white97 (82)23 (72)55 (86)19 (86)
    Relationship status
        Married or with partner73 (62)16 (50)49 (77)8 (36)N/A
        Widowed27 (23)9 (28)11 (17)7 (32)
        Divorced or separated12 (10)4 (13)4 (6.3)4 (18)
        Single5 (4.2)2 (6.3)0 (0)3 (14)
    Self-reported health status†
        Excellent/very good/good103 (87)23 (72)61 (95)19 (86)N/A
        Fair/poor8 (7.2)4 (13)1 (1.6)3 (14)
    Caregiver for another person26 (22)7 (22)15 (23)4 (18)N/A
    Attended with a spouse56 (47)10 (31)40 (64)6 (27)N/A
    Type of insurance‡
        Medicare112 (96)32 (100)60 (94)20 (91)301 (78)<.001
        TRICARE63 (54)17 (53)39 (61)7 (32)148 (38).005
        Medicaid7 (6.0)4 (13)2 (3.1)1 (4.5)22 (5.7).93
        Other5 (4.3)2 (6.3)1 (1.6)2 (9.1)51 (13)<.001
    Education
        Less than high school1 (0.8)1 (3.1)0 (0)0 (0)N/A
        High school graduate19 (16)3 (9.4)12 (19)4 (18)
        Some college29 (25)7 (22)18 (28)4 (18)
        College graduate26 (22)7 (22)13 (20)6 (27)
        Postgraduate/professional38 (32)10 (31)20 (31)8 (36)
    Referral source
        Primary care provider93 (79)24 (75)50 (78)19 (86)
        Spouse/partner9 (7.6)2 (6.3)7 (11)0 (0)N/A
        Self-referred14 (12)4 (13)7 (11)3 (14)
        Friend2 (1.7)2 (6.3)0 (0)0 (0)
    • Data are n (%) unless otherwise indicated. The table compares participants in all clinics (n = 118) with nonparticipants (n = 385) for age, sex, and type of insurance.

    • ↵* All participants vs nonparticipants.

    • ↵† Health status was reported during check-in at the first session.

    • ↵‡ More than one insurance type could be listed.

    • N/A, not available.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Patient's Reasons for Participating in the Advance Care Planning Group Visit

    CategoryParticipant Mentions, n (%)Exemplar Quote
    Recognizes importance of advance care planning34 (30%)“I want to get everything taken care of so my kids don't have to do it and they will know exactly what to do when the time comes. My mother and dad did that for me.”
    “I feel this is going to be good for me too. It's something that my husband and I need to think about. We were hoping it would help out [our daughter, now deceased], and I know now that it's something that we all have to think about.”
    Recommended by primary care provider27 (24%)“We [a married couple] were advised by our primary care physician to attend the meeting and so we're here to learn.”
    Curiosity23 (20%)“I'm here because I wanted to know what you have to say, know what other people are thinking. There are some things I've had problems with making decisions on… . Mainly I wanted to know what other people are thinking and planning especially with the life support.”
    “I'm his wife. Some time ago we made the will, or whatever you call it. And we have 8 children. They are very supportive. They don't want to talk about this, so we really haven't … but I have no worries. I'm interested to see what is here.”
    Revisit existing advance directive forms19 (17%), including 3 (2.6%) related to relocating“We've done quite a bit of paperwork and stuff, but I keep seeing things that apparently we are missing or something like that. And we probably will have to redo things, like a will or something. It's been a long time. But I'd just like to make sure. “Cause every time I have these forms, they are different. And I get different stories about them.”
    “I've only been in Colorado about a year and a half and each state does things differently. I had some of the stuff already done when I lived in Texas. I really don't know if it's good here or not, so I'm here to get information and see if what I do have is any good or not.”
    Personal experiences17 (15%)“I was [my husband's] caretaker this past year and he passed away less than a year ago. What brings me here is the fact that he was in really good health. He was a skier at 76 and it was cancer and the surgery did not go well and he was in ICU for 45 days and never came home. He did leave medical directives but it turned out not to be as comprehensive as I think I would like mine to be.”
    Outreach by letter, call, flyer14 (12%)“I saw your poster. And I was having an appointment with [Dr. M.], who is my primary care [provider] and she asked me if I would be interested and I said yes.”
    Desire to talk with family13 (11%)“I have three sons and they don't want to hear anything about it … wish I had a daughter. I'll have to impress upon them what I want.”
    Age11 (9.6%)“I'm not a spring chicken any more, better start thinking about putting things in order. We talked about the attorney or the medical living will and so on. It's always good to get all those things in order.”
    “Why I am here? Because I'm old [laughing] like all of us here and of the decision that we either avoid making or it's never the right time and that may be something that, you know, I'll find out a little bit more what is the right direction, what do I envision for myself.”
    Suggested by loved ones10 (8.7%)“I just came because my children thought maybe I should get some help!”
    “I hadn't begun to think of any of these questions in my own mind, but we received a form letter of inquiry about the group session and through the diligence and organization of my wife, we're here and hope to gain a lot.”
    Complete advance directive forms8 (7.0%)“I just wanted to make sure that the formal forms or whatever are available to medical personnel so that my wishes, as far as end-of-life issues are followed—what I want done, or not done.”
    “I'm here really to figure out what forms do I file where and so forth. It's sort of confusing to me.”
    • We identified 115 statements from intervention participants and analyzed their stated reasons for attending the advance care planning group visit. Percentages are >100% because >1 reason could be coded per participant statement. Four participant statements (3.5%) did not have an identifiable reason (eg, “I'm just here”).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 30 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 30, Issue 4
July-August 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Group Visit Initiative Improves Advance Care Planning Documentation among Older Adults in Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Group Visit Initiative Improves Advance Care Planning Documentation among Older Adults in Primary Care
Hillary D. Lum, Rebecca L. Sudore, Daniel D. Matlock, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga, Jacqueline Jones, Molly Nowels, Robert S. Schwartz, Jean S. Kutner, Cari R. Levy
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2017, 30 (4) 480-490; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170036

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Group Visit Initiative Improves Advance Care Planning Documentation among Older Adults in Primary Care
Hillary D. Lum, Rebecca L. Sudore, Daniel D. Matlock, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga, Jacqueline Jones, Molly Nowels, Robert S. Schwartz, Jean S. Kutner, Cari R. Levy
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2017, 30 (4) 480-490; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170036
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Advance care planning in COPD: guidance development for healthcare professionals
  • Clinician Perspectives on Group Visits for Advance Care Planning Among Caregivers and Older Adult Patients With Heart Failure
  • Feasibility of Group Visits for Advance Care Planning Among Patients with Heart Failure and Their Caregivers
  • Features of U.S. Primary Care Physicians and Their Practices Associated with Advance Care Planning Conversations
  • A Reflective Case Study in Family Medicine Advance Care Planning Conversations
  • In This Issue: Opiates, Tobacco, Social Determinants of Health, Social Accountability for Non-Profit Hospitals, More on PCMH, and Clinical Topics
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Advance Care Planning
  • Advance Directives
  • Decision Making
  • Documentation
  • Palliative Care
  • Patient Appointments
  • Primary Health Care

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire