Research ArticleOriginal Research

The Association of Type and Number of Chronic Diseases with Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening

Betty Y. Liu, Jean O'Malley, Motomi Mori, Lyle J. Fagnan, David Lieberman, Cynthia D. Morris, David I. Buckley, John D. Heintzman and Patricia A. Carney
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2014, 27 (5) 669-681; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2014.05.140005

References

  1. 1.↵
    Screening for cervical cancer. Summary of recommendations and evidence. Rockville, MD: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; 2012. Available from: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf11/cervcancer/cervcancerrs.htm#summary. Accessed July 17, 2014.
  2. 2.↵
    Screening for breast cancer. Rockville, MD: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; 2009. Available from: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsbrca.htm. Accessed July 17, 2014.
  3. 3.↵
    Screening for colorectal cancer. Rockville, MD: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; 2008. Available from: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspscolo.htm. Accessed July 17, 2014.
  4. 4.↵
    US Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States cancer statistics: 1999–2010 incidence and mortality web-based report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2013. Available from: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/uscs/toptencancers.aspx. Accessed July 17, 2014.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sasieni P,
    2. Castanon A,
    3. Cuzick J
    . Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: population based case-control study of prospectively recorded data. BMJ 2009;339:b2968.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Cancer trends progress report–2011/2012 update. Breast cancer screening. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health; 2010. Available from: http://progressreport.cancer.gov/doc_detail.asp?pid=1&did=2007&chid=72&coid=716&mid=#benefits. Accessed July 17, 2014.
  7. 7.↵
    Cancer trends progress report—2011/2012 update. Cervical cancer screening. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health; 2010. Available from: http://progressreport.cancer.gov/doc_detail.asp?pid=1&did=2009&chid=92&coid=917&mid=. Accessed July 17, 2014.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Jones RM,
    2. Devers KJ,
    3. Kuzel AJ,
    4. Woolf SH
    . Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis. Am J Prev Med 2010;38:508–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Smith RA,
    2. Cokkinides V,
    3. Brooks D,
    4. Saslow D,
    5. Shah M,
    6. Brawley OW
    . Cancer screening in the United States, 2011: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:8–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Cancer screening–United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012;61:41–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    South Carolina Rural Health Research Center. Rural residents lag in preventive services use; lag increases with service complexity. Policy brief no. 1. Columbia: South Carolina Rural Health Research Center; 2009.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Doescher MP,
    2. Jackson JE
    . Trends in cervical and breast cancer screening practices among women in rural and urban areas of the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract 2009;15:200–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Coughlin SS,
    2. Thompson TD,
    3. Hall HI,
    4. Logan P,
    5. Uhler RJ
    . Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998–1999. Cancer 2002;94:2801–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Coughlin SS,
    2. Thompson TD
    . Colorectal cancer screening practices among men and women in rural and non-rural areas of the United States, 1999. J Rural Health 2004;20:118–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Carney PA,
    2. O'Malley J,
    3. Buckley DI,
    4. et al
    . Influence of health insurance coverage on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care settings. Cancer 2012;118:6217–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Finney Rutten LJ,
    2. Nelson DE,
    3. Meissner HI
    . Examination of population-wide trends in barriers to cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective. Prev Med 2004;38:258–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Swan J,
    2. Breen N,
    3. Coates RJ,
    4. Rimer BK,
    5. Lee NC
    . Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer 2003;97:1528–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ruffin MT,
    2. Gorenflo DW,
    3. Woodman B
    . Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Pract 2000;13:1–10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Michels KB,
    2. Solomon CG,
    3. Hu FB,
    4. et al
    . Type 2 diabetes and subsequent incidence of breast cancer in the nurses' health study. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1752–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Yuhara H,
    2. Steinmaus C,
    3. Cohen SE,
    4. Corley DA,
    5. Tei Y,
    6. Buffler PA
    . Is diabetes mellitus an independent risk factor for colon cancer and rectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:1911–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Larsson SC,
    2. Mantzoros CS,
    3. Wolk A
    . Diabetes mellitus and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2007;121:856–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Coughlin SS,
    2. Calle EE,
    3. Teras LR,
    4. Petrelli J,
    5. Thun MJ
    . Diabetes mellitus as a predictor of cancer mortality in a large cohort of US adults. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:1160–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Karathanasi I,
    2. Kamposioras K,
    3. Cortinovis I,
    4. et al
    . Moving ahead in diabetics' cancer screening; food for thought from the hellenic experience. Eur J Cancer Care 2009;18:255–63.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Lipscombe LL,
    2. Hux JE,
    3. Booth GL
    . Reduced screening mammography among women with diabetes. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2090–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kiefe CI,
    2. Funkhouser E,
    3. Fouad MN,
    4. May DS
    . Chronic disease as a barrier to breast and cervical cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:357–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ludman EJ,
    2. Ichikawa LE,
    3. Simon GE,
    4. et al
    . Breast and cervical cancer screening: specific effects of depression and obesity. Am J Prev Med 2010;38:303–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Yasmeen S,
    2. Xing G,
    3. Morris C,
    4. Chlebowski RT,
    5. Romano PS
    . Comorbidities and mammography use interact to explain racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Cancer 2011;117:3252–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Heflin MT,
    2. Oddone EZ,
    3. Pieper CF,
    4. Burchett BM,
    5. Cohen HJ
    . The effect of comorbid illness on receipt of cancer screening by older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:1651–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Zhao G,
    2. Ford ES,
    3. Ahluwalia IB,
    4. Li C,
    5. Mokdad AH
    . Prevalence and trends of receipt of cancer screenings among US women with diagnosed diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 2008;24:270–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Nutting PA,
    2. Baier M,
    3. Werner JJ,
    4. Cutter G,
    5. Conry C,
    6. Stewart L
    . Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations? J Am Board Fam Pract 2001;14:352–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  31. 31.↵
    1. Fontana S,
    2. Baumann LC,
    3. Helberg C,
    4. Love RR
    . The delivery of preventive services in primary care practices according to chronic disease status. Am J Public Health 1997;87:1190–6.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Healthy People 2020. Topics and objectives. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2012. Available from: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicId=5. Accessed July 17, 2014.
  33. 33.↵
    1. Charlson ME,
    2. Pompei P,
    3. Ales KL,
    4. MacKenzie CR
    . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    Screening for breast cancer (2002). Rockville, MD: US Preventive Services Task Force; 2010. Available from: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsbrca2002.htm. Accessed July 17, 2014.
  35. 35.↵
    Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003.
  36. 36.↵
    US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:129–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG
    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Sim J,
    2. Wright CC
    . The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005;85:257–68.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Schoen RE,
    2. Marcus M,
    3. Braham RL
    . Factors associated with the use of screening mammography in a primary care setting. J Community Health 1994;19:239–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Larsson SC,
    2. Orsini N,
    3. Wolk A
    . Diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1679–87.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Podsakoff PM,
    2. MacKenzie SB,
    3. Lee JY,
    4. Podsakoff NP
    . Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 2003;88:879–903.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Keywords