Accelerated Adoption of Advanced Health Information Technology in Beacon Community Health Centers

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Walker J,
   2. McKethan A

   . Achieving accountable care–“It's not about the bike.” N Engl J Med 2012;366:e4.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Buntin MB,
   2. Jain SH,
   3. Blumenthal D

   . Health information technology: laying the infrastructure for national health reform. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:1214–9.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Fineberg H

   . A successful and sustainable health system–how to get there from here. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1020–7.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. PL 111–5, 123 Stat 226, 42 USC. February 7, 2009.
5. 5.↵
   1. Blumenthal D

   . Launching HITECH. New Eng J Med 2010;362:382–5.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Marcotte L,
   2. Seidman J,
   3. Trudel K,
   4. et al

   . Achieving meaningful use of health information technology. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:731–6.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Blumenthal D

   . Wiring the health system–origins and provisions of a new federal program. N Engl J Med 2011;365:2323–9.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Blumenthal D

   . Implementation of the federal health information technology initiative. N Engl J Med 2011;265:2426–31.

   OpenUrl
9. 9.↵
   Supporting health information technology adoption in federally qualified health centers. Washington, DC: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2013.
10. 10.↵
    1. Lynch K,
    2. Kendall M,
    3. Shanks K,
    4. et al

    . The Health IT Regional Extension Center Program: evolution and lessons for health care transformation. Health Serv Res 2014;49(1 Pt 2):421–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Gold M,
    2. McLaughlin C,
    3. Devers K,
    4. Berenson R,
    5. Bovjberg R

    . Obtaining providers' ‘buy-in’ and establishing effective means of information exchange will be critical to HITECH's success. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31:514–26.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Hsiao CJ,
    2. Jha AK,
    3. King J,
    4. Patel V,
    5. Furukawa MF,
    6. Mostashari F

    . Office-based physicians are responding to incentives and assistance by adopting and using electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:1470–7.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. DesRoches CM,
    2. Charles D,
    3. Furukawa MF,
    4. et al

    . Adoption of electronic health records grows rapidly, but fewer than half of US hospitals had at least a basic system in 2012. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:1478–85.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Maxson ER,
    2. Jain SH,
    3. McKethan AN,
    4. et al

    . Beacon communities aim to use health information technology to transform the delivery of care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:1671–7.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Fairbrother G,
    2. Trudnak T,
    3. Christopher R,
    4. Mansour M,
    5. Mandel K

    . Cincinnati beacon community program highlights challenges and opportunities on the path to care transformation. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33:871–7.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. McKethan A,
    2. Brammer C,
    3. Fatemi P,
    4. et al

    . An early status report on the Beacon Communities' plans for transformation via health information technology. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30:782–8.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Miller RH,
    2. D'Amato K,
    3. Oliva N,
    4. West CE,
    5. Adelson JW

    . California's digital divide: clinical information systems for the haves and have-nots. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:505–16.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Bahensky JA,
    2. Jaana M,
    3. Ward MM

    . Health care information technology in rural america: electronic medical record adoption status in meeting the national agenda. J Rural Health 2008;24:101–5.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Hawkins D,
    2. Groves D

    . The future role of community health centers in a changing health care landscape. J Ambul Care Manage 2011;34:90–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Shin P,
    2. Jones E,
    3. Jacobs F,
    4. Tuckson R

    . Building a national data repository to measure and improve health center quality. J Ambul Care Manage 2010;33:307–13.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Chin M,
    2. Kirchoff A,
    3. Schlotthauer A,
    4. et al

    . Sustaining quality improvement in community health centers: perceptions of leaders and staff. J Ambul Care Manage 2008;31:319–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Braun B.,
    2. Owens L,
    3. Bartman B,
    4. Berkeley L,
    5. Wineman N,
    6. Daly C

    . Quality-related activities in federally supported health centers: do they differ by organizational characteristics? J Ambul Care Manage 2008;31:303–18.

    OpenUrlPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Cebul RD,
    2. Love TE,
    3. Jain AK,
    4. Hebert CJ

    . Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care. N Engl J Med 2011;365:825–33.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Fiscella K,
    2. Geiger HJ

    . Health information technology and quality improvement for community health centers. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:405–12.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Frimpong JA,
    2. Jackson BE,
    3. Stewart LM,
    4. Singh KP,
    5. Rivers PA,
    6. Bae S

    . Health information technology capacity at federally qualified health centers: a mechanism for improving quality of care. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13:35.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. DeVoe J,
    2. Gold R,
    3. Cottrell E,
    4. et al

    . The ADVANCE network: accelerating data value across a national community health center network. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21:591–5.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Jones E,
    2. Furukawa M

    . Adoption and use of electronic health records among federally qualified health centers grew substantially during 2010–2. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33:1254–61.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Wittie M,
    2. Ngo-Metzger Q,
    3. Lebrun-Harris L,
    4. Shi L,
    5. Nair S

    . Enabling quality: electronic health record adoption and meaningful use readiness in federally funded health centers. J Healthc Qual 2015 Apr 22 [Epub ahead of print].
29. 29.↵
    1. DesRoches CM,
    2. Campbell EG,
    3. Rao SR,
    4. et al

    . Electronic health records in ambulatory care–a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med 2008;359:50–60.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Hing E,
    2. Hsiao CJ

    . Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Rep 2010;(23):1–11.
31. 31.↵
    1. Shields AE,
    2. Shin P,
    3. Leu MG,
    4. et al

    . Adoption of health information technology in community health centers: results of a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:1373–83.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Jones E,
    2. Swain M,
    3. Patel V,
    4. Furukawa M

    . Supporting HITECH implementation and assessing lessons for the future: the role of program evaluation. Healthc (Amst) 2014;2:4–8.

    OpenUrlPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. DeVoe J,
    2. Gold R,
    3. Spofford M,
    4. et al

    . Developing a network of community health centers with a common electronic health record: description of the Safety Net West Practice-Based Research Network (SNW-PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:597–604.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    1. Petersen K,
    2. Fontaine P,
    3. Speedie S

    . The electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePCRN): a new era in practice-based research. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:93–7.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Nagykaldi Z,
    2. Mold J

    . The role of health information technology in the translation of research into practice: an Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20:188–95.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Fontaine P,
    2. Ross S,
    3. Zink T,
    4. Schilling L

    . Systematic review of health information exchange in primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23:655–70.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Orzano J,
    2. Strickland P,
    3. Tallia A,
    4. et al

    . Improving diabetes outcomes for high-risk diabetics using information systems. J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20:245–51.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Crosson J,
    2. Schueth A,
    3. Isaacson N,
    4. Bell D

    . Early adopters of electronic prescribing struggle to make meaningful use of formulary checks and medication history documentation. J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:24–32.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Irani J,
    2. Middleton J,
    3. Marfatia R,
    4. Omana E,
    5. D'Amico F

    . The use of electronic health records in the exam room and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:553–62.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. O'Malley A

    . Tapping the unmet potential of health information technology. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1090–1.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    1. Stille C,
    2. Primack W

    . Interspecialty communication: old problem, new hope? Arch Intern Med 2011;171:1300.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed