Promotion of Family-Centered Birth With Gentle Cesarean Delivery

References

1. 1.↵
   1. McClellan MS,
   2. Cabianca WA

   . Effects of early mother-infant contact following cesarean birth. Obstet Gynecol 1980;56:52–5.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. DiMatteo MR,
   2. Morton SC,
   3. Lepper HS,
   4. et al

   . Cesarean childbirth and psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 1996;15:303–14.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Smith J,
   2. Plaat F,
   3. Fisk NM

   . The natural caesarean: a woman-centred technique. BJOG 2008;115:1037–42, discussion 1042.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Bystova K,
   2. Widström A,
   3. Matthiesen AS,
   4. et al

   . Skin-to-skin contact may reduce negative consequences of “the stress of being born”: a study on temperature in newborn infants, subjected to different ward routines in St. Petersburg. Acta Paediatr 2003;92:320–6.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Nolan A,
   2. Lawrence C

   . A pilot study of a nursing intervention protocol to minimize maternal-infant separation after cesarean birth. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2009;38:430–42.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Gouchon S,
   2. Gregori D,
   3. Picotto A,
   4. Patrucco G,
   5. Nangeroni M,
   6. Di Giulio P

   . Skin-to-skin contact after cesarean delivery: an experimental study. Nurs Res 2010;59:78–84.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Moore ER,
   2. Anderson GC,
   3. Bergman N

   . Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;18:CD003519.

   OpenUrl
8. 8.↵
   1. Bramson L,
   2. Lee JW,
   3. Moore E,
   4. et al

   . Effect of early skin-to-skin mother-infant contact during the first 3 hours following birth on exclusive breastfeeding during the maternity hospital stay. J Hum Lact 2010;26:130–7.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Chalmers B,
   2. Kaczorowski J,
   3. Darling E,
   4. et al

   . Cesarean and vaginal birth in Canadian women: a comparison of experiences. Birth 2010;37:44–9.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    American Academy of Pediatrics, American Heart Association. Neonatal resuscitation textbook, 6th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2010.
11. 11.↵
    1. Graham EM,
    2. Petersen SM,
    3. Christo DK,
    4. Fox HE

    . Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108(3 Pt 1):656–66.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Macones GA,
    2. Hankins GD,
    3. Spong CY,
    4. Hauth J,
    5. Moore T

    . The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:661–6.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Makoha FW,
    2. Felimban HM,
    3. Fathuddien MA,
    4. Roomi F,
    5. Ghabra T

    . Multiple cesarean section morbidity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004;87:227–32.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Rowe-Murray HJ,
    2. Fisher JRW

    . Baby friendly hospital practices: cesarean section is a persistent barrier to early initiation of breast-feeding. Birth 2002;29:124–31.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    Section on Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 2012;129:e827–841.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    Protecting, promoting, and supporting breastfeeding: the special role of maternity services. A joint WHO/UNICEF statement. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1990;31(Suppl 1):171–83.

    OpenUrlPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Baby-Friendly USA

    . The guidelines & evaluation criteria. Sandwich, MA: Baby-Friendly USA; 2010. Available from: http://www.babyfriendlyusa.org/get-started/the-guidelines-evaluation-criteria. Accessed April 12, 2013.