Impact of One Versus Two Content-Specific Modules on American Board of Family Medicine Certification Examination Scores

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Norris TE,
   2. Rovinelli RJ,
   3. Puffer JC,
   4. Rinaldo J,
   5. Price DW

   . From specialty-based to practice-based: a new blueprint for the American Board of Family Medicine cognitive examination. J Am Board Fam Med 2005;18:546–54.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   ABFM certification/recertification examination content. Lexington, KY: American Board of Family Medicine; 2010.
3. 3.↵
   1. O'Neill TR,
   2. Shirley K

   . Psychometric department report to the ABFM Board of Directors. Lexington, KY: American Board of Family Medicine; 2009.
4. 4.↵
   1. O'Neill TR,
   2. Peabody MR

   . Memo on the effect of modules on MC-FP examination results. Lexington, KY: American Board of Family Medicine; 2013.
5. 5.↵
   1. O'Neill TR

   . Psychometrics Department Update. Presentation to the ABFM examination committee at the October board of directors' meeting. October 5, 2015. Lexington, KY: American Board of Family Medicine.
6. 6.↵
   1. O'Neill TR,
   2. Li Z,
   3. Peabody MR,
   4. Lybarger M,
   5. Royal KD,
   6. Puffer JC

   . The predictive validity of ABFM's in-training examination. Fam Med 2015;47:340–56.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Rasch G

   . Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research; 1960.
8. 8.↵
   1. Davis DA,
   2. Mazmanian PE,
   3. Fordis M,
   4. Van Harrison R,
   5. Thorpe KE,
   6. Perrier L

   . Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 2006;296:1094–102.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science