Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Diagnosing Hypertension in Primary Care Clinics According to Current Guidelines

Sarah Woolsey, Brittany Brown, Brenda Ralls, Michael Friedrichs and Barry Stults
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2017, 30 (2) 170-177; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160111
Sarah Woolsey
From HealthInsight Utah, Salt Lake City (SW); the Utah Department of Health (BB, BR, MF); and the Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (BS).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brittany Brown
From HealthInsight Utah, Salt Lake City (SW); the Utah Department of Health (BB, BR, MF); and the Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (BS).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brenda Ralls
From HealthInsight Utah, Salt Lake City (SW); the Utah Department of Health (BB, BR, MF); and the Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (BS).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Friedrichs
From HealthInsight Utah, Salt Lake City (SW); the Utah Department of Health (BB, BR, MF); and the Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (BS).
MStat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry Stults
From HealthInsight Utah, Salt Lake City (SW); the Utah Department of Health (BB, BR, MF); and the Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (BS).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Flow of participants in study.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of Responding Clinics Compared to All Utah Primary Care Clinics

    Clinic CharacteristicsRespondents (n = 123)Utah Primary Care Clinics (n = 398)
    Clinic type
        Family medicine83 (67.5)252 (63.3)
        General practice12 (9.8)10 (2.5)
        Internal medicine19 (15.4)54 (13.6)
        Geriatrics3 (2.4)7 (1.8)
        Multispecialty3 (2.4)41 (10.3)
        Other3 (2.4)34 (8.5)
        Total123 (100.0)398 (100.0)
    Geographic density
        Urban76 (61.8)243 (61.1)
        Rural/frontier47 (38.2)155 (38.9)
        Total123 (100.0)398 (100.0)
    Integration level*
        Low57 (46.3)275 (69.1)
        High66 (53.7)123 (30.9)
        Total123 (100.0)398 (100.0)
    • Data are n (%).

    • ↵* Low integration indicates a solo, independent clinic or a clinic that is part of a health care system that does not include a hospital. High integration represents a clinic that is part of a health care system that includes a hospital.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Characteristics of Clinics Responding to Assessment

    Practice CharacteristicsNo. (%)
    Setting
        Federally qualified health center20 (16.3)
        Hospital-based practice3 (2.4)
        University-based practice11 (8.9)
        Group practice (>2 providers)61 (49.6)
        Small or solo practice (1 or 2 providers)22 (17.9)
        School-based community clinic2 (1.6)
        Other4 (3.3)
        Total123 (100.0)
    Practice type
        Family medicine83 (67.5)
        General practice12 (9.8)
        Internal medicine19 (15.4)
        Geriatrics3 (2.4)
        Multispecialty3 (2.4)
        Other3 (2.4)
        Total123 (99.9)*
    Practice size†
        1–240 (32.5)
        3–535 (28.5)
        6–1030 (24.4)
        ≥1015 (12.2)
        Missing3 (2.4)
        Total123 (100.0)
    Geographic density
        Urban76 (61.8)
        Rural47 (38.2)
        Total123 (100.0)
    Integration level‡
        Low57 (46.3)
        High66 (53.7)
        Total123 (100.0)
    • ↵* This total did not equal 100% because of rounding.

    • ↵† Full-time equivalent physicians and advanced practice clinicians.

    • ↵‡ Low integration indicates a solo, independent clinic or a clinic that is part of a health care system that does not include a hospital. High integration indicates a clinic that is part of a health care system that includes a hospital.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Percentage of Clinics Adherent to US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations

    USPSTF Recommendation6Utah Million Hearts Assessment QuestionClinics Adherent to Recommendation, % (95% CI)
    In-office blood pressure measurement
        Use the mean of 2 measurementsQ11: Repeat the measurement within 1 to 2 minutes and use the mean of 2 measures58.5 (49.7–67.4)
        Measure while the patient is seatedQ5: Patient seated in a chair with back support87.0 (81.0–93.0)
        Allow for ≥5 minutes between entry into office and BP measurementQ8: Measure BP after the patient has rested quietly for 5 minutes before measurement57.7 (48.9–66.6)
        Use an appropriately sized arm cuffQ10: Use a cuff size appropriate to the patient's midarm circumference93.5 (89.1–97.9)
        Place the patient's arm at the level of the right atriumQ7: Measure BP with the patient arm and cuff at midsternal level84.6 (78.1–91.0)
    Out-of-office hypertension diagnosis confirmation
        ABPM may be used to confirm a diagnosis after initial screeningQ18: Practice has access to 24-hour ABPM studies25.2 (17.4–33.0)
        HBPM may be used to confirm a diagnosis after initial screeningQ15: Practice has a written policy for training patients on accurate HBPM27.6 (19.6–35.7)
    Q16: Staff distribute materials for HBPM for newly diagnosed patients or those with uncontrolled hypertension36.6 (28.0–45.2)
    Q17: Practice designates at least 1 member of the care team to provide individualized training in accurate HBPM48.8 (39.8–57.7)
        Recommends use of a regular screening intervalQ23: Practice has a system to alert patients with uncontrolled hypertension of a missed appointment or overdue BP check55.3 (46.4–64.2)
    • ABPM, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; CI, confidence interval; BP, blood pressure; HBPM, home blood pressure monitoring; USPSTF, US Preventive Services Task Force.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Level of Clinic Integration and Number of US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations Adhered to by Clinic

    Integration Level*Number of USPSTF Recommendations Adhered ToTotal
    0–45–78–10
    Low20 (35.1)31 (54.4)6 (10.5)57 (100.0)
    High17 (25.8)25 (37.9)24 (36.4)66 (100.0)
    Total37 (30.1)56 (45.5)30 (24.4)123 (100.0)
    • Data are n (%).

    • Differences are statistically significant (P < .01).

    • ↵* Low integration indicates a solo, independent clinic or a clinic that is part of a health care system that does not include a hospital. High integration represents clinics that are part of a health care system that includes a hospital.

    • USPSTF, US Preventive Services Task Force.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 30 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 30, Issue 2
March-April 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnosing Hypertension in Primary Care Clinics According to Current Guidelines
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Diagnosing Hypertension in Primary Care Clinics According to Current Guidelines
Sarah Woolsey, Brittany Brown, Brenda Ralls, Michael Friedrichs, Barry Stults
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2017, 30 (2) 170-177; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160111

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Diagnosing Hypertension in Primary Care Clinics According to Current Guidelines
Sarah Woolsey, Brittany Brown, Brenda Ralls, Michael Friedrichs, Barry Stults
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2017, 30 (2) 170-177; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160111
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Heterogeneity of the Effect of Telemedicine Hypertension Management Approach on Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of US-based Clinical Trials
  • Blood Pressure Checks for Diagnosing Hypertension: Health Professionals' Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices
  • Content Usage and the Most Frequently Read Articles of 2017
  • Measuring and Managing Blood Pressure in a Primary Care Setting: A Pragmatic Implementation Study
  • Improving Family Medicine with Thoughtful Research
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
  • Blood Pressure
  • Hypertension
  • Primary Health Care
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Utah

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire