Health Information Technology Needs Help from Primary Care Researchers

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Schoen C,
   2. Osborn R,
   3. Squires D,
   4. et al

   . A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31:2805–16.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   US Department of Health & Human Services. Doctors and hospitals' use of health IT more than doubles since 2012. August 5, 2013. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2013pres/05/20130522a.html. Accessed March 6, 2015.
3. 3.↵
   1. Hsiao CJ,
   2. Jha AK,
   3. King J,
   4. Patel V,
   5. Furukawa MF,
   6. Mostashari F

   . Office-based physicians are responding to incentives and assistance by adopting and using electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:1470–7.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Xierali IM,
   2. Hsiao CJ,
   3. Puffer JC,
   4. et al

   . The rise of electronic health record adoption among family physicians. Ann Fam Med 2013;11:14–9.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Blumenthal D,
   2. Tavenner M

   . The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):501–4.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. CMS Medicare and Medicaid EHR incentive programs: milestone timeline. Available from: http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/EHRIncentProgtimeline508V1.pdf. Accessed March 6, 2015.
7. 7.↵
   HealthIT.gov. Consolidated CDA overview. Available from: http://www.healthit.gov/policy-researchers-implementers/consolidated-cda-overview. Accessed March 6, 2015.
8. 8.↵
   Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) Department of Health and Human Services. 2014 Edition Electronic Health Record certification criteria: revision to the definition of “common meaningful use (MU) data set” Fed Regist 2013;45:65,884–7.

   OpenUrl
9. 9.↵
   1. Nguyen L,
   2. Bellucci E,
   3. Nguyen LT

   . Electronic health records implementation: An evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors. Int J Med Inform 2014;83:779–96.

   OpenUrlPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Lammers EJ,
    2. Adler-Milstein J,
    3. Kocher KE

    . Does health information exchange reduce redundant imaging? Evidence from emergency departments. Med Care 2014;52:227–34.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Nuckols TK,
    2. Smith-Spangler C,
    3. Morton SC,
    4. et al

    . The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2014;3:56.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Bishop TF,
    2. Press MJ,
    3. Mendelsohn JL,
    4. Casalino LP

    . Electronic communication improves access, but barriers to its widespread adoption remain. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:1361–7.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Krist AH,
    2. Woolf SH,
    3. Rothemich SF,
    4. et al

    . Interactive preventive health record to enhance delivery of recommended care: a randomized trial. Ann Fam Med 2012;10:312–9.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Krist AH,
    2. Woolf SH,
    3. Rothemich SF,
    4. et al

    . An interactive preventive health record to enhance delivery of recommended care: a randomized trial. Supplemental appendix. Ann Fam Med 2012;10:312–9. Available from: http://www.annfammed.org/content/10/4/312/suppl/DC1. Accessed March 6, 2015.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Krist AH,
    2. Woolf SH

    . A vision for patient-centered health information systems. JAMA 2011;305:300–1.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Goldzweig CL,
    2. Orshansky G,
    3. Paige NM,
    4. et al

    . Electronic patient portals: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:677–87.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Fanning J,
    2. Mullen SP,
    3. McAuley E

    . Increasing physical activity with mobile devices: a meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2012;14:e161.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Free C,
    2. Phillips G,
    3. Watson L,
    4. et al

    . The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2013;10:e1001363.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Edsall RL,
    2. Adler KG

    . User satisfaction with EHRs: report of a survey of 422 family physicians. Fam Pract Manag 2008;15:25–32.

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Beasley JW,
    2. Wetterneck TB,
    3. Temte J,
    4. et al

    . Information chaos in primary care: implications for physician performance and patient safety. J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:745–51.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Fiegel C

    . Stage 2 meaningful use rules sharply criticized by physicians. American Medical News, May 14, 2012. Available from: http://www.amednews.com/article/20120514/government/305149959/1/. Accessed March 6, 2015.
22. 22.↵
    1. Lewis Dolan P

    . Doctor's love-hate relationship with EHRs. American Medical News. May 7, 2012. Available from: http://www.amednews.com/article/20120507/business/305079968/4/. Accessed March 6, 2015.
23. 23.↵
    1. McDonald CJ,
    2. Callaghan FM,
    3. Weissman A,
    4. Goodwin RM,
    5. Mundkur M,
    6. Kuhn T

    . Use of internist's free time by ambulatory care electronic medical record systems. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:1860–3.

    OpenUrlPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Lewis Dolan P

    . Patients worried about medical records going digital. American Medical News, August 20, 2012. Available from: http://www.amednews.com/article/20120820/business/308209965/6/#relatedcontenthed/. Accessed March 6, 2015.
25. 25.↵
    1. Vodicka E,
    2. Mejilla R,
    3. Leveille SG,
    4. et al

    . Online access to doctors' notes: patient concerns about privacy. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e208.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Street RL Jr.,
    2. Liu L,
    3. Farber NJ,
    4. et al

    . Provider interaction with the electronic health record: the effects on patient-centered communication in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2014;96:315–9.

    OpenUrlPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Hirschtick RE

    . A piece of my mind. Copy-and-paste. JAMA 2006;295:2335–6.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Krist AH,
    2. Beasley JW,
    3. Crosson JC,
    4. et al

    . Electronic health record functionality needed to better support primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014.
29. 29.↵
    Health IT research priorities to support the health care delivery system of the future. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2014;21:764–71.

    OpenUrl
30. 30.↵
    JASON, The MITRE Corporation. A robust health data infrastructure. AHRQ publication no. 14-0041-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.
31. 31.↵
    1. Woolf SH,
    2. Krist AH

    . What the research community can learn from patient and stakeholder engagement. October 1, 2014. Available from: http://www.pcori.org/blog/what-research-community-can-learn-patient-and-stakeholder-engagement. Accessed March 6, 2015.
32. 32.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Mold J,
    3. Fagnan L

    . Practice-based research–“Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007;297:403–6.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Reid PP,
    2. Compton WD,
    3. Grossman JH,
    4. Fanjiang G

    . Building a better delivery system: a new engineering/health care partnership. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.
34. 34.↵
    1. Crandall B,
    2. Klein GA,
    3. Hoffman RR

    . Working minds: a practitioner's guide to cognitive task analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006.
35. 35.↵
    1. Potworowski G,
    2. Green LA

    . Cognitive task analysis: methods to improve patient-centered medical homes by understanding and leveraging its knowledge work. AHRQ publication no. 13-0023-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013.
36. 36.↵
    1. Greenhalgh T

    . Role of routines in collaborative work in healthcare organisations. BMJ 2008;337:a2448.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Becker MC

    . Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Indust Corporate Change 2004;13:643–77.

    OpenUrlAbstract
38. 38.↵
    1. Beasley JW,
    2. Carayon P,
    3. Smith MA

    , eds. Improving quality and efficiency of primary care through industrial and systems engineering–a white paper. 2013. Available from: http://www.fammed.wisc.edu/sites/default/files/webfm-uploads/documents/research/i-practise/i-practise-white-paper.pdf/. Accessed March 6, 2015.
39. 39.↵
    1. Heintzman J,
    2. Gold R,
    3. Krist A,
    4. Crosson J,
    5. Likumahuwa S,
    6. DeVoe JE

    . Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are promising laboratories for conducting dissemination and implementation research. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:759–62.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. Hsiao CJ,
    2. Cherry DK,
    3. Beatty PC,
    4. Rechtsteiner EA

    . National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 summary. Natl Health Stat Rep 2010;(27):1–32.
41. 41.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Kessler RS,
    3. Ory MG,
    4. Roby D,
    5. Gorin SS,
    6. Krist A

    . Conducting rapid, relevant research: lessons learned from the My Own Health Report project. Am J Prev Med 2014;47:212–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Graham-Jones P,
    2. Jain SH,
    3. Friedman CP,
    4. Marcotte L,
    5. Blumenthal D

    . The need to incorporate health information technology into physicians' education and professional development. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31:481–7.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    1. Phillips RL Jr.,
    2. Kaufman A,
    3. Mold JW,
    4. et al

    . The primary care extension program: a catalyst for change. Ann Fam Med 2013;11:173–8.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text