Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleAbout Practice-Based Research Networks

Lessons Learned from Developing a Patient Engagement Panel: An OCHIN Report

Jill Arkind, Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman, Nate Warren, Kay Dickerson, Lynn Robbins, Kathy Norman and Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2015, 28 (5) 632-638; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150009
Jill Arkind
From OCHIN, Portland, OR (JA, NW, JED); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (SL-A, JED); and the OCHIN Patient Engagement Panel (KD, Portland, Oregon; LR, Eureka, California; KN, Enterprise, Oregon).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman
From OCHIN, Portland, OR (JA, NW, JED); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (SL-A, JED); and the OCHIN Patient Engagement Panel (KD, Portland, Oregon; LR, Eureka, California; KN, Enterprise, Oregon).
MID, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nate Warren
From OCHIN, Portland, OR (JA, NW, JED); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (SL-A, JED); and the OCHIN Patient Engagement Panel (KD, Portland, Oregon; LR, Eureka, California; KN, Enterprise, Oregon).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kay Dickerson
From OCHIN, Portland, OR (JA, NW, JED); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (SL-A, JED); and the OCHIN Patient Engagement Panel (KD, Portland, Oregon; LR, Eureka, California; KN, Enterprise, Oregon).
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynn Robbins
From OCHIN, Portland, OR (JA, NW, JED); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (SL-A, JED); and the OCHIN Patient Engagement Panel (KD, Portland, Oregon; LR, Eureka, California; KN, Enterprise, Oregon).
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathy Norman
From OCHIN, Portland, OR (JA, NW, JED); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (SL-A, JED); and the OCHIN Patient Engagement Panel (KD, Portland, Oregon; LR, Eureka, California; KN, Enterprise, Oregon).
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer E. DeVoe
From OCHIN, Portland, OR (JA, NW, JED); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (SL-A, JED); and the OCHIN Patient Engagement Panel (KD, Portland, Oregon; LR, Eureka, California; KN, Enterprise, Oregon).
MD, DPhil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Wright B
    . Do patients have a voice? The social stratification of health center governing boards. Health Expect 2013;18:430–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Boote J,
    2. Baird W,
    3. Beecroft C
    . Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy 2010;95:10–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    PCORnet. Patient-powered research networks. Available from: http://www.pcornet.org/patient-powered-research-networks/. Accessed July 21, 2015.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wright D,
    2. Corner J,
    3. Hopkinson J,
    4. Foster C
    . Listening to the views of people affected by cancer about cancer research: an example of participatory research in setting the cancer research agenda. Health Expect 2006;9:3–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wells K,
    2. Jones L
    . Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research. JAMA 2007;297:407–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Fagnan LJ,
    3. Handley M,
    4. et al
    . Practice-based research is community engagement. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:423–7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ahmed SM,
    2. Palmero A-GS
    . Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. Am J Public Health 2010;100:1380–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Wallerstein N,
    2. Duran B
    . Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health 2010;100(Suppl 1):S40–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. VanVorst RF,
    3. Main DS,
    4. Herbert C
    . Community-based participatory research in practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2006;4(1):8–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Tapp H,
    2. Dulin M
    . The science of primary health-care improvement: potential and use of community-based participatory research by practice-based research networks for translation of research into practice. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2010;235:290–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Pace WD,
    2. Fagnan LJ,
    3. West DR
    . The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) relationship: delivering on an opportunity, challenges, and future directions. J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:489–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Mold JW,
    2. Peterson KA
    . Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med 2005;3(Suppl 1):S12–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Boote JD,
    2. Twiddy M,
    3. Baird W,
    4. Birks Y,
    5. Clarke C,
    6. Beever D
    . Supporting public involvement in research design and grant development: a case study of a public involvement award scheme managed by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Design Service (RDS). Health Expect 2013 Oct 1 [Epub ahead of print].
  14. 14.↵
    1. Williams R,
    2. Shelley B,
    3. Sussman A
    . The marriage of community-based participatory research and practice-based research networks: Can it work? - A Research Involving Outpatient Settings Network (RIOS Net) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:428–35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Domecq JP,
    2. Prutsky G,
    3. Elraiyah T,
    4. et al
    . Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Deverka PA,
    2. Lavallee DC,
    3. Desai PJ,
    4. al E
    . Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. J Comp Eff Res 2012;1:181–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lavallee DC,
    2. Williams CJ,
    3. Tambor ES,
    4. Deverka PA
    . Stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: how will we measure success? J Comp Eff Res 2012;1:397–407.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Concannon TW,
    2. Meissner P,
    3. Grunbaum JA
    . A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 2012:27:985–91.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Frank L,
    2. Basch E,
    3. Selby JV
    . The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA 2014;312:1513–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Devoe JE,
    2. Sears A
    . The OCHIN community information network: bringing together community health centers, information technology, and data to support a patient-centered medical village. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26:271–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Devoe JE,
    2. Gold R,
    3. Spofford M,
    4. et al
    . Developing a network of community health centers with a common electronic health record: description of the Safety Net West Practice-based Research Network (SNW-PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:597–604.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. DeVoe JE,
    2. Likumahuwa S,
    3. Eiff MP,
    4. et al
    . Lessons learned and challenges ahead: report from the OCHIN Safety Net West practice-based research network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:560–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Wright B,
    2. Martin GP
    . Mission, margin, and the role of consumer governance in decision-making at community health centers. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2014;25:930–47.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Angier H,
    2. Wiggins N,
    3. Gregg J,
    4. DeVoe J
    . Increasing the relevance of research to underserved communities: lessons learned from a retreat to engage community health workers with researchers. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2013;24:840–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Thomson R,
    2. Murtagh M,
    3. Khaw FM
    . Tensions in public health policy: patient engagement, evidence-based public health and health inequalities. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:398–400.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. DeVoe JE,
    2. Gold R,
    3. Cottrell E,
    4. et al
    . The ADVANCE network: accelerating data value across a national community health center network. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21:591–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. DeVoe J,
    2. Angier H,
    3. Likumahuwa S,
    4. et al
    . Use of qualitative methods and user-centered design to develop customized health information technology tools within federally qualified health centers to keep children insured. J Ambul Care Manage 2014;37:148–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 28 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 28, Issue 5
September-October 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lessons Learned from Developing a Patient Engagement Panel: An OCHIN Report
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Lessons Learned from Developing a Patient Engagement Panel: An OCHIN Report
Jill Arkind, Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman, Nate Warren, Kay Dickerson, Lynn Robbins, Kathy Norman, Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2015, 28 (5) 632-638; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150009

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Lessons Learned from Developing a Patient Engagement Panel: An OCHIN Report
Jill Arkind, Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman, Nate Warren, Kay Dickerson, Lynn Robbins, Kathy Norman, Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2015, 28 (5) 632-638; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150009
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Brief Background Regarding OCHIN and the PEP
    • Challenges and Lessons Learned
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix1
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Recruitment of patients, carers and members of the public to advisory boards, groups and panels in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review
  • A Review of 50 Years of International Literature on the External Environment of Building Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs)
  • A Review of 50-Years of International Literature on the Internal Environment of Building Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs)
  • The top research questions asked by people with lived depression experience in Alberta: a survey
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs) Bridging the Gaps between Communities, Funders, and Policymakers
  • Lessons from Initiating the First Veterans Health Administration (VA) Women's Health Practice-based Research Network (WH-PBRN) Study
  • Clinician and Staff Perspectives on Participating in Practice-based Research (PBR): A Report from the Wisconsin Research and Education Network (WREN)
Show more About Practice-Based Research Networks

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Patient-centered Outcomes Research
  • Patient Engagement
  • Populations
  • Underserved
  • Primary Health Care

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire