Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Multicomponent Program to Reduce Functional Decline in Frail Elderly People: A Cluster Controlled Trial

Franca G.H. Ruikes, Sytse U. Zuidema, Reinier P. Akkermans, Willem J.J. Assendelft, Henk J. Schers and Raymond T.C.M. Koopmans
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2016, 29 (2) 209-217; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150214
Franca G.H. Ruikes
From the Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen (FGHR, RPA, WJJA, HJS, RTCMK); the Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen (SUZ); and the Joachim and Anna Centre for Specialized Geriatric Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (RTCMK).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sytse U. Zuidema
From the Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen (FGHR, RPA, WJJA, HJS, RTCMK); the Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen (SUZ); and the Joachim and Anna Centre for Specialized Geriatric Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (RTCMK).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reinier P. Akkermans
From the Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen (FGHR, RPA, WJJA, HJS, RTCMK); the Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen (SUZ); and the Joachim and Anna Centre for Specialized Geriatric Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (RTCMK).
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Willem J.J. Assendelft
From the Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen (FGHR, RPA, WJJA, HJS, RTCMK); the Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen (SUZ); and the Joachim and Anna Centre for Specialized Geriatric Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (RTCMK).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henk J. Schers
From the Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen (FGHR, RPA, WJJA, HJS, RTCMK); the Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen (SUZ); and the Joachim and Anna Centre for Specialized Geriatric Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (RTCMK).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond T.C.M. Koopmans
From the Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen (FGHR, RPA, WJJA, HJS, RTCMK); the Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen (SUZ); and the Joachim and Anna Centre for Specialized Geriatric Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (RTCMK).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Flow diagram of practices and participants. GP, general practitioner.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Participants in the Intervention Group and Control Group
    CharacteristicsCareWell Primary Care (n = 287)Usual Care (n = 249)P Value for Difference
    Age (years), mean (SD)83.1 (5.6)80.5 (6.0).42
    Female sex192 (66.9)160 (64.3).52
    Living alone182 (63.4)136 (54.6).039
    Socioeconomic status score,* mean (SD)0.5 (1.1)0.2 (0.5)<.001
    Low level of education69 (24.1)100 (41.0)<.001
    Cognition score,† mean (SD)7.5 (7.0)5.3 (4.8)<.001
    Katz-15 index,‡ mean (SD)5.4 (2.9)4.6 (2.7).33
    EQ-5D+C,§ mean (SD)0.6 (0.3)0.6 (0.3).08
    RAND-36 mental health¶61.1 (13.1)62.4 (13.7).38
    Presence of health-related limitations in social functioning‖178 (64.3)88 (37.1)<.001
    Frailty index,** mean (SD)0.4 (0.2)0.4 (0.2).90
    Presence of care complexity60 (21.1)75 (30.1).017
    • Data are expressed as numbers (percentage) unless otherwise indicated.

    • ↵* Socioeconomic status score was based on postal code areas (income, employment, and education); a higher score indicates more social disadvantage.

    • ↵† Based on a modified Mini-Mental State Examination (range, 0–28); a higher score indicates more cognitive problems.

    • ↵‡ Katz-15 scores range from 0 to 15; a higher score indicates more dependence in (instrumental) activities of daily living.

    • ↵§ EQ-5D+C scores range from −0.33 to 1.00; a higher score indicates a higher health-related quality of life.

    • ↵¶ The 36-item RAND Mental Health questionnaire (RAND-36) scores range from 0 to 100; a higher score indicates better mental health.

    • ↵‖ Based on the social functioning subscale of the RAND-36. Answers were dichotomized as the “absence of limitations” vs. the other categories indicating the “presence of limitations.”

    • ↵** The frailty index measures accumulated deficits (scale 0 to 1); a higher index suggests a more frail status.

    • EQ-5+C, EuroQuol instrument; SD, standard deviation.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Effects of the CareWell Primary Care Program on Primary and Secondary Outcomes
    OutcomeCareWell Primary Care* (n = 204)Usual Care* (n = 165)Estimated Intervention Effect* (95% CI)P Value
    BaselineChange at Follow-upBaselineChange at Follow-up
    Katz-15 index†5.4 (2.9)0.8 (1.9)4.6 (2.7)0.5 (2.1)0.37 (−0.1 to 0.8).10
    EQ-5D+C‡0.6 (0.3)0.0 (0.3)0.6 (0.3)0.0 (0.3)−0.031 (−0.1 to 0.0).37
    RAND-36 mental health§61.1 (13.1)−0.28 (13.6)62.4 (13.7)−0.8 (13.7)0.86 (−2.3 to 4.0).56
    Health-related limitations in social functioning¶1.5 (1.4)−0.1 (1.6)0.9 (1.3)0.3 (1.7)0.037 (0.2–0.2).76
    • Data are mean (standard deviation) unless otherwise indicated.

    • ↵* Adjusted for clustering; baseline values of relevant covariates (living situation, health-related limitations in social functioning, cognition score, socioeconomic status score, and care complexity); baseline value of the Katz-15 index; and, in the case of secondary outcomes, baseline value of the outcome parameter.

    • ↵† Katz-15 scores range from 0 to 15; a higher score indicates more dependence in (instrumental) activities of daily living.

    • ↵‡ EQ-5D+C scores range from −0.33 to 1.00; a higher score indicates a higher health-related quality of life.

    • ↵§ The 36-item RAND Mental Health questionnaire (RAND-36) mental health scores range from 0 to 100; a higher score indicates better mental health.

    • ↵¶ Based on the social functioning subscale of the RAND-36. Answers are dichotomized as the “absence of limitations” vs. the other categories indicating the “presence of limitations.”

    • CI, confidence interval; EQ-5D+C, EuroQol instrument.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Admissions and Mortality During Follow-up
    OutcomeCareWell Primary Care (n = 204)Usual Care (n = 165)Odds Ratio (95% CI)P Value
    Residential and nursing home admissions24 (8.3)13 (5.2)1.32 (0.64–2.71).46
    Hospital admissions52 (18.1)57 (22.9)0.74 (0.48–1.14).17
    Mortality31 (10.8)21 (8.4)1.13 (0.61–2.08).70
    • Data are n (%) unless otherwise indicated. CI, confidence interval.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 29 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 29, Issue 2
March-April 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Multicomponent Program to Reduce Functional Decline in Frail Elderly People: A Cluster Controlled Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 17 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Multicomponent Program to Reduce Functional Decline in Frail Elderly People: A Cluster Controlled Trial
Franca G.H. Ruikes, Sytse U. Zuidema, Reinier P. Akkermans, Willem J.J. Assendelft, Henk J. Schers, Raymond T.C.M. Koopmans
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2016, 29 (2) 209-217; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150214

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Multicomponent Program to Reduce Functional Decline in Frail Elderly People: A Cluster Controlled Trial
Franca G.H. Ruikes, Sytse U. Zuidema, Reinier P. Akkermans, Willem J.J. Assendelft, Henk J. Schers, Raymond T.C.M. Koopmans
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2016, 29 (2) 209-217; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150214
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Personalised care planning for older people with frailty: a review of factors influencing implementation
  • Understanding the implementation of interventions to improve the management of frailty in primary care: a rapid realist review
  • What long-term care interventions have been published between 2010 and 2020? Results of a WHO scoping review identifying long-term care interventions for older people around the world
  • Use of standardized brief geriatric evaluation compared with routine care in general practice for preventing functional decline: a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial
  • Cross-sectional study evaluating the association between integrated care and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in Dutch primary care
  • Frailty assessment in primary health care and its association with unplanned secondary care use: a rapid review
  • Outcomes of Health System Structures, Highly Pertinent Clinical Information, Idea Stimulators, Clinical Reviews, and Prediction Tools: JABFM Exemplified
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Frail Elderly
  • Geriatrics
  • Geriatric Assessment
  • Interdisciplinary Health Team
  • Primary Health Care

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire