Article Figures & Data
Tables
- Table 1.
Visit and Physician Characteristics and Low-Value Test Ordering During Unannounced Standardized Patient Visits
Visit and Physician Characteristics Total Low-Value Test Ordered P Value No Yes N 155 114 41 Counseling behaviors Normalization 10 (6.5) 7 (6.2) 3 (7.3) .80 Risks outweigh benefits 88 (57.1) 73 (64.6) 15 (36.6) .002 Reassurance 147 (95.5) 110 (97.3) 37 (90.2) .06 Watchful waiting 104 (67.5) 99 (87.6) 5 (12.2) <.001 Evidence-based strategies 150 (97.4) 111 (98.2) 39 (95.1) .28 Patient-centeredness (MPCC), mean (SD) Component 1 40.7 (7.8) 40.8 (8.0) 40.5 (7.4) .82 Component 2 47.5 (16.7) 47.4 (17.6) 47.9 (14.0) .86 Component 3 43.1 (13.4) 42.7 (13.6) 44.3 (12.8) .52 Total 43.8 (8.2) 43.6 (8.5) 44.2 (7.4) .69 Study case Back pain 55 (35.5) 40 (35.1) 15 (36.6) <.001 DXA 47 (30.3) 26 (22.8) 21 (51.2) Headache 53 (34.2) 48 (42.1) 5 (12.2) Intervention Arm Intervention 78 (50.3) 58 (50.9) 20 (48.8) .82 Control 77 (49.7) 56 (49.1) 21 (51.2) Physician characteristics Postgraduate year 2 85 (54.8) 60 (52.6) 25 (61.0) .62 3 55 (35.5) 41 (36.0) 14 (34.1) 4 9 (5.8) 8 (7.0) 1 (2.4) 5 6 (3.9) 5 (4.4) 1 (2.4) Stress from uncertainty, mean (SD) 50.4 (10.8) 50.2 (10.5) 50.8 (11.8) .76 Reluctance to disclose uncertainty, mean (SD) 25.6 (4.7) 25.6 (4.7) 25.8 (4.3) .79 Data are n (%) unless otherwise indicated.
DXA, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; MPCC, Measure of Patient-Centered Communication; N, number of encounters (or visits); SD, standard deviation.
- Table 2.
Incremental Variance in Low-Value Test Ordering Explained by Specific Physician Communication Behaviors
Variables, by Model Adjusted Probability of Test Ordering* (95% CI) P Value Pseudo-R2 Base model† — — 9.3% Series 1‡ Normalization 4.7% (−23.6 to 32.9%) .75 9.3% Risks outweigh benefits −22.6% (−33.1 to 12.0) <.001 15.8% Reassurance −19.2% (−37.7 to −0.8) .04 20.3% Watchful waiting −38.6% (−43.6 to −33.6) <.001 53.1% Evidence-based recommendations −15.7% (−40.3 to 8.9) .21 9.6% Series 2§ 16.5% Normalization 6.4% (−23.4 to 36.2%) .67 Risks outweigh benefits −21.9% (−32.5 to −11.2%) <.001 Reassurance −14.7% (−31.9 to 2.6%) .10 Evidence-based recommendations 1.8% (−19.9% to 23.5%) .87 Series 3‖ 55.7% Normalization 9.8% (−11.1 to 30.6%) .67 Risks outweigh benefits −6.7% (−15.2 to 1.7%) .12 Reassurance 5.4 (−12.9 to 23.6) .57 Watchful waiting −38.0% (−44.3 to −31.7%) <.001 Evidence-based recommendations 10.3% (−2.2 to 22.7%) 0.11 ↵* Adjusted for the randomized controlled trial intervention.
↵† The base model included study arm and standardized patient (patient with back pain requesting magnetic resonance imaging, woman requesting dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, patient with headache requesting magnetic resonance imaging). Headache was associated with significantly less test ordering than back pain.
↵‡ In series 1, each communication behavior was included individually in separate models with base model variables.
↵§ In series 2, all communication behaviors, except watchful waiting, were included simultaneously together with base model variables.
↵‖ In series 3, all communication behaviors were included simultaneously together with the base model.
CI, confidence interval.
- Table 3.
Incremental Variance in Low-Value Test Ordering Explained by Patient Centered Communication
Variables, by Model Adjusted Effect on the Probability of Test Ordering* (95% CI) P Value Pseudo-R2 Base model† — — 9.3% Series 4‡ Component 1: patients' experience of illness 0.1% (−1.0%, 0.8%) .84 9.3% Component 2: psychosocial context 0.1% (−0.3%, 0.4%) .71 9.3% Component 3: attempt to find common ground 0.0% (−0.5%, 0.4%) .86 9.3% Series 5§ Total MPCC 0.0% (−0.8%, 0.8%) .94 9.3% ↵* Adjusted for the randomized controlled trial intervention.
↵† The base model included study arm and standardized patient (patient with back pain requesting magnetic resonance imaging, woman requesting dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, patient with headache requesting magnetic resonance imaging). Headache was associated with significantly less test ordering than back pain.
↵‡ In series 4, each Measure of Patient-Centered Communication (MPCC) component was included individually in separate models with base model variables.
↵§ Series 5 included the total MPCC together with base model variables.
CI, confidence interval.